Beatnicked
Club Legend
- Jul 30, 2018
- 1,206
- 1,520
- AFL Club
- West Coast
"Greer’s daughters — Susan and Chrissy — are bitterly divided over their father’s case.
Susan is brutal when it comes to her father. She told 60 Minutes he was convicted of indecently assaulting her when she was just seven years old.
“I can tell you he was a paedophile,” Susan told 60 Minutes."
https://www.news.com.au/national/co...e/news-story/e0b391b425760436ec2aec8f6ae7b5f9
I'd have thought the real vital fact is that he sexually assaulted her. The rest is just muddying the waters.
Tell us Beatnicked, what do you think of the first appeal grounds that there was no evidence the body was in two pieces when it was buried? Was that true or was it a lie?
Firstly you do the math given you highlighted certain passages in the article. Born in 1957 and wrongful conviction 1969. Is that 7 years? Did someone at 60 Minutes fail math? A perfect example of media putting out totally false information to support a headline and grab at marketing dollars and sensationalize with no ability for the convicted to correct before or after publishing.
What was the purpose of stating 7 years? Was it to further the public bashing and to cause more pain and humiliation directly to the convicted man?
Did Susan actually utter the words 7 years? Did she receive payment for that interview?
To answer your leading question. I don't 'think' anything.
Last edited: