tigerfan12
Rookie
- Jun 3, 2010
- 49
- 1
- AFL Club
- Richmond
both young ball winning mids.
take your pick.
take your pick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I voted Palmer solely because this is a stupid poll and you did it just to ease your insecurities.
Palmers game on the weekend showed what he is capable of. Now as much as people have talked Martin up he hasn't done half asuch as Palmer did in his first year
Palmer won the rising star Martin won't win one.
Palmer-----> Martin
Maybe because he's ineligible. He'd probably win it if he wasn't rubbed out.
We'll see about that.Maybe because he's ineligible. He'd probably win it if he wasn't rubbed out.
He'd barely be running top 5.
Rhys won his over guys like Rioli, Cotchin and Kruezer.
This years rising star pool isn't exactly a standout.
He'd barely be running top 5.
Rhys won his over guys like Rioli, Cotchin and Kruezer.
This years rising star pool isn't exactly a standout.
We'll see about that.
We'll see about that.
Are you nutty? Rhys won't be a star player but Trengove, Scully, Martin, Bastinac, Ziebell, Hanneberry and others all will be.
Palmer just for teh lulz
Name 5 that are better.
I think this is just another "I play for Richmond so i will be a superstar" thread. Where has all the 'Cotchin is better than everyone' theads gone?
1st year vs 1st year and Martin isnt shown on the radar.
Off the top of my head for this season:
Scully, Trengove, Hannebery.
Rockliff, Bastanic and Nic-Nat have claims to it aswell.
Not saying he won't be better then these guys but they have impressed as much.
Cotchin will be better than everyone
Better than Martin anyway.
Scully, Trengove, Hannebery and Martin would be the four main contenders.
There's only 3 you can compare to him, so "barely top 5" is bullshit.
Nic-Nat, lol
Hmmm the difference between 4 and 5 is astronomical isn;t it?