willoblue
Club Legend
the differences between the 2 extend beyond the depth of their kicking.My turn - is this post sarcasm?
IMO the only comparison is that they are both slow. Clancee offers way more "metres" per possession than Lower due to his kicking ability. That is the overall problem with Lower at the top level - he just doesn't have enough damage factor.
yes, Pearce has it over Lower for depth of kick.
They both have good ball winning skills, but where Lower has it all over Pearce is his general football ability that is difficult to describe. His decision making is that much quicker, with Clancee's slow "football mind" causing him to get the pill, but then to be that split second slow to release or to miss the quick option. Lower has fast hands & a quick "football mind" with his best work occurring on the inside.
The loss of Lower is going to come back & bite us on the bum I reckon.









