Unsolved Madeleine McCann - New Leads Being Reported

[owen87]

An experienced burglar would have opened the window for a couple of reasons, mostly for a quick exit if anybody came in through any of the doors, thereby avoiding a confrontation.

He didn't use the window.

The absence of finger prints is just open and shut evidence in all crimes.

Gloves don’t exist.

 

[Angry Red Bull]

The window was very small. Some observers say a man couldn't exit through the window. Many say a small thin man could IF he turned side on and squeezed through. All say a man couldn't carry a child through. Then there was a small drop to the ground outside making it worse. Being an experienced burglar he would have known all the idiosyncratic features of every unit. He would know that that window wasn't one that could be a safe exit in haste. If it came to the point he had to run it wasn't the escape route. It also was the bedroom for the kids. If what's been suggested is true( he knew the routine) then making his escape route in the same room that parents were returning to to check on kids......pretty dumb. He'd be halfway out having taken 15 or more seconds and the returning parent would grab him and start pounding his head having made himself vulnerable caught in that position unable to oppose

Could McCanns have left it open? Nah. They were the ones though who first reported to approx 8 people that it was jimmied and shattered by abductor to gain access. It wasn't of course. How could they get it soooo wrong? Kate's print was on the mechanism so at least she must have known how they operate and their functioning absent being 'shattered'. Yet she encouraged this mantra.

Pat Brown the criminal profiler has concluded that the unit was entirely locked that night. That's consistent with Gerry's first account to police when the window was suggested as access and exit point though Kate had indicated sliding doors were closed but unlocked. She was the one after all that had used the mechanism (finger print) and knew just how small the window opening was. Interesting that the two parents couldn't agree on how to enter despite regular visits to make sure the kids are safe. Gerry just couldn't remember he walked 50 metres less and came in the back way......and yet he stood at the street exit of that backway with Wilkins for several minutes.

 

[owen87]

The window was very small. Some observers say a man couldn't exit through the window. Many say a small thin man could IF he turned side on and squeezed through. All say a man couldn't carry a child through. Then there was a small drop to the ground outside making it worse. Being an experienced burglar he would have known all the idiosyncratic features of every unit. He would know that that window wasn't one that could be a safe exit in haste. If it came to the point he had to run it wasn't the escape route. It also was the bedroom for the kids. If what's been suggested is true( he knew the routine) then making his escape route in the same room that parents were returning to to check on kids......pretty dumb. He'd be halfway out having taken 15 or more seconds and the returning parent would grab him and start pounding his head having made himself vulnerable caught in that position unable to oppose

Could McCanns have left it open? Nah. They were the ones though who first reported to approx 8 people that it was jimmied and shattered by abductor to gain access. It wasn't of course. How could they get it soooo wrong? Kate's print was on the mechanism so at least she must have known how they operate and their functioning absent being 'shattered'. Yet she encouraged this mantra.

Pat Brown the criminal profiler has concluded that the unit was entirely locked that night. That's consistent with Gerry's first account to police when the window was suggested as access and exit point though Kate had indicated sliding doors were closed but unlocked. Interesting that the two parents couldn't agree on how to enter despite regular visits to make sure the kids are safe. Gerry just couldn't remember he walked 50 metres less and came in the back way......and yet he stood at the street exit of that backway with Wilkins for several minutes.

It's not a large window, but Bruckner doesn't appear to be a large man.

In a pinch I wouldn't think it's unrealised for someone who's not particularly tall nor overweight, and reasonably 'young' to think they could fit through that window to escape if they were caught partway through. If it's an escape plan they don't need to be able to take the child through the window as well.

Assuming perfect knowledge is a flawed position to take.