Lord of the rings

Remove this Banner Ad

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Chris_1493

Debutant
Apr 29, 2014
125
123
SA
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Liverpool
The first one, like most first in a series things, is for a large part there to set up the story. To be honest I preferred the other two more, but overall it is worth watching. Just make sure you have plenty of time spare to watch them.
 

darcytiger

Club Legend
Apr 11, 2007
2,854
3,068
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
I liked them both but I sort of grew up with the Harry Potter films coming out at the right age bracket per film. If I were to see the first couple now as an adult I wouldn't like them because they are aimed at children. They get darker and more adult as the series progresses.

Harry Potter is a good franchise, LOTR is a masterpiece.
 

Legendairy

All Australian
Aug 25, 2013
775
322
Victoria
AFL Club
West Coast
I liked them both but I sort of grew up with the Harry Potter films coming out at the right age bracket per film. If I were to see the first couple now as an adult I wouldn't like them because they are aimed at children. They get darker and more adult as the series progresses.

Harry Potter is a good franchise, LOTR is a masterpiece.
But why does the 1st one go for almost 4 hours?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Dont be a lemon

Brownlow Medallist
Suspended
Jun 2, 2006
17,806
3,517
Party time all the time
AFL Club
Essendon
I watched them as they came out as a teen. I found them a little annoying probably because I was on Team Potter and everyone wanked about this instead. But I suppose I liked them enough to keep going. I was a dull teenager though.

Watched the extended versions completely baked as a responsible adult over three nights a couple years ago. They were better than I remembered. Being high made the 726 minutes feel like 2000 minutes.

They're very good blockbuster films but wanting to not scare off the children dollars limits the story. Could do with more proper violence and sex. The monarchist overtones were a kind of dumb and the side story of that old guy who was basically a king but officially wasn't but his family had been ruling the city for centuries waiting for the royal family to rock back up was pretty stupid.

The third film winning Best Picture at the Oscars is absurd.

They're worth watching yes.
 

Sterge

Moderator
Jun 3, 2009
38,738
64,002
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Avs/Pats/Chelsea
I watched them as they came out as a teen. I found them a little annoying probably because I was on Team Potter and everyone wanked about this instead. But I suppose I liked them enough to keep going. I was a dull teenager though.

Watched the extended versions completely baked as a responsible adult over three nights a couple years ago. They were better than I remembered. Being high made the 726 minutes feel like 2000 minutes.

They're very good blockbuster films but wanting to not scare off the children dollars limits the story. Could do with more proper violence and sex. The monarchist overtones were a kind of dumb and the side story of that old guy who was basically a king but officially wasn't but his family had been ruling the city for centuries waiting for the royal family to rock back up was pretty stupid.

The third film winning Best Picture at the Oscars is absurd.

They're worth watching yes.
 

juss

Brownlow Medallist
Feb 23, 2009
21,222
26,932
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
New York Jets
First one was out in 2000 and you still haven't watched it after 14 years? The trilogy is the best ever, these movies are the greatest IMO.

Do yourself a favour and watch them.

Get on the hobbits as well, another masterpiece by Peter Jackson.

LOTR > HP
Please dont ever mention the Hobbit and LOTR in the same status. They dont hold a candle to LOTR and are so so dissapointing compared to his first trilogy.

Im a huge LOTR fan, but the Hobbit is average at best. The second one was slightly better though.
 

SuperCats9

Norm Smith Medallist
Apr 16, 2012
6,461
2,337
Melbourne
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
Manchester United
They're half as good as the LOTR films but still very good movies, I thought the first hobbit was good, and the second went up a few gears.

Hoping the third one does the same.
 

Top Bottom