Remove this Banner Ad

M Rucci this week

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Macca19 said:
Before I found out about Bigfooty I was a regular poster on newsgroups under the name Macca. Macca was already taken when i joined here so I added my age at the time.
And there was me thinking you were a big fan of Garry "Macca" McIntosh
 
Jars458 said:
If he works so hard why does he get basic facts wrong?

That's something that I've always noticed with Rucci. His articles always contain a ridiculous number of errors with regards to what should be the most basic facts.

Todays example, in the last line of his article he claimed that Wakelin was reported for "charging Adelaide key forward Scott Welsh".

It was Goodwin, not Welsh who was involved in that incident.

These sort of inaccuracies are far too common with Rucci.
 
**** said:
That's something that I've always noticed with Rucci. His articles always contain a ridiculous number of errors with regards to what should be the most basic facts.

Todays example, in the last line of his article he claimed that Wakelin was reported for "charging Adelaide key forward Scott Welsh".

It was Goodwin, not Welsh who was involved in that incident.

These sort of inaccuracies are far too common with Rucci.

And is why you can't take him seriously then again we know an ex-Adelaide captain that didn't check his facts. Must be the 5AA studios!!!
 
kirky said:
And is why you can't take him seriously then again we know an ex-Adelaide captain that didn't check his facts. Must be the 5AA studios!!!
That’s sort of right.
Why do you think KG has stayed around? He finds something to be controversial about and polarises his audience. He usually takes the high ground where as Bone usually takes the hard line and Rooch tries the intellectual/political approach.
But their motis operandi (sp) is much the same Split the audience and make them look for as much information as they can get.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

just maybe said:
You know what? P*ss off. I don't care how sorry you feel for Rucci. He is a journalist and should maintain a modicum of credibility. If he can't deal with it, then quit the job. He hasn't. So he deserves as much disdain, and more, that we give, because he is a pathetic excuse for a journalist.

He lies, he misrepresents, he stirs rubbish by attacking Crows players in the media. He deserves to be booed. He deserves everything he gets, because as a journalist he lives with the scum on a pub toilet floor. There's a difference between being 'edgy and controversial' and writing outright crap. If he had any credibility, he'd make an effort. He doesn't.

I hope you were drinking when you posted this, otherwise you are a solid gold pork chop.
 
A week after claiming "Adelaide can't handle the truth", Rucci is now claiming that Adelaide are "the most dangerous player in the race to the top 8".

He has no idea. :D
 
**** said:
A week after claiming "Adelaide can't handle the truth", Rucci is now claiming that Adelaide are "the most dangerous player in the race to the top 8".

He has no idea. :D
He was wrong then, and he's wrong now.

The Truth Is In Between. :p
 
**** said:
A week after claiming "Adelaide can't handle the truth", Rucci is now claiming that Adelaide are "the most dangerous player in the race to the top 8".

He has no idea. :D

So bloody typical.

If we get thrashed this week, what will he say then?
 
kirky said:
And is why you can't take him seriously then again we know an ex-Adelaide captain that didn't check his facts. Must be the 5AA studios!!!

This is why most Centrals supporters have been boycotting the station for years. Even Pilko, an alleged 'Centrals supporter' starts kicking into Centrals supporters at every opportunity. 5AA are absolute crap and its an absolute shame SEN has been a flop so far. Nothing on 5AA can be taken seriously.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

crazy_big_al said:
would u like some cheese with that wine :rolleyes:

Trust a Port supporter to stuff up even the simplest payout... :rolleyes:

I believe what you were looking for is:

'would u like some cheese with that whine'

But either way, yes I would like some cheese with my wine/whine. Thanks for asking, I'll expect it from you at your earliest convenience.
 
just maybe said:
Trust a Port supporter to stuff up even the simplest payout... :rolleyes:

I believe what you were looking for is:

'would u like some cheese with that whine'

But either way, yes I would like some cheese with my wine/whine. Thanks for asking, I'll expect it from you at your earliest convenience.


While big_al is clearly an idiot, it aint a spelling comp either, important to remember that ;)
 
Actually, you're both wrong. If you're making a payout where the point is the similarity in sound between 'wine' and 'whine', as that is the whole crux of the joke, then you are obliged to write it correctly otherwise the joke just flops utterly.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom