Remove this Banner Ad

Lyon on Cousins, finally a little credit from a Vic.

  • Thread starter Thread starter jod23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Joined
Apr 2, 2000
Posts
77,116
Reaction score
26,419
Location
Perth, Australia
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Liverpool, Chicago Bulls.
Cousins contrast to struggling team
By Garry Lyon

Tuesday, June 26, 2001

THERE haven't been too many opportunities this year to pass positive comment on the West Coast Eagles.

They are suffering like never before in their 14-year history, during which they have been, at times, the most powerful and imposing combination in the land.

But right now they are struggling to be competitive at all, on any front, a reminder of how fleeting success can be and how demoralising the bottom rungs of the AFL ladder can be to occupy.

But amid the doom and gloom of Friday night's 81-point drubbing emerged a performance that was striking, not only in its execution but also in its contrast to the sorry display put on by his team.

It came from the Eagles' 22-year-old co-captain, Ben Cousins, and was memorable because he is a young player who refused to compromise his extremely high standards, regardless of what can be a seductive mediocrity inherent in the Eagles at the moment.

I was taken with his desire to impose himself on almost every contest. I suspect that if I was actually at the game I would have appreciated his indefatigable work ethic even more. He has at times been accused of winning most of his possessions in the back half, where the smart onball player can accumulate large numbers with the luxury of little or no opposition. This wasn't the case on Friday night.

Cousins wasn't trying to save the game, nor ''beef'' up his possessions tally. In fact he was credited with winning only four of his 34 touches in his own defensive 50m. He was terrific in the centre square where his work, in tandem with Michael Gardiner, was instrumental in the Eagles' four-point quarter-time lead.

So often he would be involved in a passage of play, have the ball cleared toward the West Coast goal, only to see him bob up in the next contest. His punishing training regime is almost legendary in Western Australia, but to actually be able to take full advantage of your superior fitness in a game situation is another matter altogether.

One would only have to ask Andrew Dimattina, Tarkyn Lockyer, Carl Steinfort or Paul Licuria for confirmation this is exactly what Cousins can do. They all, at different stages and for varying lengths of time, had to run with Cousins and all had little success.

In fact it would be an interesting exercise to ask Dimattina to compare the style of game, and output, of Cousins and reigning Brownlow medallist Shane Woewodin. In Dimattina's last outing he eclipsed Woewodin, performing a similar close-checking assignment to that asked of him with Cousins, to the point where at the end of the game it almost appeared that Woewodin was tagging Dimattina.

Against the Eagles he was sitting on the bench before quarter-time with Cousins having already chalked up close to 10 touches. It might be a handy video of the game for Woey to get a hold of as well to have a look at, to remind himself of just how hard you have to work to shake a tag.

The fact that Cousins is able to consistently perform at or near his peak, while all around him are struggling, speaks volumes for the man's class and mental toughness.

He no longer has the luxury of sharing the considerable load with Glen Jakovich, Dean Kemp and Peter Matera. They have been where Cousins now sits, among football's elite, but they sit there no longer. Their battle is to maintain a physical and mental equilibrium that will allow them to play out their remaining days as valuable contributors to the team.

From someone who encountered them at their dominant and all-conquering best, it's sad to say that it's a battle, on both fronts, they all seem to be struggling with.

Cousins will enjoy an enormously successful football career. By the time this season finishes he will be 23, probably have his first best and fairest under his belt to add to his two All-Australian jumpers and his Norwich Rising Star Award.

The club captaincy will be his and his alone, a situation that could remain for another six or seven years.

Whether or not he walks away from the game with a couple of premierships -- as his mates Jako, Roo and Tommy Kemp will -- remains to be seen, and to be honest it seems a fair way off.

I get the feeling though, that when Cousins' time is up, he will have deserved one.
 
Just some stats on undoubtedly our best player, cuz:

(Year) (# of games) (Av. # of disposals) (Av. # of Marks) (Goals)
1998 23 21.26 2.74 20
1999 22 23.41 3.41 14
2000 17 25.35 3.94 9
2001 12 26.25 2.67 8

Now just out of interest, compare it to Daniel Kerr's:

(Year) (# of games) (Av. # of disposals) (Av. # of Marks) (Goals)
2001 12 16 2.25 3

So despite Daniel Kerr still being behind Cousins in his first year, it looks like Kerr is going to be our next Cousins. Remember Kerr is playing in a team that gets beaten frequently and Cousins in his first year was still in a good team. Kerr's performance therefore wouldn't be as good as Cuz's. Still promising signs though, one is 23 at the end of the season and one is 18.

Vis
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Interesting stats there Vis, looks like Kerr can and should be a gun in the next few years, not that i ever had any doubt.

What is your stance on Cuz though, does he deserve an AA spot?
I think no question! Buckley made it every year in a really bad side so why cant Cousins, and so far this year Cousins has played better footy than Bucks.
 
Originally posted by Visro
So despite Daniel Kerr still being behind Cousins in his first year, it looks like Kerr is going to be our next Cousins. Remember Kerr is playing in a team that gets beaten frequently and Cousins in his first year was still in a good team. Kerr's performance therefore wouldn't be as good as Cuz's. Still promising signs though, one is 23 at the end of the season and one is 18.

Vis

Did you make the comparison basing 1998 as cousins first season? Because from memory Cousins made his debut way back in 1996.

Otherwise, yeah, Kerr will probably be our next cousins.

And on current form if cousins doesn't make the AA team i'm gonna send a nasty surprise to the AA team selectors (i do yr12 chem and physics so i know a bit about making smelly or explosive items :D :p )
 
Just remember his apparent lack of interest in the International Series two years ago was the main reason he was't considered last year.

I don't agree with it, but that's the way it is. Thanks Derm and Gerard.

So yeah, I think he would probably deserve AA selection if his form and fitness (touch wood) consider, but wouldn't surprise if he missed out again.....
 
You cant not include him in the AA team just cos he doesnt want to go to Ireland. And is there some sort of contract or something that says if your chosen to be an AA you have to play in the international series....No!

Stupid selectors.
 
I think their gripe was that he wanted AA selection and to play in the Interational Series (over here that year?), but didn't come over early enough to train.

From memory his form wasn't great either, but that's irrelevant to AA selection....
 
Originally posted by jod23
You cant not include him in the AA team just cos he doesnt want to go to Ireland. And is there some sort of contract or something that says if your chosen to be an AA you have to play in the international series....No!

Stupid selectors.

The whole AA selection process is a crock of sh!t if you ask me. Every year they pick the Coleman Medallist as FF in the AA team, then they change it one year allegedly because Lloyd would be a better FF for the Irish series. Then Silvagni is ruled out of the Irish series through injury but thesy still make him AA fullback. Total sh!te
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom