nobbyiscool
Cancelled
WWE Board
Goosed
Sweet F.A Sikh Volunteers Charity Match
Tasmanian Team
NFL Fantasy Comp Champion
Armchair Endzone Major Comp Champion
- Aug 11, 2006
- 21,110
- 23,512
The umpiring didn't (directly) impact the result today, but it was pretty weird. Collingwood got an armchair ride in the first half - there was absolutely no consistency in the holding the ball decisions between teams.
Then the umpires had a fair bit to do with the Eagles getting back in front in the 3rd quarter. We weren't getting them cos we had the momentum - we were getting them because, again, the umpiring was shockingly inconsistent.
I think Collingwood scored more goals as a direct result of the inconsistent umpiring, but we didn't deserve to win in any case. I was at the game, so haven't looked into stats or anything - but from the naked eye it was clear that Collingwood were smashing us in contested possessions, and were tackling animals today. It's such an indictment on the Eagles that a team playing for nothing was sooooooo much harder at the ball than a team that was (is?) allegedly fighting for a top 4 spot. It's not good enough that we can look so good on the counter attack when we're in "clear air", but can look so disinterested in fighting it out in the trenches.
I argued in the "Eagles for top 4?" thread that if we can beat at least 2 of GWS, Hawthorn and Adelaide, we'll have earned a top 4 spot. I was wrong. Performances like that already indicate that we don't deserve to finish top 4. We're just playing soft as butter footy at the moment
Then the umpires had a fair bit to do with the Eagles getting back in front in the 3rd quarter. We weren't getting them cos we had the momentum - we were getting them because, again, the umpiring was shockingly inconsistent.
I think Collingwood scored more goals as a direct result of the inconsistent umpiring, but we didn't deserve to win in any case. I was at the game, so haven't looked into stats or anything - but from the naked eye it was clear that Collingwood were smashing us in contested possessions, and were tackling animals today. It's such an indictment on the Eagles that a team playing for nothing was sooooooo much harder at the ball than a team that was (is?) allegedly fighting for a top 4 spot. It's not good enough that we can look so good on the counter attack when we're in "clear air", but can look so disinterested in fighting it out in the trenches.
I argued in the "Eagles for top 4?" thread that if we can beat at least 2 of GWS, Hawthorn and Adelaide, we'll have earned a top 4 spot. I was wrong. Performances like that already indicate that we don't deserve to finish top 4. We're just playing soft as butter footy at the moment