Martin v Shuey v Hartlett v Ziebell (version 2.0)

[lmach]

Shuey overrated af just pads up his stats with useless possessions

Well this is just bizarre.

 

[avishka5]

Hartlett IMO is the odd one out in this poll.

Even Ziebell tbh. Martin is a definite a A grader while Shuey is not far off from A grade status while both Hartlett and Ziebell are very average B graders.

This is a very weird comparison tbh.

 

[HumanMeatball]

Ziebell is actually no good at all

 

[juss]

Ziebell is actually no good at all

Agreed. Couldnt hit a target to save himself.

 

[Matera92]

Martin def shouldn't be in this poll, superstar.

 

[Happy Mastenator]

It's Martin (superstar level) a reasonable gap, Sheuy (AA squad type) then daylight to the other two who are your solid performers but not much more

 

[Sol23]

Wtf are Ziebell and Hartlett doing in this poll

 

[Stevi_Tigers]

ziebell would be more effective if played forward. in the midfield he just bombs it forward without looking yeah it goes 60m but ends up just going back over the slow north midfield's heads

 

[Happy Mastenator]

Wtf are Ziebell and Hartlett doing in this poll

The first thread on this was started a long time ago, they all had talent, and flaws, back then, some have been better on working out their flaws, others have stalled....

 

[Snake_Baker]

Martin, then throw a blanket over the others.

 

[Happy Mastenator]

Martin, then throw a blanket over the others.

Wrong. Very wrong

 

[Jootube]

I think Ziebell is significantly better than Hartlett, but I don't think he's at Shuey's level (or Martin's obviously)

 

[Ozil]

Martin, then throw a blanket over the others.

Over Ziebell and Hartlett perhaps. Shuey is a very good player.

 

[Sol23]

Over Ziebell and Hartlett perhaps. Shuey is a very good player.

Not in the same league as dusty lets be honest

 

[Happy Mastenator]

Not in the same league as dusty lets be honest

Shuey is closer to Martin, than JZ/Hartlett are to Shuey

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...2=15&type=A&pid1=3124&pid2=3316&fid1=S&fid2=S

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...2=13&type=A&pid1=3124&pid2=3115&fid1=S&fid2=S

 

[RobbyRoy]

Shuey has been excellent for a while now but I find it unbelievable that 47 people actually voted for Hartlett or Ziebell here. Goes to show you can't take too much out of these poll results.

 

[Happy Mastenator]

Let's just say North fans have been conspicuously absent from this thread for a while now. Even they can't defend jz anymore

 

[King_Tredrea]

Hartlett is an odd case that does make him the odd man out. He should be one of the AFL's legitimate thoroughbred mids but instead he's a flanker *shrugs*

 

[TheFVK]

Yeah this thread turned to s**t. Was a good race until Ziebell and HH took each other out at the turn

 

[Gosha]

Martin is so far ahead of Shuey who is so far ahead of HH and Ziebell

 

[WCEbrody]

Martin is so far ahead of Shuey who is so far ahead of HH and Ziebell

Pretty much.

Martin is a top 5 player with the potential to be #1

Shuey is an AA 40 man squad, might make the 22 type of player.

Ziebell can't find the pill and doesn't use it well when he does.

Hartlett is still that guy that occasionally bombs a goal from the centre square, but doesn't do a whole lot.

 

[Engimal v3]

Ziebell for mine.

 

[juss]

Ziebell for mine.

Can't argue with that.
/thread

 

[kaiserchief13]

It's a very clear 1st being Martin and 2nd being Shuey now.

3rd/4th is a bit of a toss up but I would say Ziebell's high performance games are a lot higher than Hartlett's so I wold rank Ziebell 3 and Hartlett 4

 

[Engimal v3]

It's a very clear 1st being Martin and 2nd being Shuey now.

3rd/4th is a bit of a toss up but I would say Ziebell's high performance games are a lot higher than Hartlett's so I wold rank Ziebell 3 and Hartlett 4

Yep, pretty accurate.
Martin >>> Shuey >> Ziebell > Hartlett