Solved Malcolm McCusker will bid to clear Sharon Masons sentenced murderer in Perth WA

[Beatnicked]

What new and fresh evidence?

Who had motive? A convicted pedophile would have motive. Yes I know he's apparently innocent of everything that's been thrown at him over the years and he's really an angel...

He is not a convicted pedophile. There are no convictions related to pedophile activity.

 

[Beatnicked]

So you keep saying but how can you possibly know? You don't.

Because we know their, that being the perpetrators', plan. Their time is nigh.

 

[Beatnicked]

What "compelling new and fresh evidence" was that?

A strict propensity somebody has used their entire life connected to dates. Who had motive?

And it is very very strange this same propensity is evident with the death dates of Sharon's mother and father Michael and Sharon's disappearance.

I am not in any way inferring Sharon's parents had involvement in her disappearance.

 

[sprockets]

We are we the people that know

Except you couldn't possibly know.

He is not a convicted pedophile. There are no convictions related to pedophile activity.

1969 conviction for indecent assault of his daughter ring a bell? Law got that wrong too I take it, just like some of his other serious crimes. The world's got it in for him.

 

[Beatnicked]

Except you couldn't possibly know.


1969 conviction for indecent assault of his daughter ring a bell? Law got that wrong too I take it, just like some of his other serious crimes. The world's got it in for him.

You need to do some checking what the UK charge involved. There is a propensity there.

Who had motive?

And yes we do know

 

[sprockets]

You need to do some checking what the UK charge involved. There is a propensity there.

Who had motive?

And yes we do know

It's not charges, it's a conviction.

 

[Beatnicked]

It's not charges, it's a conviction.

Strawpickin

Who had motive?

 

[Beatnicked]

Except you couldn't possibly know.


1969 conviction for indecent assault of his daughter ring a bell? Law got that wrong too I take it, just like some of his other serious crimes. The world's got it in for him.

You have a vital fact in incorrect. Daughter? Who is the father? When was her non bio father born? What is her birthdate? What is her mother's birthdate? What was the correct date of marriage in 1957? What was decree nisi grant date in 1978? Who filed for divorce? What date was that? Who lodged the UK offense? What happened 9 days later after decree nisi? Who was that person connected to? What date is that connected to?

What is the propensity?

There is definite proof the convicted man had no idea of the propensity! The propensity is used by others.

Who had motive?

 

[Beatnicked]

What date did a marriage occur in 1976? What is the connection to her birthdate? What is the propensity of the marriage date to the husbands birthdate? What occurred before the marriage date? What threat was made? Who signed the marriage authority? What was her birthday?What was the birthdate of the man that married the person who signed that authority? What date did something occur in the UK in 1969? What dates are the propensity? What date was her 2nd husbands birthday?

What date was her 1st child born? What is relevance of that birthdate to her birthdate and 1st marriage date? The answer is the most relevant date of all!

Who had motive?

 

[Beatnicked]

What is relevance of discovery date and her birthdate and her marriage date. Therein lies the propensity proof.

 

[Melsy]

Is there any artistic licence in this?

"Jane Reynolds said Ms Reynolds met Sharon in grade four at Mosman Park Primary School and said they were "joined at the hip"."

"The day Sharon went missing in February 1983, the pair had been on a brief shopping trip with another friend to the Fremantle markets and then bought hot chips before catching the bus together.

"Sharon had to be home by midday so we arrived at Mosman Park bus stop," she said.

"I turned and waved to her and I will never forget that last glimpse of her face, with a smile on her face, and she waves back.

"That's the last I saw of Sharon."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-01-18/woman-speaks-out-against-push-to-free-arthur-greer/9336452

 

[Beatnicked]

"Jane Reynolds said Ms Reynolds met Sharon in grade four at Mosman Park Primary School and said they were "joined at the hip"."

"The day Sharon went missing in February 1983, the pair had been on a brief shopping trip with another friend to the Fremantle markets and then bought hot chips before catching the bus together.

"Sharon had to be home by midday so we arrived at Mosman Park bus stop," she said.

"I turned and waved to her and I will never forget that last glimpse of her face, with a smile on her face, and she waves back.

"That's the last I saw of Sharon."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-01-18/woman-speaks-out-against-push-to-free-arthur-greer/9336452

What is your point? This has been posted a few times already.

Sharon never had to be home by midday and Jane never testified or stated this at any time previously. Interesting she has changed her story yet again!

Jane also gave incorrect testimony as to why Sharon got off the bus where she did. Again she changed her testimony about that between trials.

We also have a copy of Sharon's mother's unpublished book manuscript and she did not include any reference to a requirement that Sharon was to return home by a certain time.

 

[Melsy]

What is your point? This has been posted a few times already.

Sharon never had to be home by midday and Jane never testified or stated this at any time previously. Interesting she has changed her story yet again!

Jane also gave incorrect testimony as to why Sharon got off the bus where she did. Again she changed her testimony about that between trials.

We also have a copy of Sharon's mother's unpublished book manuscript and she did not include any reference to a requirement that Sharon was to return home by a certain time.

Why has Jane given incorrect testimony - to appease police?

What is the real story? Why has Jane changed her story? What is the truth and what is fiction? Is it all fiction? Even Fremantle Markets?

 

[Melsy]

Sharons father would have been able to reconcile some of Sharons movements. Certainly a return time, as he was working at a polling booth in Mosman Park. Unfortunately Sharons father committed suicide.

So can Sharons mother reconcile Sharons movements or anything that Jane said or did Sharons mother just go along with Janes story?

Why has the media been so complicit in destroying Arthur Greer?

Why has Sharons father committed suicide? Yes became POI of police. But why would you accuse a father of killing his daughter?

It seems such willy nilly behavior on behalf of police to allege Sharons father kill his daughter. What was the motive claimed by police?

Surely you would stay and fight for justice! Other underlying issues?

 

[Melsy]

What is relevance of discovery date and her birthdate and her marriage date. Therein lies the propensity proof.

How do you control a discovery date when a drainer found the body when digging up a carpark? The drainer did not find the body?

Is the entire media compilation a lie? The witnesses lied?

How can perpetuation of such a grand concoction of lies gain so much momentum? One man not perfect, but solely character destroyed by so many people.

Looking forward to the presentation of material facts to the new AG. Its going to be a cracker. This will take the Glyde st Bermuda Triangle injustice to a whole new level.

There's another book in this for someone. The entire justice system, corrupt from start to finish. They go their man - didn't they?

If his past records are found to be inflated, what a grave injustice to Greer let alone the victim, and a perpetrator living free!!!!

 

[Melsy]

I just can't work out if this is laziness, budgetary constraints or corruption. Maybe all of the above. Not just the number of injustice, but the spatial density of utensil ups!

In spatial modelling terms, these utensil ups were almost on top of each other.

Lets get Paddy!!!

If so, what an embarrassment. What was the outcome of the CCC Inquiry again? One lawyers wife dead wasn't it? Buried in Kings Park she was.

So who would be pissed at a lawyer representing a cop in a CCC Inquiry?

What a royal utensil up!!

In this case, the killer is running free, decades later.

 

[Beatnicked]

Why has Jane given incorrect testimony - to appease police?

What is the real story? Why has Jane changed her story? What is the truth and what is fiction? Is it all fiction? Even Fremantle Markets?

The 3 girls were supposed to have purchased a tshirt at the markets and had them printed. After 1 girl left for the dentist Sharon and Jane then went into Freo central so Jane could look at bathers. We have never seen evidence if the tshirts. Nor statements from people in shops.

It was also Jane's sis's birthday and she was looking for a gift.

After Sharon got off the bus Jane continued on bus to another shop complex in Peppi Grove and then she and the dentist girl met up and went to the beach in the arvo. Pretty busy day for 39 degrees. Both of these girls lived in mossie park.

The cops premarked the false point for the bus stop opposite the post office / stuart stop a map used at 2 trials and prelim and Jane testified that was correct. Her sis used to go out with a cop who was on the case in 1983 but we don't know if the friendship was on the go in 1983.

Jane's testimony is in question.

 

[Beatnicked]

I just can't work out if this is laziness, budgetary constraints or corruption. Maybe all of the above. Not just the number of injustice, but the spatial density of utensil ups!

In spatial modelling terms, these utensil ups were almost on top of each other.

Lets get Paddy!!!

If so, what an embarrassment. What was the outcome of the CCC Inquiry again? One lawyers wife dead wasn't it? Buried in Kings Park she was.

So who would be pissed at a lawyer representing a cop in a CCC Inquiry?

What a royal utensil up!!

In this case, the killer is running free, decades later.

You got it and the lawyer's wife's car was left outside the home of the last lawyer to represent the convicted man in a failed appeal in 1996. Not inferring anything against defense lawyers or the Rayney family.
The propensity works in this case too!

You got it! So monumental it leaves people speechless.

 

[Beatnicked]

How do you control a discovery date when a drainer found the body when digging up a carpark? The drainer did not find the body?

Is the entire media compilation a lie? The witnesses lied?

How can perpetuation of such a grand concoction of lies gain so much momentum? One man not perfect, but solely character destroyed by so many people.

Looking forward to the presentation of material facts to the new AG. Its going to be a cracker. This will take the Glyde st Bermuda Triangle injustice to a whole new level.

There's another book in this for someone. The entire justice system, corrupt from start to finish. They go their man - didn't they?

If his past records are found to be inflated, what a grave injustice to Greer let alone the victim, and a perpetrator living free!!!!

The remains were placed in a deliberate position to be discovered. It was the last day the bobcat operator was due to be on site. He was not the person you refer to as a drainer.

THERE WAS NO CARPARK DUG UP BEHIND 600.

 

[Beatnicked]

How do you control a discovery date when a drainer found the body when digging up a carpark? The drainer did not find the body?

Is the entire media compilation a lie? The witnesses lied?

How can perpetuation of such a grand concoction of lies gain so much momentum? One man not perfect, but solely character destroyed by so many people.

Looking forward to the presentation of material facts to the new AG. Its going to be a cracker. This will take the Glyde st Bermuda Triangle injustice to a whole new level.

There's another book in this for someone. The entire justice system, corrupt from start to finish. They go their man - didn't they?

If his past records are found to be inflated, what a grave injustice to Greer let alone the victim, and a perpetrator living free!!!!

The person born in 1957 had recorded history of false allegations against other men!

There will only be one official authorised record of the Greer case.

The grand concoction as you have referred to spread out like oil on water because of the false story that was put out there about Greer's background and the false story about the mutilation of the remains. All evidence that went against those falsehoods was withheld from defense. The manipulation of the media nailed the case. The manipulation of evidence by police nailed the case. The perps were banging away at the media as well and still do.

Arthur Greer loved his family dearly and did everything possible to make his extremely demanding and manipulative wife happy. He was a very proud man. He bought the shop so 2 of his daughters would have a better future. The 3rd daughter was a stay at home lady who babysat the oldest sisters child for nonpayment. Waitedcatvhome wsiting forcthe child to be delivered 1xweek exactly after Sharon disappeared with no advice her 'sister' was moving even though the babysitting arrangement was on the Friday too. He fully funded the purchase and restocking. Greer paid these 2 sisters a good wage. They all had picnics together including his ex and her 2nd husband. They kept Greer close.

The family immigrated to Australia in 1966 at the wife's insistence. They moved back to the UK again at her insistence in 1969. Funny about that. Then they moved back to Oz in 1974 funny about that. at her insistence and all hell broke loose.

This story is truly heartbreaking. This man has fought with all his might to prove his innocence. He was never able to uncover the evidence that proved his innocence due to the restrictions placed on prisoners receiving crime scene evidence.

Justice will be fully served for the victim and Arthur Greer.

 

[Beatnicked]

Sharons father would have been able to reconcile some of Sharons movements. Certainly a return time, as he was working at a polling booth in Mosman Park. Unfortunately Sharons father committed suicide.

So can Sharons mother reconcile Sharons movements or anything that Jane said or did Sharons mother just go along with Janes story?

Why has the media been so complicit in destroying Arthur Greer?

Why has Sharons father committed suicide? Yes became POI of police. But why would you accuse a father of killing his daughter?

It seems such willy nilly behavior on behalf of police to allege Sharons father kill his daughter. What was the motive claimed by police?

Surely you would stay and fight for justice! Other underlying issues?

Did Sharon's father really commit suicide? Michael knew something because he searched the squash courts on the night she disappeared. This search occurred before a witness came forward that out Sharon at the courts that afternoon. Police made a reenactment 4 days later of this sighting we have a copy. Sharons mother details Michael's actions in her manuscript.

The date propensity is at play between the abduction day, Michael's death and April's death this year and her 2nd husbands death.

 

[one eyed spy]

Thank you Beatnicked!
I wish you the best of luck.

 

[Willow weeps]

That is a totally different person and is a witness that came forward on the day Sharon disappeared and made contact with police. The police withheld this information from defense. The police have a recording of this witness and refuse to hand it over.

what aresholes, they need to stop playing god & finally admit they screwed up

 

[sprockets]

You have a vital fact in incorrect. Daughter? Who is the father? When was her non bio father born? What is her birthdate? What is her mother's birthdate? What was the correct date of marriage in 1957? What was decree nisi grant date in 1978? Who filed for divorce? What date was that? Who lodged the UK offense? What happened 9 days later after decree nisi? Who was that person connected to? What date is that connected to?

What is the propensity?

There is definite proof the convicted man had no idea of the propensity! The propensity is used by others.

Who had motive?

"Greer’s daughters — Susan and Chrissy — are bitterly divided over their father’s case.

Susan is brutal when it comes to her father. She told 60 Minutes he was convicted of indecently assaulting her when she was just seven years old.

“I can tell you he was a paedophile,” Susan told 60 Minutes."

https://www.news.com.au/national/co...e/news-story/e0b391b425760436ec2aec8f6ae7b5f9

I'd have thought the real vital fact is that he sexually assaulted her. The rest is just muddying the waters.

Tell us Beatnicked, what do you think of the first appeal grounds that there was no evidence the body was in two pieces when it was buried? Was that true or was it a lie?

 

[Melsy]

The remains were placed in a deliberate position to be discovered. It was the last day the bobcat operator was due to be on site. He was not the person you refer to as a drainer.

THERE WAS NO CARPARK DUG UP BEHIND 600.

Yeah, sorry, I'm a victim of inaccurate news media stories. I don't have the information you have at hand.

Looking forward to the big day.

Yes, that crossed my mind. Sharons father murdered also.