Player Watch Mason Cox

Saintly Viewed

Premium Platinum
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Posts
42,605
Likes
33,364
AFL Club
Collingwood
Can someone please help me out with a simple question (which I think explains why Cox stays in the list)?

  • If Grundy gets injured, (say a neck injury and misses 5 weeks) who will do our ruck work?
Hence, Cox stays, that's his greatest plus to be kept on the list.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Joined
May 25, 2006
Posts
51,657
Likes
25,870
Location
Beach
AFL Club
Collingwood
Can someone please help me out with a simple question (which I think explains why Cox stays in the list)?

  • If Grundy gets injured, (say a neck injury and misses 5 weeks) who will do our ruck work?
Hence, Cox stays, that's his greatest plus to be kept on the list.
This.

Witts left for more opportunity. Cox will stay because hes not at the Witts level of ability to walk into another club and demand the spot as first ruck. And given the investment in him I think its fair to give him another season to see if he can improve or until somebody better comes along
 

loki04

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Aug 29, 2005
Posts
21,366
Likes
16,042
Location
BHill
AFL Club
Collingwood
Yeah agreed, its that unnatural goofy look he sometimes has going for a mark that makes us assume he takes no contested marks. If he can iron out that and take a few more of them he will suddenly become something to be reckoned with. Its possible as his marking numbers, in particular his contested marks, in the VFL this year are off the chart, way above the numbers anyone produces in that AFL. Will be interesting to see how much of that he can transpose to the AFL with time.
No, it's the many marks he drops when an opponent touches him even slightly. It is an area he needs major work in imo.
 
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Posts
11,369
Likes
18,152
Location
MCG
AFL Club
Collingwood
Moderator #1,279
I think the umpires did him a disservice pay soft free kicks last year, (Richmond game eg).
Now he thinks every-time he's touched he should get a free.
Someone needs to tell him our game isn't usually umpired like it's basketball and he needs to toughen up and focus on marking the ball.
I'd still persevere with him by the way.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2017
Posts
1,159
Likes
1,126
AFL Club
Collingwood
I have commented on this a few times recently. If anything the thing Cox can't do often enough is mark uncontested. He looks unnatural in a marking situation and because of his size we think he should take more contested marks but he does in fact take them.

An anomaly he probably shares with no one else in the AFL is his contested mark numbers are higher than his uncontested mark numbers career wise( closing now currently 23:22). That needs attention and if he got a few more uncontested and stat numbers went up his value would increase. He will get more contested marks as his game matures but its really not one of his faults. In a contasted situation he takes some of them and the others generally come to ground. That's not a bad starting point.
I think what Mason Cox has achieved so far playing our game has been outstanding and a credit to him and his family.
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2007
Posts
11,408
Likes
14,350
Location
Abbotsford
AFL Club
Collingwood
Moderator #1,282
No, it's the many marks he drops when an opponent touches him even slightly. It is an area he needs major work in imo.
I think those marks stand out too much because he is such a big man and we give him little credit and expect a lot of him in the contest

In the Hawthorn game he took 3 marks inside the 50, one he stood in front as a pack formed and was just too big despite a pack jumping around him. One other he jumped above Fas and Sicily and took them out of the contest and the other he ran back and jumped over Fas and Birchall giving Birchall no chance to spoil given Cox's size. Only the pack mark was rated contested. My point is all these marks involved some degree of contact and increasingly, albeit incrementally, he is better with contact. I dont think this problem is as major as you feel it is.

The other area which makes me feel he is progressing is the VFL numbers he put up this year

He has 5 games
Round 1 6 marks 4 contested
Round 5 8 marks 1 contested
Round 7 7 marks 5 contested
Round 8 5 marks 3 contested
Round 10 15 marks 4 contested

Averages 8.2 marks per game. 3.4 contested marks per game.

I am not saying he will clearly make it and on Saturday he was disappointing. Still there is improvement and the physical side of the game is improving. He is still very green. How much he improves I don't know but but I dont think he is as fragile with touch as he was in 2016.
 

ash84

Club Legend
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Posts
1,649
Likes
1,113
Location
Exmouth
AFL Club
Collingwood
Moore is just 21 though. Of course he needs to better and that will come with maturity . He has shown he can do a lot of things Cox cant though.

And Cox is now 26. Cox is as good as he'll ever get.
I think Cox will improve with every season.
Only his second season, a handful of games.
He'd learn from every game.
 
Joined
May 25, 2006
Posts
51,657
Likes
25,870
Location
Beach
AFL Club
Collingwood
I think Cox will improve with every season.
Only his second season, a handful of games.
He'd learn from every game.
As I said at the start of the year. At his age learning a new sport the learning curve is very steep. Happy for him to stay on in 2018 and prove me wrong but he doesnt have the luxury of the same amount of time that others get.
 

Frank Gallagher

Diamond Encrusted Unobtainium Premium Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Posts
9,526
Likes
12,363
AFL Club
Collingwood
I have commented on this a few times recently. If anything the thing Cox can't do often enough is mark uncontested. He looks unnatural in a marking situation and because of his size we think he should take more contested marks but he does in fact take them.

An anomaly he probably shares with no one else in the AFL is his contested mark numbers are higher than his uncontested mark numbers career wise( closing now currently 23:22). That needs attention and if he got a few more uncontested and stat numbers went up his value would increase. He will get more contested marks as his game matures but its really not one of his faults. In a contasted situation he takes some of them and the others generally come to ground. That's not a bad starting point.
Not surrprising re his uncontested numbers because no one passes it to him when he's clear.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Robroy22

Premiership Player
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Posts
4,772
Likes
7,635
Location
Jindabyne
AFL Club
Collingwood
Moore is just 21 though. Of course he needs to better and that will come with maturity . He has shown he can do a lot of things Cox cant though.

And Cox is now 26. Cox is as good as he'll ever get.




Huh? the guy is 2 years into a career...he'll keep improving as long as CFC puts expertise into him. He's just like a baby Giraffe atm...but he learns and he does what he's told...give him two more years of development and then tell me he's a dud.
 

Quicky

Premium Platinum
Joined
May 27, 2008
Posts
19,497
Likes
17,665
Location
Wherever I May Roam
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Socceroos, Melbourne Victory
Yeah agreed, its that unnatural goofy look he sometimes has going for a mark that makes us assume he takes no contested marks. If he can iron out that and take a few more of them he will suddenly become something to be reckoned with. Its possible as his marking numbers, in particular his contested marks, in the VFL this year are off the chart, way above the numbers anyone produces in that AFL. Will be interesting to see how much of that he can transpose to the AFL with time.
Thanks for this perspective. I hadn't thought of it this way. One thing that Cox does is goes missing and doesn't touch it for extended periods. And that speaks to those uncontested marking numbers you mention.

The Hawthorn game is a great example. He had no stat at all for over a quarter. Then shortly after that had kicked 3 goals. If he'd been more involved before then it would have been a well rounded performance.

It still doesn't stop him being a liability at ground level. If we're to play him I think we need to recognise that. And if it's to be successful put structures in place to deal with it. You can't play 5 forwards and have three of those Cox, Fasolo and Moore. It's no wonder teams walk it out of our backline. He needs ground level support. If we had good crumbers at his feet it would be an entirely different dynamic forward. But we have no crumbers. And it's a big ask to restructure a forward line to favour a player like Cox.
 

Countrypie

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Posts
2,482
Likes
3,272
Location
Ararat
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Kookaburras, Grampians Hockey
Thanks for this perspective. I hadn't thought of it this way. One thing that Cox does is goes missing and doesn't touch it for extended periods. And that speaks to those uncontested marking numbers you mention.

The Hawthorn game is a great example. He had no stat at all for over a quarter. Then shortly after that had kicked 3 goals. If he'd been more involved before then it would have been a well rounded performance.

It still doesn't stop him being a liability at ground level. If we're to play him I think we need to recognise that. And if it's to be successful put structures in place to deal with it. You can't play 5 forwards and have three of those Cox, Fasolo and Moore. It's no wonder teams walk it out of our backline. He needs ground level support. If we had good crumbers at his feet it would be an entirely different dynamic forward. But we have no crumbers. And it's a big ask to restructure a forward line to favour a player like Cox.
Great point. If Faz goes next year (which seems likely) Kirby would be the perfect foil for whoever plays deep fwd. Maybe he's the perfect foil already but to play KIrby you need to drop a small fwd and that would nean Faz, Elliott or a midfielder
 

10571z

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Posts
8,202
Likes
8,039
Location
Christmas Hills
AFL Club
Collingwood
Moore is just 21 though. Of course he needs to better and that will come with maturity . He has shown he can do a lot of things Cox cant though.

And Cox is now 26. Cox is as good as he'll ever get.
Do you actually believe that?

He has played f all football. Showed a fair bit in his limited time! Could easily keep improving although i would like him to be 24 not 26
 

jackcass

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Posts
15,792
Likes
13,355
Location
Bendigo
AFL Club
Collingwood
Great point. If Faz goes next year (which seems likely) Kirby would be the perfect foil for whoever plays deep fwd. Maybe he's the perfect foil already but to play KIrby you need to drop a small fwd and that would nean Faz, Elliott or a midfielder
I would rather we actually play a 6-6-6 structure more often than not which would alter the options for including Kirby. Still allows the HF's to line-up between wing and HF at centre bounces, and wings to line-up between wing and HB if you wanted a more defensive focus.
 

DaVe86

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Posts
9,493
Likes
8,926
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
collingwood
Do you actually believe that?

He has played f all football. Showed a fair bit in his limited time! Could easily keep improving although i would like him to be 24 not 26
I agree that he'll improve. He'll get better with every year, and may just hit his peak around 28 or 29.

But that said, it's not outrageous to say that he isn't a really good long term option given we might only see him at his peak for 2 or so years before he'll start declining again due to age.

Perhaps due to the lack of physical toll he'll have on his body (starting footy so late), that he'll be able to play deeper into his 30's. Not like speed or agility are major assets...and he won't get shorter.

He is definitely worth keeping on the list, even at worst as a high quality backup ruckman. But I don't hold out major hope for him to be honest.
 

10571z

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Posts
8,202
Likes
8,039
Location
Christmas Hills
AFL Club
Collingwood
I agree that he'll improve. He'll get better with every year, and may just hit his peak around 28 or 29.

But that said, it's not outrageous to say that he isn't a really good long term option given we might only see him at his peak for 2 or so years before he'll start declining again due to age.

Perhaps due to the lack of physical toll he'll have on his body (starting footy so late), that he'll be able to play deeper into his 30's. Not like speed or agility are major assets...and he won't get shorter.

He is definitely worth keeping on the list, even at worst as a high quality backup ruckman. But I don't hold out major hope for him to be honest.
Agreed mate. If Grundy went down and we delisted Cox we would be cooked. Cox is a decent ruckman. Obviously we would have loved to keep witts but simply he was offered more opportunity.
 
Joined
May 25, 2006
Posts
51,657
Likes
25,870
Location
Beach
AFL Club
Collingwood
Do you actually believe that?

He has played f all football. Showed a fair bit in his limited time! Could easily keep improving although i would like him to be 24 not 26
Yes.

I'd be rapt to be wrong and I've already stated he should remain on our list in 2018

Interesting you say "keep improving". I dont think he has shown much at all.
 

Deathray

Team Captain
Joined
Oct 7, 2013
Posts
419
Likes
420
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Seattle Supersonics
Always had great hope someone like Cox or Jason Holmes at St Kilda would do well and open the floodgates to usa athletes. A full forward built like Dwight Howard taking the game by storm like Paul Salmon in the 80s would be awesome. Reality is it ain't gonna happen.
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2014
Posts
1,994
Likes
2,635
AFL Club
Collingwood
Hopefully they haven't ruled a line through his name as a forward and give him a game again as soon as he kicks another VFL haul.

If the midfield could hit a target Cox would kick 2-3 every week
 
Top Bottom