Remove this Banner Ad

Macrae & Stringer vs Martin & Anderson

Martin & Anderson or Macrae & Stringer

  • Martin & Anderson

    Votes: 36 26.9%
  • Macrae & Stringer

    Votes: 98 73.1%

  • Total voters
    134

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Stringer has the most potential. So strong and skilled at the same time. Most 18 year olds need years of bulking up to get that strength.
I disagree, Martin has the most potential.

Pace, aggression, height, amazing skills, endurance, will to tackle, hunger at the contest, x-factor and a brilliant contested mark.

All these qualities in spite of being a rake, similar to Fyfe in his first season. Not once has it hampered his performance against big bodied players either.

Give him a couple of seasons to settle in and build some strength and he will be an absolute force.
 
I disagree, Martin has the most potential.

Pace, aggression, height, amazing skills, endurance, will to tackle, hunger at the contest, x-factor and a brilliant contested mark.

All these qualities in spite of being a rake, similar to Fyfe in his first season. Not once has it hampered his performance against big bodied players either.

Give him a couple of seasons to settle in and build some strength and he will be an absolute force.

I have seen nothing but highlights of martin as he hasn't played an AFL game
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Hard to say, Martin is probably going to be the best of the lot but how much better? i reckon Stringer + Macrae will be better than Anderson..Very tough call for us i would go Stringer + Macrae. FWIW i think Stringer could be the best of his draft and Macrae is going to be a very good player.
 
Let me put it this way: Jaeger O'Meara is better than the three that have played AFL football. Martin is better than Jaeger.

lets not start jumping to conclusions, while he may be rated higher than O'Meara internally the kid weighs like 50kg dripping wet whos to say he will be able to cope with the big bodies in the AFL and make the transition? His father is also crazy, his aboriginal and sometimes they struggle more with moving across the other side of the country etc. Jbomb looks to be one of the best kids I've ever seen and seems very well grounded. Martin certainly looks like an amazing proposition at the moment though and im sure the GC are wrapt as are we with Stringer/Macrae. FWIW i think O'Meara will be better than all of Martin/Stringer/Macrae and Anderson and i would take him over all of them.
 
Well today -

Macrae - 43 possies and 2 goals
Stringer - 12 possies and 2 goals
Martin - 6 possies and 1 goal

Now i still wouldn't be surprised to see Stringer or Martin turn out to be the best of the 4, Like i said last year Martin will take a while to transition due to his size and Stringer is also going to take time but dam the doggies would be happy we keept pick #5 and #6.. Macrae however is looking better than anyone could have expected.
 
Well today -

Macrae - 43 possies and 2 goals
Stringer - 12 possies and 2 goals
Martin - 6 possies and 1 goal

Now i still wouldn't be surprised to see Stringer or Martin turn out to be the best of the 4, Like i said last year Martin will take a while to transition due to his size and Stringer is also going to take time but dam the doggies would be happy we keept pick #5 and #6.. Macrae however is looking better than anyone could have expected.

Is this a joke post? Seriously Martin not only is a year younger but he missed over half this season with a serious injury.
 
Now i still wouldn't be surprised to see Stringer or Martin turn out to be the best of the 4, Like i said last year Martin will take a while to transition due to his size

He used stats out of today's game then said he wouldn't be as good as the others. Anyone with half a clue knows Martin is behind in perpetration due to injury.

Lol what?
Can you read?
Guess you missed were i said I wouldn't be surprised to see Stringer or Martin the best out of the four at the end of their careers...
Fact is Macrae is currently leaps and bounds better than any of the four atm.
 
He used stats out of today's game then said he wouldn't be as good as the others.


So you are not only a poor troll, you also fail at comprehension. He said Martin would take a while to develop due to his size but he wouldn't be surprised if he turned out the best.

On the thread topic: all four look like quality players, definitely not a mistake by the Dogs to get their two players over one of the others.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

So you are not only a poor troll, you also fail at comprehension. He said Martin would take a while to develop due to his size but he wouldn't be surprised if he turned out the best.

On the thread topic: all four look like quality players, definitely not a mistake by the Dogs to get their two players over one of the others.

The point is he's rushed to this thread posting all threes stats to try and push his players. Really not hard to see his agenda.
 
Just stick to your Stanley v Jones thread.

You don't like us very much do you Adam. And that's fine, everyone has certain clubs that they dislike.

But you seem to have a really angry boner for the Doggies mate.
 
You don't like us very much do you Adam. And that's fine, everyone has certain clubs that they dislike.

But you seem to have a really angry boner for the Doggies mate.

I actually like the Dogs more than most. Thought Stanley or Kosi a couple of years ago would be good for you but copped a heap of abuse for it.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So you are not only a poor troll, you also fail at comprehension. He said Martin would take a while to develop due to his size but he wouldn't be surprised if he turned out the best.

On the thread topic: all four look like quality players, definitely not a mistake by the Dogs to get their two players over one of the others.

The Dogs didn't have a choice. They wanted the Martin+Anderson option and were trumped.
 
He used stats out of today's game then said he wouldn't be as good as the others. Anyone with half a clue knows Martin is behind in perpetration due to injury.
Um, no he didn't. He just showed that Martin hasn't been as good so far, but that he could still be the best.

It's pretty clear now though that Macrae+Stringer is better than Martin+Anderson. Never expected Macrae to get so good so fast and Stringer coming along very nicely recently. Not saying that Martin won't still be the best, but it will be hard for him to be as far ahead of those others as initially thought.
 
Last edited:
Um, no he didn't. He just showed that Martin hasn't been as good so far, but that he could still be the best.

It's pretty clear now though that Macrae+Stringer is better than Martin+Anderson. Never expected Macrae to get so good so fast and Stringer coming along very nicely recently.

Yeah considering Anderson and Martin have both missed with major injuries you'd hope so.
 
I voted Martin and Anderson mainly because I think Anderson is going to be an absolute freak.

If I had to choose 2 to join the Lions however I would think long and hard about choosing Macrae and Stringer. They will both be 200 game players for the Doggies. Macrae is an absolute jet and Stringer has that Stevie Johnson type of x-factor. Stringer just needs a couple more AFL pre seasons to get his fitness up to scratch and he will have regular 20 possession, 5 marks, 2 goal games.
 
Stringer doesn't look great.

Macrae and Martin could be equal but Jed Anderson once he actually plays a bit should overtake stirnger quite quickly.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Macrae & Stringer vs Martin & Anderson

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top