- Banned
- #201
I read that you can get a hard copy of the cert from your GP (though does anyone over 13 not have a smart phone?)
Many older people dislike them.
Bit of a pain in the ass carrying a hardcopy around everywhere.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I read that you can get a hard copy of the cert from your GP (though does anyone over 13 not have a smart phone?)
I was told it was required well before this week's mandatory rules hence am unsure. Perhaps that was the specific hospitals rules.
I attempted to clarify using the word much to indicate a large number of people Not a percentage
I gave up Chief, I wrote my whole rant in capitols and can't be bothered writing it out again, the argument is dead anyway, lots of oldies were dying that why the figures can never be correct what ever you and I think, dying with or of , are two different things. It is true about everything being put down as COVID, when it exploded in the USA I heard it on American news , now we all know that media all over the world are full of it. So not much point any more!
Many older people dislike them.
Bit of a pain in the ass carrying a hardcopy around everywhere.
Righto well fu**en sit at home then
Because they have to carry a piece of paper around?
Also some people getting fed up with having their every movement tracked by Google etc. Those people probably have feature phones at best.Many older people dislike them.
Bit of a pain in the ass carrying a hardcopy around everywhere.
Honestly it is the s**t that I used to rail against, and the government centralised medical data system failure is piggy-backing on the need for vaccination proof. But we’re in it now and I agree there isn’t much alternative. Hopefully the government doesn’t completely * it up.Honestly it seems like a small sacrifice to make to get everyone out and about and support local businesses (at the very least). I'm not sure what the alternative is.
Point of care tests often poor. Eg point of care troponin I can’t recall any being positive on formal troponin. I would suspect the poc antibody to be n9 betterPCR tests and rapid antigen tests are not reliable but they are extensively being used.
A positive rapid antigen result generally needs to be confirmed with a PCR test (like today's Richmond AFLW player), as does as a negative result in a symptomatic patient.
PCR tests show a lot of false positives as they can't differentiate between inert and live vaccine material. There can also be cross contamination as it detects other viruses that are present. Remember Essendon player Conor McKenna testing negative, positive, negative within a couple of days?
Point-of-care serology antibody tests won't tell you if someone is infectious. But within a few minutes they can indicate if someone has antibodies from past exposure to SARS-CoV-2. The TGA is dragging its heels in regards to the implementation of antibody tests.
Tom McDonald spoke out against mandatory vax too
Unproven?Good on him; while the hell an individual should be forced to take an unproven vaccine is beyond me.
You did quote correctly off the site just the site was confusing in itself.I'll check my numbers.
What I want to know is what % of the vaccinated people who initially held off didn’t actually want it & only got it because they decided it’s not their fight, they cbf and don’t wanna lose their livelihood over a stance.
Been saying it for a half a year how I don’t want it but will eventually get it to do things the constitution actually says I actually can’t be prevented from doing.. Like travel.
regardless of Aus law, which country did you expect to travel to and think you won’t require a vaccine ? And how did you expect to get there?
the constitution
Unproven?
that last half of sentence is confusing - double negative means vaccine should be mandatory?In terms of its impossible what the long term benefit/harm is of the Vaccine, hence it should not never be mandatory.
Good on him; while the hell an individual should be forced to take an unproven vaccine is beyond me.
that last half of sentence is confusing - double negative means vaccine should be mandatory?
Nonsense, it was adequately specific for the purpose of this conversation.That's not at all specific.
I think when Andrews said that common sense applies - what he actually meant was that he's done a rapid back-pedal on this and excluded all Commonwealth employees from the Mandatory Vaccination Directions.
Employers and workers
(8) For the purpose of these directions:(a) employer in relation to a worker means:(i) the person who employs or engages the worker; or(ii) if the worker is self-employed—the worker.(b) worker means a person identified in Column 1 of Schedule 1, whether paid or unpaid, but does not include: (i) a Commonwealth employee; (ii) a worker who works in connection with proceedings in a court, where that work cannot be done from the person's ordinary place of residence; or(iii) a person under 12 years of age.
You can always tell who's in the sovereign citizen facebook or telegram groups when they start bringing up 'The Constitution'.