Fellows, blokes
Fair enough , I'll come back when I've got something nasty to say
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Fellows, blokes
More pressure this week. We bombed it last week and again today. This week we really got punished for it. Last week we didn’t.I’d like to get your thoughts on how tonight compared to last week windows? Was the structure similar along with the skill level?
Willo looked slow for mine.While Cunners had a poor game, he should have kicked 2 goals and the only time we looked dangerous when he was running through the middle of the ground.
Willo looked like he was playing the 3rd tall role and didn't get into the game.
Too much depth on a list that has about a dozen proven AFL level players? Only at CarltonBest take-away from the game: we won’t have a whole heap of posters rabbitting on about what great depth we have because we have a few players who can dance with their sisters.
It is a preseason game and means next to nothing. We had no system and it follows we did not play to a game plan. Looking at the vision of Teague after the match he did not seem to be upset.
We clearly have doc and willo back. Martin is an addition - some watchers were previously suggesting he may not be good enough to make the team. Walsh does not look like having second year blues since that is a condition for mere mortals.
We are going to go fine this year. No flag, but competing for a finals berth.
Plus the fact they played a tag on him.
More pressure this week. We bombed it last week and again today. This week we really got punished for it. Last week we didn’t.
Didn’t notice anything structurally. TBH it felt eerily similar to games of early last year when we played guys like Dow in the middle. We got sucked into the contest and then beaten on the spread.
pretty aberage all round.
I'm itching to see Kemp play. He's that one kid who didn't join us skinny.Can someone explain to me why year in and year out, all our players especially our kids are all so skinny?
The opposition always has 3 or 4 first or second year players that look like they grew up throwing dumbells around while our kids look (and play) like they've never even seen one!???
Turns out they didn’t need him.Why did Fyfe not play?
Stocker didn’t join us skinny....I'm itching to see Kemp play. He's that one kid who didn't join us skinny.
We'll beat Freo by 5-7 goals in the H&A.
These games are called practise matches for a reason .....
Don't know if SOJ V Kennedy was solved today as the rotating forward - same for Setterfield V Dow for starting midfield, or Williamson V Newman for defensive duties - I could say they all played at much the same levels ordinary to bad. I think Cuningham V Lang was well and truly won by Cuningham. Newman looked rusty and Polson did his usual one good thing and another silly - but looks better suited to running straight lines looking forward rather than being a confused forward pocket. TDK V Pittonet looks to have gone TDK's way.
On the definite side: I reckon Teague's box has been ticked by Martin and Fisher.
Next week will be last chance for whoever is still in the mix as maybes - but Cripps| Plowman| Murphy|Betts|McGovern| Harry are all likely to feature and probably Marchbank as well, wouldn't be surprised to see Stocker given a run either - so today was an important test for some who probably confirmed their standings in current CLub order of merit.
Leaving aside team tryouts - I thought the kicking for goal was really poor- SOJ is woeful/Gibbo is worse and Levi was ordinary - Kennedy didn't get a shot.
Draftee cameo by the dark haired kid who likes to tackle was a highlight - don't rate the Richmond blokes effort in missing an uncontested mark in front of goals after a lace out to advantage running 55 meter kick from Cuningham - the enigma man.
Thats what i saw today.
Where do you get the stats from? The AFL website sends you to the app, which states that stats are “coming soon”.Cunners & Setters definitely disappointing...but we don't know their instructions. Maybe they played different roles, maybe they were told to play at a lower intensity to get the run in their legs.
However Cunners played around 75% game time, and it is a re-occurring theme with Cunners to get low disposals and flash in and out of games. Only 12 disposals.
Where do you get the stats from? The AFL website sends you to the app, which states that stats are “coming soon”.
When Cunners played as the half-forward/receiver, we looked our best as a team. He should have finished with two and should have contributed to two others directly.
I know it was only a preseason game but he needs to kick those, especially the touched one, and create the others.
It's time to stop giving him a pass on potential.
McKay, Wittering, Curnow from that draft - people are already marking Kennedy's card, also from that draft.
Turns out they didn’t need him.
Let's try to remember that if we plug in Cripps and Murphy into that midfield Cunners and Setters role changes dramatically.Cunners & Setters definitely disappointing...but we don't know their instructions. Maybe they played different roles, maybe they were told to play at a lower intensity to get the run in their legs.
However Cunners played around 75% game time, and it is a re-occurring theme with Cunners to get low disposals and flash in and out of games. Only 12 disposals.
He’s been given a “pass” because he has been injured. No fifth year player, regardless of position should be given a pass imo.I know it was only a preseason game but he needs to kick those, especially the touched one, and create the others.
It's time to stop giving him a pass on potential.
McKay, Weitering, Curnow from that draft - people are already marking Kennedy's card, also from that draft.
Thanks Aph and sorry about the language.Don’t bother he is goneski.
Alias troll.
Good review and spot on well done Parap.My thoughts from the ground.
They wanted it more, plain and simple. More players at the contests with more intent. They really targeted Walsh with some late stuff and off the play.
I was really disappointed with Setterfield, though he didn’t seem to contest many centre bounces. I was hoping for a lot more from him.
My doubts regarding Kennedy are growing by the game, he was really struggling. There were many times where he was walking / standing still while Freo were streaming forward, I don’t think he is fit enough. If he plays forward he is effectively a tall because he doesn’t create much pressure. I liked his recruitment at the time but now I have big doubts.
Walsh was our best in my opinion. He is absolute class, the composure of the guy is outstanding for a second year player. He was targeted by Freo but it is just water off a ducks back, his mental application is as good as anyone in the AFL, I love him.
Fisher was second best. There have been question marks on his defensive running but I thought he was excellent in that department, I’m not sure I like him at centre square stoppages too much as he can get brushed off, but he is easily best 22 and an important player for us going forward imo. He’s a smart player with great skill (albeit he is one-sided).
Doc looked like a player that hadn’t played for two years, very rusty. It’s just so good to see him out there and not injured. Last time I saw him in preseason (against Freo at Subi) he was awful and a turnover merchant. He went on to be All Australian that year.
Overall, you shouldn’t read too much into preseason games. Many were way too upbeat after our Collingwood game last week and many are too down about this result. Mind you, it was disappointing a few didn’t take their chance.
Lastly, I really like the look of Philp, there is just something about him that is impressive. That tackle was right near where I was standing, he plays with real intent and has great speed. I wouldn’t be surprised if he plays in the first half of the season.