Manipulating the Free Agency

flipper83

All Australian
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Posts
691
Likes
805
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
Thread starter #1
I think we're already getting a glimpse of how clubs will look to manipulate the free agency.
Collingwood has signed Lynch but looks set to trade out Dawes. They're players who play very similar roles but Dawes is 5 or 6 years younger so you wonder why Collingwood would be doing it. I think the answer is that they get Lynch for free and then by trading Dawes they get a decent draft pick as well. They've effectively gained a draft pick without losing out in their list. Then when Lynch is ready to retire there will be someone else they can grab via free agency.
I think we'll see more of these types of manipulations in the future.
What does everyone else think?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

flipper83

All Australian
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Posts
691
Likes
805
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
Thread starter #4
They are manipulating the system but by no means am I saying that they shouldn't do it or that it's a bad thing. Just making an observation.
 
Joined
Nov 22, 2011
Posts
34
Likes
22
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Brooklyn Nets
#5
I know what you mean dude, you're somewhat right, I just think the word 'manipulation' is not the right word you're looking for. I see the word manipulation as being a devious act, exploiting something in a way which is not the standard and would be frowned upon by others. That could be just me though.

To an extent I agree with you, but its just smart business....looking forward to the future. IMO, not manipulation.
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2007
Posts
1,875
Likes
2,499
Location
Brisbane
AFL Club
Hawthorn
#7
To me, one thing is clear highly resourced/wealthy teams win as do the players.
For sure, for the weaker teams especially Port, Dogs & North winning a flag just got much harder, (no disrespect to those clubs) they will be raided of established senior 22 players in the peak of the careers looking for an opportunity to win a flag or go to a big club. They'll replace these players with higher draft picks and the cycle will repeat endlessly. Clubs will already be targeting players a year or two out from now.
 

thedaz47

All Australian
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Posts
929
Likes
44
Location
Rockhampton
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
Other Teams
Man City, Wolves, Detroit Lions
#9
For sure, for the weaker teams especially Port, Dogs & North winning a flag just got much harder, (no disrespect to those clubs) they will be raided of established senior 22 players in the peak of the careers looking for an opportunity to win a flag or go to a big club. They'll replace these players with higher draft picks and the cycle will repeat endlessly. Clubs will already be targeting players a year or two out from now.
Add Geelong to that, along with Adelaide, West Coast, and Freo when players of SA or WA origins come out of contract. Hopefully Port can fix their brand with the Adelaide Oval move and also benefit.
 

Footy Mad

Team Captain
Joined
Apr 5, 2002
Posts
495
Likes
93
AFL Club
Adelaide
#10
To me, one thing is clear highly resourced/wealthy teams win as do the players.
Not sure I quite agree with that. Its very hard to judge after just one year. However, over the long term I would suggest Free agents are going to be attracted for various reasons

a/ Your club is in a premiership window
b/ More opportunities elsewhere therefore your ability to extent your career.
c/ Sadly, dont think you can rule out money or the "go home" factor

I think now its just easier to get where you want to go. However, its still up to the "chasing" club to sell the virtues of their football club or place themselves in a premiership window to attract the best. Power is now very much with the players eligible & less with the club and hence the fans. Hence why Id not be surprised if clubs and fans dont like it.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

headache1

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Posts
10,171
Likes
13,701
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sacramento Kings, Arsenal
#12
I know what you mean dude, you're somewhat right, I just think the word 'manipulation' is not the right word you're looking for. I see the word manipulation as being a devious act, exploiting something in a way which is not the standard and would be frowned upon by others. That could be just me though.

To an extent I agree with you, but its just smart business....looking forward to the future. IMO, not manipulation.
It is absolutely the right word. A lot of people do seem to instantly connect it to being devious, or exploitative, and it certainly can be. But it can also just have the simple meaning of cleverly working a situation to your advantage.

Oxford Dictionary said:
Definition of manipulate

1. handle or control (a tool, mechanism, information, etc.) in a skilful manner
 

Eastern Rangers

2015 Worsfold Medalist - Rowen Powell
Joined
Aug 27, 2006
Posts
26,895
Likes
11,265
Location
Perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Royals & Subi
#14
It's one of the reasons i have no interest in Wellingham, giving away good players for a journeyman while other clubs rack up mature age players of his quality while retaining their draft picks. Disadvantaged from next year and then the disadvantage grows year on year.
 

thedaz47

All Australian
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Posts
929
Likes
44
Location
Rockhampton
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
Other Teams
Man City, Wolves, Detroit Lions
#15
The salary cap will temper the richer clubs, every club can offer good money to attract big name players.
But if everyone has the same cap, I feel, you'll find that players will prioritise big clubs with the best facilities and crowds. Judd was the harbinger, for mine.
 
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Posts
2,891
Likes
513
Location
Vic
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
Fins,Rovers,Sharks,Cards,Pistons
#16
Is anyone else of the opinion that clubs shouldn't receive compo from the afl for a FA leaving? Hardly seems fair that 2 teams can influence the draft of 16 others.

Harsh on the team that lost a player, but ends up ridiculous if say 4 teams all lose a good player, all get mid 1st round compensation and suddenly the difference between 9th and 10th is 5 picks rather than 1.
 

Docker Dolph

All Australian
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Posts
611
Likes
125
Location
Behind the couch.
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
East Freo, RedSox, Bengals.
#18
The only manipulation I'm seeing is the Monfries thing with Port. The might not FA him to max the comp they get for their lost FA's and trade for him instead.

Smart considering Ess won't ask too much for him and PA could probably get him in the PSD too.

That's much closer to manipulation than the OP and its clever thinking from them.
 
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Posts
2,891
Likes
513
Location
Vic
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
Fins,Rovers,Sharks,Cards,Pistons
#19
That is a very unlikely scenario given the highest you can get is a pick straight after your 1st rounder.
I didn't know that, I assumed that all this talk about pick 13 going to saints for Goddard was a mid first rounder, not after their first pick. My bad,

Though still not a fan of it :(
 

theGav56

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 11, 2004
Posts
18,398
Likes
12,616
Location
Bali
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Fremantle
#20
The other interesting thing for me is that FA provides an opportunity for a player to get a decent payday bonus. Trading out a player like Dawes will effectively reduce his earning potential over the course of his career. Perhaps a club could even use it in negotiating with a player. If a player accepts a reduced 1 year contract for example, which sees him through to qualifying for FA, and a healthy contract.
 

Andy Brennan

Premiership Player
Joined
Sep 4, 2011
Posts
3,609
Likes
2,284
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
#21
For sure, for the weaker teams especially Port, Dogs & North winning a flag just got much harder, (no disrespect to those clubs) they will be raided of established senior 22 players in the peak of the careers looking for an opportunity to win a flag or go to a big club. They'll replace these players with higher draft picks and the cycle will repeat endlessly. Clubs will already be targeting players a year or two out from now.
If you were a super optimist, you could argue that struggling clubs might benefit - get rid of players ingrained in a losing culture, use the picks well, and it helps the club rebuild. I don't think that's what will happen, but that's the kind of thing I expect to hear in AFL press releases if people start complaining about FA.

And anyway the rules in terms of earnings and years spent on a list have basically ensured the the majority of FA's are older players looking to change clubs to get one more decent contract/some success (Lynch), or players on the fringes at their club (Knights).
 

Tas

Premium Gold
Joined
Dec 23, 2002
Posts
52,068
Likes
33,038
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
There can be only one...
#22
The problem is dumb clubs **** it up for everyone else. WTF is Melbourne going to trade for Dawes? WTF is Port going to trade for Monfries?

Seriously... there is always someone doing something stupid.
 

Theseventhhamster

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Posts
12,674
Likes
8,274
Location
Hell
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Milwaukee Bucks
#25
Exactly my point, us under Laidley and co in charge then were a liability to the competition giving hawks picks for spuds.
Fair enough, I'm going to assume until proven otherwise that Melbourne are looking for a pick upgrade for taking on Dawes' contract. :)
 
Top Bottom