Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Cause outside of like 3 incidents Rojo has been clean as a whistle.it's kinda amazing Rojo hasn't copped bans this year considering some soft reds handed out elsewhere.
Refs are probably scared of him like they are of Zlatan.
Outside of Keane's 8 red cards and countless yellows he was a clean player too, right?Cause outside of like 3 incidents Rojo has been clean as a whistle.
But that opnion does require watching all of united games and not just isolate incidents like old #obessionforce
Because he has been.Outside of Keane's 8 red cards and countless yellows he was a clean player too, right?
You're not honestly trying to use that as sound logic? Turn it up.
But Cryuff is saying that he is dirty player because of those 3 incidents despite Rojo not actually being onebut that means absolutely nothing in the context of he should've been banned 3 times but hasn't been once.
kun hasn't done a thing besides his 2 incidents but still missed 7 games.
No i would call him a campaignerWould you call Suarez a biter?
If he commits a red card offense it's a red. George Boyd got done for spitting at hart when they were yelling at each other and had zero priors.But Cryuff is saying that he is dirty player because of those 3 incidents despite Rojo not actually being one
Do you think Kun is a dirty player because of 2 incidents?
no, but the initial point you make doesn't really have much to do with what was said. just that he was fortunate to escape bans, which he definitely has. especially in relativity to some of the decisions made this season.But Cryuff is saying that he is dirty player because of those 3 incidents despite Rojo not actually being one
Do you think Kun is a dirty player because of 2 incidents?
Every united fan admits he has been fortunate.no, but the initial point you make doesn't really have much to do with what was said. just that he was fortunate to escape bans, which he definitely has. especially in relativity to some of the decisions made this season.
it's just comparing rojo getting off 3 times in 1 season vs huddlestone getting a red for barely stepping on an opponents foot, something that is usually given a yellow. there really wasn't any more to it than that.
I am saying you're a blinded git who can't admit a player from his side has a bit of campaigner in him, whether you like it or not.But Cryuff is saying that he is dirty player because of those 3 incidents despite Rojo not actually being one
Do you think Kun is a dirty player because of 2 incidents?
I can admit a player has a bit of campaigner in him, Pogba, Zlatan, Herrera, Bailly, Valenca so you seem wrong there.I am saying you're a blinded git who can't admit a player from his side has a bit of campaigner in him, whether you like it or not.
I guess Suarez is OK from the biting too, right? Or is that different cos he doesn't play for United?
Sorry for bringing it back up but if this is the interview with Milner that City fans were having a cry about then **** me.