Do you support the re-introduction of slavery (for brown people) and if we had a postal survey would you vote Yes?
However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46)
Or slavery for women only?
When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again. But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her. And if the slave girl’s owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter. If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If he fails in any of these three ways, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment. (Exodus 21:7-11)
Should we encourage the killing of sons for talking back to their parents?
If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and, though they discipline him, will not listen to them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives, and they shall say to the elders of his city, ‘This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’ Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones. So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear. (Exodus 21:7-11)
Or do you pick and chose which passages to follow and which ones not to follow? So your belief that "the gays" are not deserving of the same rights as every other member of society is not borne out of adherence to the bible but a conscious choice to follow some parts and ignore other parts.
If for example you supported slavery (I'm hoping that you don't). I would not accept an argument from you that you are justified in your decision to support slavery (but only for foreigners or women) and try to created some false moral equivalence that by my intolerance of not accepting peoples rights to support slavery, is somehow equal to people who support slavery.
The point is the bible was written thousands of years ago, with a general lack of primary sources, often far removed from the event itself. It has been translated by people through multiple languages and multiple times. Humans were responsible for adding certain passages and removing others. Society has evolved over time, hence while slavery was once acceptable it no longer is. Eating shellfish was once considered detestable, I consider Lobsters to be quite tasty.
The bible should not be taken literally, it is full of batshit insane passages, and society would be much worse if every passage was taken at face value. Use it as a general guide - treat people how you would like to be treated.
You are entitled to answer the survey however you want.
I am entitled to call you out for your double standards and think you are a homophobe who believes that gays are not worthy of the same rights and privileges as the rest of us. If you ever have a child that was gay, I would feel sorry for that child because you believe they are somehow a "lesser human", not deserving of the same rights as the rest of society.