Re: Masten = The New Chad Fletcher?
Well I thought he was pretty good.
Well I thought he was pretty good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
He started off badly, and panicked a lot. Seemed a lot more confident running with it and taking the game on in the second half. I think he's getting better with each game, one more pre-season and I think you'll see him start turning into the midfielder everyone hoped he would become.![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
83% game time on the weekend, could be the signal that he is going to play full time midfield in the second half of the season.
Or Schammer.
Yep a great waste of an early pick is Masten........
He is shit I thought he was about to turn a corner but has once again gone back to collecting easy behind the ball nothing possessions.
He could have had 50 touches and still done nothing.... he is not a damaging midfielder and unfortunatly never will be... just accept it I have.
or scott thornton
Really it shows just how much stats don't matter anymore. Cotchin is clearly better than Masten anyone can see that.
Despite his inexperience I have some reservations about his disposal and decision making. I believe that at times he clearly panics and often fails to accurately sum up the overall situation.
At this stage...........correct, with strength, confidence and maturity Masten has shown numerous glimpses of his talent. Masten reads the play very well which is why he is getting so much of the footy in his hands. He could be using the ball better but he will be very very good in time.Pretty much. His hurt factor is just very very low at this stage...
Yes. It's that hurt factor I mentioned. Cotchin can take a grab, win a hard ball, receive, deliver lace out passes from 60m away - do the lot. An almost complete midfielder. Masten is not, and will never be at that same level.
Indeed. Which is why he reminds me a lot of Schammer. Both as thick as shit, and came into the AFL with wraps as very highly skilled juniors. Both player's skills have not come with them. Both can rack up big numbers but kind of have a negligible impact on the game.
...or we had the first 10 picks in the draft or Johnathan Brown and Buddy Franklin walked into the club asking for a game on reduced salaries...this is the talk of shit is it not.Masten is shit. His skills are no better than Palmer's and he's less prolific. Bad mistake woodhouse, the godson should be a docker. Would have been nice if Rich was available in the 07 draft...
Masten is shit. His skills are no better than Palmer's and he's less prolific. Bad mistake woodhouse, the godson should be a docker. Would have been nice if Rich was available in the 07 draft...
As opposed to the other comparison we are always reminded of.You choose to compare Masten to Cotchin, that is a little unfair as Cotchin was selected at pick 2 so one would assume he was more highly regarded and unattainable by the WCE
Moo is of the same mind as well.Chops, you are probably the first Freo fan I have seen that admits Schammer is an okay mid, according to some, he can be elite.![]()
Masten average 17.8 disposals, 2.5 tackles and 2.4 marks per game.Anyone actually want to pull your fingers out of your bumhole and someone actually prove there point with stats and facts. Disposal efficiency for the year would be a good start guys
As opposed to the other comparison we are always reminded of.![]()
Personally I think Palmer is pretty much Chad Fletcher.
Can run all day, kicks are shithouse and he has a bad haircut.
Masten can spot a target up by foot, just needs to work on his finishing skills in front of goal.
Masten disposal efficiency is the same as Palmers over his career. And i mean EXACTLY the same. HOWEVER Mastens handballing efficiency when compared to his kicking is shocking. Averages a little over 50% for handball efficiency which is deplorable but his kicking is about 75% effectiveness. Overall disposal efficiency of 68% and 65 for the season. However when you take out the hospital handballs he and his teammates are experts at its 75%.
Nick Suban who is seen as dead eye dick by Freo fans kicking efficiency is under 60% however his handballs are okay and that puts him on 65% overall disposal efficiency, the same as Masten
And on cue. The floginess is refuted again.
Not by me. Horrifically over rated. So where does that leave Masten?