List Mgmt. List planning 2015 and onwards

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Malibu#27

Premium Platinum
Joined
Feb 25, 2002
Posts
13,565
Likes
7,943
Location
Barossa Valley
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Port Magpies, Redbacks
http://m.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-p...nd-brisbane-busy/story-e6frf3e3-1227538944136
HAMISH Hartlett is expected to commit his long-term future to Port Adelaide despite keen interest from rival clubs.
With the Power managing a tight salary cap, there was suggestions the club was vulnerable to losing Hartlett as it looks to accommodate Gold Coast forward Charlie Dixon.
However, Fox Footy understands the 25-year-old is weighing up a new deal that would effectively make him a one-club player.
The lucrative offer is likely to be back ended to help Port Adelaide through its cap squeeze.
Hartlett’s current two-year contract does not expire until 2016, coinciding with his restricted free agency eligibility.
Cross-town rivals Adelaide, in addition to Victorian clubs Melbourne, North Melbourne and Richmond, have been linked to Hartlett. However, the Demons are not considered a likely destination.
 

Malibu#27

Premium Platinum
Joined
Feb 25, 2002
Posts
13,565
Likes
7,943
Location
Barossa Valley
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Port Magpies, Redbacks
However, the Demons are not considered a likely destination. :D

#destinationclubnot
However, the Demons are not considered a _______________________
a) Likely destination
b) Possible destination
c) Serious football club
d) Football club
e) All of the above
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Posts
1,081
Likes
1,921
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Liverpool, Portsmouth
david king basically backed up what all of us have been saying here.

he says
-he has spoken to people at port, who found the reports quite bizarre
-hamish close and very keen to recommitting to the club
-no salary cap squeeze (why resign schulz to lose hartlett?)
-hamish hartlett is not a player you let go.

i believe him because i believe the club has its friends in the media who they will give inside info to because they have no agenda (king, Afl 360) or are football people who dont try to big note themselves by spreading rumours like barrett or scoops.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2015
Posts
76
Likes
50
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
david king basically backed up what all of us have been saying here.

he says
-he has spoken to people at port, who found the reports quite bizarre
-hamish close and very keen to recommitting to the club
-no salary cap squeeze (why resign schulz to lose hartlett?)
-hamish hartlett is not a player you let go.

i believe him because i believe the club has its friends in the media who they will give inside info to because they have no agenda (king, Afl 360) or are football people who dont try to big note themselves by spreading rumours like barrett or scoops.
We're did you here that ??
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Posts
1,081
Likes
1,921
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Liverpool, Portsmouth
We're did you here that ??
he was on On The Couch after the all australian awards.

healy was pushing his mate from 3aw scoop' agenda. david king shut him down pretty strongly. Brown and Dunstall both doubted it as well.
 

raman

Premium Platinum
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Posts
22,065
Likes
62,234
Location
Enemy terriroty
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
david king basically backed up what all of us have been saying here.

he says
-he has spoken to people at port, who found the reports quite bizarre
-hamish close and very keen to recommitting to the club
-no salary cap squeeze (why resign schulz to lose hartlett?)
-hamish hartlett is not a player you let go.
All good and positive points, but I still can't get past the fact that David King is a complete twat whose eyes are too close together.
 

Hong-Kong Phooey

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Posts
6,876
Likes
6,597
Location
i have no idea
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Man United
Lets say Rooch is right for once :drunk: who are the 5 trade table players?

Young, Moore, O'Shea, Butcher (stay calm), The Carhoon ?

*Mitchell, I doubt would garner any interest
I think all the players not delisted have some sort of value, even Mitchell which is why he wasn't delisted
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2002
Posts
55,231
Likes
87,657
Location
Port Adelaide 5015
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Port Adelaide Magpies
Moderator #5,175
Lets say Rooch is right for once :drunk: who are the 5 trade table players?

Young, Moore, O'Shea, Butcher (stay calm), The Carhoon ?

*Mitchell, I doubt would garner any interest
Big assumption about Rooch. Check out any of his long range trade forecasts. He's pissing in the wind and hoping it's blowing at his back. Doesn't help that he's spinning round in circles. ;)

Players get belted enough during trade week without starting our own unfounded witch hunt.
 
Top Bottom