Scandal Luke Slayers

[Blightys Barrel]

So if she didn’t post the picture then really all that’s left is that he did it himself by mistake which remains as hilarious as it was at the very start of this

She was on the other side of Italy from where he was, so I think her alibi is fine. My guess is that Sayers is old school and not too great on simple tech tools.

I have said to many a friend that the phone manufacturers (Android and iPhone) they need to have an AI filter detection function anytime a Dick Pic selfie is taken and they access the “Send” function with a pop up.

“You really want to send this and risk your career and reputation?” Warning 1

“Hey numb nuts. This is your last chance for me to beat some common sense into you” Warning 2 and finally

“You call that a penis. I thought it was thumb that had seen better days. Go pleasure yourself and switch off the phone” Final warning

 

[Bunk Moreland]

So Luke’s response to the investigation was to sign a statutory declaration to the effect:

- My wife did it

- She suffers from significant mental disorders and often refuses to take prescribed medication

- You can’t interview her to get her response to this because she’s unstable and can’t be trusted

The AFL and Carlton took this on face value.

They've ****ed this up. If you're going to appoint yourself as an investigator then you have to do a proper job. You can't take a statement that says "She did it all, you can't ask her, she'll just lie" and that's it.

You have to make a reasonable effort to gather all the facts and that includes giving the accused a chance to give their side of things. Of course it's sensitive if there's mental health issues - so you make sure she's interviewed in an appropriate way with her own legal and personal support people present.

 

[The Blue Max]

View attachment 2543399

So Luke’s response to the investigation was to sign a statutory declaration to the effect:

- My wife did it

- She suffers from significant mental disorders and often refuses to take prescribed medication

- You can’t interview her to get her response to this because she’s unstable and can’t be trusted

The AFL and Carlton took this on face value.

They've ****ed this up. If you're going to appoint yourself as an investigator then you have to do a proper job. You can't take a statement that says "She did it all, you can't ask her, she'll just lie" and that's it.

You have to make a reasonable effort to gather all the facts and that includes giving the accused a chance to give their side of things. Of course it's sensitive if there's mental health issues - so you make sure she's interviewed in an appropriate way with her own legal and personal support people present.

This is a potentially HUGE problem for the AFL.

I’m doubt it could be brought up as a criminal charge of perjury against the CFC or AFL, but if Cate wins (and I’m betting she will - there’ll be no out of court settlement in this one) - the Media will have a field day and heads will roll, most likely Dillon’s, Gleeson’s and the Chief Investigator.

This kind of corruption, where the AFL is seen to have a hand in facilitating a perjury should be a warning shot to the new Chief Commissioner of the AFL - you are not above the law.

 

[dmc333]

he doesn't come off looking good in this at all.

https://archive.ph/MN46C

The AFL comes off looking even worse.

****ing campaigners.