Remove this Banner Ad

Luke Parker vs Ollie Wines

Who would you take for their career?

  • Luke Parker

  • Ollie Wines


Results are only viewable after voting.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

At the same age within their careers:
http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...1=3801&tid2=17&pid2=3485&type=A&fid1=O&fid2=O

Based on that, I'd pick Ollie Wines in a heartbeat.

However, Luke Parker did have a better season in 2014, but also had 30 games on Ollie.
http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...1=3801&tid2=17&pid2=3485&type=A&fid1=S&fid2=S

In terms of overall career, this to me suggests that Ollie is slightly better than Parker currently.
http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...1=3801&tid2=17&pid2=3485&type=A&fid1=C&fid2=C

So yeah, I'd choose Ollie.
 
Parker is one of the best midfielders in the competition at 22.

Wines is a player that they are trying to bring up to that level.

Surely you'd take the one that is already there with youth also on his side, there is always the small chance that Wines will stagnate.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I'd probably take Wines as I feel he's more of a gamechanger

Parker is a gun still though
 
Both big time players, you'd really be happy with either.

I'd probably go Luke Parker just for his marking up forward. Very similar to Bartel in that regard,superb overhead.
 
Tough choice and you really can't go wrong with either but I would take wines, even though parker is a slightly more established player at this point in time.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I'm happy where Wines is at, the semi against Freo did it for me where Fyfe was having a good game and Wines went on him at half time and cleaned him up (numerous contested possesions and 3 goals in that half). As Parker is 2 years older also adds to my argument and I'm not saying I wouldn't have Parker in a heartbeat either.
 
So these threads are just straight up trolling, right?

Generational players in Wingard and Wines v Luke Breust and Parker. Let me think for a sec...
You are joking right? Parker has produced more than Wines and is also young so it's definitely a valid argument. I'd have Parker as I think he has more weapons than Wines. For the record, Ablett and Buddy are generational players, Wines and Wingard are both very good youngsters both who are not yet elite and they have 1 AA and 1 B&F between them. For what it's worth, this current PA team currently have zero 'once in a generation' type players on their team.
 
Both big time players, you'd really be happy with either.

I'd probably go Luke Parker just for his marking up forward. Very similar to Bartel in that regard,superb overhead.

Wines has shown he is very capable up forward as well though.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Luke Parker vs Ollie Wines

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top