Carlton supporter but shouldn’t have been a Mark of the Year
Super courageous though
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Super courageous though
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was it?
Really?
Look, although I personnally think there were better goals than Daicos', I can at least understand that there is some semblance of a case that his was the best.Oh no, they have got both the mark and goal wrong.
Oh no, they have got both the mark and goal wrong.
They got them both right. Haters gonna hate!
Cripps' was the best in my view. That was an incredible goal.Newnes' was clearly the best goal
Nooooooooooooonsssss!!!Newnes' was clearly the best goal
There is a strong case for that.Newnes' was clearly the best goal
Reckon it was a good call.But fu** me, I'd be shocked if there's one single person out there that agrees that Walsh's mark was the best of year.
Was it better than Gray's (which wasn't even in the top 3)?Newnes' was clearly the best goal
Was it better than Gray's (which wasn't even in the top 3)?
Daicos' goal was also a matchwinner, which kept our finals hopes alive.
Was a good call.
Uh no. That's my all time best mark.Will go down in history next to Nick Riewoldt’s as one of the most courageous marks ever. Except Riewoldt didn’t run into two monsters in Dixon and Jones.
Well, evidently, it wasn't.Yeah, it was better than Gray's. Tighter angle, further out, in the wet. It was clearly the goal of the year.
Exactly, plenty have done it.Walsh's mark in real time looks epic, but not so much in slow motion!
Dursmaas backing into pack mark was just as good
Tried that and they voted krakour over walker few years backfu** me the weekly highlight marks for each round are pretty much all better than Walsh's.
The footy community might have to actually get involved next year to get the right winner.