Watched them both, and they are both amazing, but here is the thing. Both played on teams that were on the opposite sides of the ladder.
Lloyd beats Fev in stats BUT Fev with the team he was on and still dominated backmen in his prime of his career is something we need to notice.
Fevola is a forward who can do anything from anywhere. He was as good a kick from outside 50m than anyone and his also as good as any small forward when pressured, something Lloyd didnt have as locked down as well.
Lloyd is a tradional great forward, with his marking, leads and set shots, Fevola was a forward that not only excelled the tradional forward traits, but he will kick a goal on his back and impossible angles.
For me, my vote goes to Fevola because he was capable of more things on the field and did it all on a lesser side. Swap the two forwards around and i cant see Lloyd being as good playing for Carlton but i see Fevola being heaps better playing for Essendon at those times.
I never saw Fevola take a speccie.
I never saw Fevola take over a final by scruff of it's neck like Lloyd (and Hird) did on occasions.
You also say Fevola could do anything and from anywhere, Lloyd did the mercurial more than you seem to remember. He had it all.
The only knock on Lloyd's career is how it all ended.
Some say it was Knight's fault but to kick 930 goals from only 270 games, it says it all really.