Scandal Luke Slayers

[gambinotosserflog]

If he's smart he throws a junior staff member of his company under the bus with the "social media coordinator" title and just throws money at them to shut up.

how does that happen if its his private phone

 

[DamoESP]

Absolute joke that nothing else has come out from this yet. It's clear as day for anyone that has the slightest understanding of technology that he wasn't "hacked".

The club need to be investigating this, and surely Sayers is gone before the end of the month.

 

[WillHayward]

So a hacker gets remote access to his X account and also happens to somehow have a picture of his dick as well?

Can someone explain how that would be even a remote possible scenario?

Id love to hear this

 

[brmi]

Luke Sayers has his liquor license

And he's very, very good at it

 

[Grave Danger]

Luke made his bed, now he has to lie about it.

 

[PiCkLeJuiCe]

So a hacker gets remote access to his X account and also happens to somehow have a picture of his dick as well?

Can someone explain how that would be even a remote possible scenario?

Id love to hear this

Is the photo him?

FWIW, I think it's bullshit. When someone hacks an account they change the password and then spam followers with bullshits ads and shit. I know a new people who have had accounts compromised and in every instance, the hacker used the followers for spam purposes. They don't send specific photos to specifically tagged individuals.

 

[ITCHY EYEBALLS]

Embarrasment, resign in shame.

 

[Devington]

Is the photo him?

FWIW, I think it's bullshit. When someone hacks an account they change the password and then spam followers with bullshits ads and shit. I know a new people who have had accounts compromised and in every instance, the hacker used the followers for spam purposes. They don't send specific photos to specifically tagged individuals.

The only scenario where he was 'hacked' is if it was unauthorised access by someone who was able to access his account. Such as his wife, after finding out she was being cheated on...

 

[WillHayward]

Is the photo him?

FWIW, I think it's bullshit. When someone hacks an account they change the password and then spam followers with bullshits ads and shit. I know a new people who have had accounts compromised and in every instance, the hacker used the followers for spam purposes. They don't send specific photos to specifically tagged individuals.

It's his dick.

That's the problem.

 

[Beerfish]

Not sure why people think he should get the boot. He's clearly exactly where he belongs.

 

[Corn Cobbers]

Not sure why people think he should get the boot. He's clearly exactly where he belongs.

Well there's all this [emoji38]

On SM-A225F using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[RonnieRaven]

Well there's all this [emoji38] View attachment 2202307

On SM-A225F using BigFooty.com mobile app

No Stone Unturned!!!

 

[Devington]

Well there's all this [emoji38] View attachment 2202307

On SM-A225F using BigFooty.com mobile app

When is the International Dick Pic Day?

 

[WillHayward]

When is the International Dick Pic Day?

He's a big fighter for the marginalised, the circumcised and the uncircumcised.
Diversity, equality and bravery to be on the foreskin of positive social change.

 

[WillHayward]

Speaks volumes for Australia's current culture that nobody went to gaol over the PWC tax scandal.

Sayers still gets government contracts, still gets government money directed to his wife's charity, still president of Carlton and still cultivates close associations with MPs of both brands (red and blue).

And no doubt Labor ministers, MPs and senior bureaucrats all lick his ass and can't wait to tuck their knees under his dinner table.

 

[gambinotosserflog]

So a hacker gets remote access to his X account and also happens to somehow have a picture of his dick as well?

Can someone explain how that would be even a remote possible scenario?

Id love to hear this

Well there's all this [emoji38] View attachment 2202307

On SM-A225F using BigFooty.com mobile app

Not sure how any of that is relevant (at present based on what we know). We actually don't know the circumstances. IF it was intentional (but meant to be via DM), then provided it's consensual, none of these apply. What you've posted just SOUNDS relevant, but it's not (yet). Consensual hanky panky (legally speaking) is still permissible. If it's unwanted, then that's a different story entirely.

 

[gambinotosserflog]

The only scenario where he was 'hacked' is if it was unauthorised access by someone who was able to access his account. Such as his wife, after finding out she was being cheated on...

This. Playing one hypothetical scenario out, wife finds out about affair, does this in a fit of pique. However, I'm wondering if doing so contravenes 'revenge pron' legislation?

 

[Pistol Night]

This. Playing one hypothetical scenario out, wife finds out about affair, does this in a fit of pique. However, I'm wondering if doing so contravenes 'revenge pron' legislation?

He sounds like the sort of bloke that has that many dick pics in his arsenal that he has one as a screensaver on his phone

 

[gambinotosserflog]

So a hacker gets remote access to his X account and also happens to somehow have a picture of his dick as well?

Can someone explain how that would be even a remote possible scenario?

Id love to hear this

One possible hypothetical scenario is some sort of (ill thought out) personal sabotage going on.

We are somewhat naive in Australia to this, but 'corporate espionage', power plays etc., do go on.

Overall however, I'm currently leaning towards 1. fumbly fingers/lack of tech savvy or 2. hell hath no fury

 

[gambinotosserflog]

He sounds like the sort of bloke that has that many dick pics in his arsenal that he has one as a screensaver on his phone

Sounds like the sort of bloke based on what? 1 week ago you would have nothing of the sort to base this on, so what has changed in a week?

 

[Bunk Moreland]

Following the Taryn Thomas episode, it really is pathetic of the AFL not to investigate this.

They may find there was no issues with it (ie the recipient of the message had no problem with it), in which case they can just say it’s been resolved as a private matter and they’re taking no action.

But what if it is unwelcome harassment of an unwilling person??

Just shows you how the AFL’s stance on these things is complete bullshit - it just depends who you are.

 

[Devington]

Following the Taryn Thomas episode, it really is pathetic of the AFL not to investigate this.

They may find there was no issues with it (ie the recipient of the message had no problem with it), in which case they can just say it’s been resolved as a private matter and they’re taking no action.

But what if it is unwelcome harassment of an unwilling person??

Just shows you how the AFL’s stance on these things is complete bullshit - it just depends who you are.

Well there would still be an issue, which is that a club president is having an affair with someone that works for a club sponsor. That's messy, and leads to other questions.

But thankfully they don't have to ask those questions if they don't investigate

 

[Pistol Night]

Sounds like the sort of bloke based on what? 1 week ago you would have nothing of the sort to base this on, so what has changed in a week?

His dick pic mainly

 

[bobs head soup]

Not sure why people think he should get the boot. He's clearly exactly where he belongs.

Yup, just classic Carlton President behaviour.

If the technology was available back in the day, guys like John Elliott, Ian Rice and George Harris would've been sending dick pics left, right and centre.

(Apologies to those who may be eating whilst entertaining that thought).

 

[Pistol Night]

Yup, just classic Carlton President behaviour.

If the technology was available back in the day, guys like John Elliott, Ian Rice and George Harris would've been sending dick pics left, right and centre.

Imagine the lucky lady receiving a black and white faxed dick pic from old “Pigs Arse”.