Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Mark Blicavs CONFIRMED RE-SIGNED

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The "angry little man" may send Mitchell out to "accidentally" :rolleyes: knee one of Stanley or Blicavs in the thigh like last night with Walker, I'm sure Matthews would have no problem with that.
Two months :eek: have you heard something about Stanley that I've missed TC?
Aha- it's all clear now. Walker goes off at the 25 min mark of the 2nd Q, after his corky tightens. Hmmm.... I smell something very smelly here.

Screen Shot 2015-06-19 at 10.48.20 am.png
Screen Shot 2015-06-19 at 10.49.08 am.png
 
I have no idea when Stanley will be back- I've heard dates ranging from 2 weeks to 10 weeks, so anything can happen.

Fair enough, you gave me a fright though.

I hadn't realised that Walker got a corky. I did notice the 'unsociable' headline on the AFL website, though. Why don't they just come out and call the Hawks 'cheats'? We all know they do it. I bet Clarko and Matthews himself would love to get on the field and wreak some damage on occasion.

Did Walker get his corky when the game was tight and the Hawks thought they might lose?

The commentators are like puppets really, one person coins the phrase unsociable and they all pick it up and run with it, just like the time Richards called Geelong handbaggers and it carried over for decades.

Think it was in the third quarter from memory, and the game was fairly tight at the time ................ why what are you suggesting TC? ;)
 
Fair enough, you gave me a fright though.



The commentators are like puppets really, one person coins the phrase unsociable and they all pick it up and run with it, just like the time Richards called Geelong handbaggers and it carried over for decades.

Think it was in the third quarter from memory, and the game was fairly tight at the time ................ why what are you suggesting TC? ;)
see post above. Walker was subbed off late in the second Q after the earlier incident. I don't know when it happened.
 
see post above. Walker was subbed off late in the second Q after the earlier incident. I don't know when it happened.

You're to quick for me TC.
Happened a little while before he was subbed off, tried to play on but obviously was in a fair bit of strife ................. wonder if a bad corky can keep you out for a fortnight, wouldn't mind if he was missing when we play them.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

You're to quick for me TC.
Happened a little while before he was subbed off, tried to play on but obviously was in a fair bit of strife ................. wonder if a bad corky can keep you out for a fortnight, wouldn't mind if he was missing when we play them.
lol- I always smile quietly to myself if I see an important player is missing from an opposition team that we are about to play. I'll take any advantage we can get!
 
You're to quick for me TC.
Happened a little while before he was subbed off, tried to play on but obviously was in a fair bit of strife ................. wonder if a bad corky can keep you out for a fortnight, wouldn't mind if he was missing when we play them.
Damien Barrett mentioned the incident in his 'Sliding Doors' segment on AFL.com.au today, Cattery:
Sounds like the dirty sniper makes a habit of doing this:

IF/THEN

Screen Shot 2015-06-19 at 11.49.12 am.png
 
The commentators are like puppets really, one person coins the phrase unsociable and they all pick it up and run with it, just like the time Richards called Geelong handbaggers and it carried over for decades.

Yep, and while I respect his contributions to the game, I'll never forgive the little rat for saying it. Nor the legion of braindead fans who have joyously echoed it since.
 
Damien Barrett mentioned the incident in his 'Sliding Doors' segment on AFL.com.au today, Cattery:
Sounds like the dirty sniper makes a habit of doing this:

Glad someone brought it up (even that dropkick Barrett) about the only comment during the game was that he "protected" himself from a shepherd.


Yep, and while I respect his contributions to the game, I'll never forgive the little rat for saying it. Nor the legion of braindead fans who have joyously echoed it since.

Yeah, it becomes more then a bit tedious 30/40 years down the track that's for sure.
 
Nothing in the Mitchell/Walker collision IMO…..Walker came in to shepherd Mitchell and Mitchell jumped in the air to ride the bump. Givne there is probably 20 kg difference in bulk, I think Mitchell's action was purely reflex…

Walker initiated contact and copped a corky….shit happens.
 
Nothing in the Mitchell/Walker collision IMO…..Walker came in to shepherd Mitchell and Mitchell jumped in the air to ride the bump. Givne there is probably 20 kg difference in bulk, I think Mitchell's action was purely reflex…

Walker initiated contact and copped a corky….shit happens.
Agree. Mitchell is a sniper that deserves a massive whack but not for that one.
Taylor hunt springs to mind = BIG whack.

GO Catters
 
Sounds like he is further away from signing then when this thread was started. Rumours are that ridiculous money has been thrown at him. If it's a choice between him and Motlop I would take Motlop.
Unfortunately for you, no it doesn't and thankfully it's not.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Last I saw and heard was that Blitz was very close to signing his new deal and wanted to be a one club player. Loyality very big with him and his family.

The same thing I heard for Mots actually.


Now, since then ( last weekend) I have read ( only on here) that Blitz was offered a mega deal (like 4 million over 6 years) by the Doggies and Mots has been getting 700 offers like fat kids get cupcakes.

Now how much can actually be taken form these reports remains to be seen - but where there is smoke.

Blita also did say that his old man is his manager and that he expects it to be finalized in a month or so - and the fact that they don't get together often the reason it isn't done already.

Mots has a lot more reports of offers ( Blitz only has one im aware of).

Will get interesting fast I feel…

Go Catters
 
Last I saw and heard was that Blitz was very close to signing his new deal and wanted to be a one club player. Loyality very big with him and his family.

The same thing I heard for Mots actually.


Now, since then ( last weekend) I have read ( only on here) that Blitz was offered a mega deal (like 4 million over 6 years) by the Doggies and Mots has been getting 700 offers like fat kids get cupcakes.

Now how much can actually be taken form these reports remains to be seen - but where there is smoke.

Blita also did say that his old man is his manager and that he expects it to be finalized in a month or so - and the fact that they don't get together often the reason it isn't done already.

Mots has a lot more reports of offers ( Blitz only has one im aware of).

Will get interesting fast I feel…

Go Catters
Think you've got the order slightly out there Daz. Reports of big offers for Blitz were coming a few weeks ago. But the latest "news" was last Monday night (so five days ago) where he said it "will get done in the next month or two" when he next sees his dad and wants to be a one club player etc. It's as good as done.
 
Think you've got the order slightly out there Daz. Reports of big offers for Blitz were coming a few weeks ago. But the latest "news" was last Monday night (so five days ago) where he said it "will get done in the next month or two" when he next sees his dad and wants to be a one club player etc. It's as good as done.
effen jetlag….

GO CAtters
 
How the heck did you come to that dumb conclusion ?
FFS you are a massive DQ.Keep going and you'll be #1 on my secret list ;)

Like many others here, I'm morbidly interested in that list of yours JubJub........
 
Sounds like he is further away from signing then when this thread was started. Rumours are that ridiculous money has been thrown at him. If it's a choice between him and Motlop I would take Motlop.
Yes but you don't like Blitz so I'll take that with a grain of salt:)
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The Blitz is no chance of going elsewhere. Very confident of that
tomato_sauce.png
 
drama queen??? I'm not complaining. If anything slightly happy. Think we could get serious overs with a trade.
So let me get this straight.

We can't get a ruck on the park bar Blicavs.
We have ppl suggesting rule changes because he plays as a mid and goes 3rd man up.
He's played about 3 years after not playing footy for 7 years, and is probably leading the B&F.

But you want to trade him for 'overs' ?
 
Sounds like he is further away from signing then when this thread was started. Rumours are that ridiculous money has been thrown at him. If it's a choice between him and Motlop I would take Motlop.
Strong disagreement there from me.
Blic will be our B & F this year at current form levels. Easily.
His type of player is worth a lot more than Motlop, who is a game breaker, but has slowed down, can not kick left foot to save himself, and has issues.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom