Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread Matt Rendell situation thread #2

Thoughts on how the Rendell situation was handled

  • AFL & Trigg hung Rendell out to dry-Extradite them

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • AD played a sole hand in this… and his sex life

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Trigg solely to blame-He will stop at nothing

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I will vote for Slippery Pete-‘winning’ policy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Situation? What situation? Handled perfectly!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Rendell is racist. He invented the 3 point line!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Trigg; the Angel Saint of the AFC-Can do no wrong

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • AD hated Matt; wanted him gone- The AFC bent over

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • KONY2012

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • My vote doesn't count…no white parent

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jack Watts

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • man_patto

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Who cares! Where's WALL-e?

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I suppose Vader when they tweet Mifsud's coming on to discuss Rendells racist comments, even before they have interviewed him, they dont come across as too independent
Given that he's been tried & convicted of the crime, I don't think it's too rash of them to tweet using language implying his guilt.

I'm hoping Mifsud tells us what Rendell had to say and explains why he found it so offensive.

I'm beyond considering that there's even a possibility of Rendell's innocence. Anyone still believing that needs to open both eyes.. and stop believing in Father Christmas, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy.

I want to know what he said - and why it was so bad that he had to be sacked, a penalty far exceeding the precedents set by others who made racist comments?
 
Assuming Grant Thomas was telling the truth...

Absolutely. I've never been a fan of Thomas but why would he lie now - when Mifsud is also his mate? And why would Mifsud "beg" Trigg not to sack him if he truly believes Matty was racist? So much still doesn't add up.
 
Given that he's been tried & convicted of the crime, I don't think it's too rash of them to tweet using language implying his guilt.

I'm hoping Mifsud tells us what Rendell had to say and explains why he found it so offensive.

I'm beyond considering that there's even a possibility of Rendell's innocence. Anyone still believing that needs to open both eyes.. and stop believing in Father Christmas, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy.

I want to know what he said - and why it was so bad that he had to be sacked, a penalty far exceeding the precedents set by others who made racist comments?

And why it took 6 weeks for him to be offended? And why he didn't express he was offended to Rendell & pull him up straight away?
 
Absolutely. I've never been a fan of Thomas but why would he lie now - when Mifsud is also his mate? And why would Mifsud "beg" Trigg not to sack him if he truly believes Matty was racist? So much still doesn't add up.
Nobody believes that Rendell is racist. Nobody.

That doesn't mean that he didn't make comments which are fundamentally racist and offensive, as a result of sheer ignorance. Is ignorance a sacking offence? Surely re-nedification could have been considered, considering the precedents?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Fair comment Ruscy but they have advertised it as:

"breaks his silence & speaks exclusively to @marngrook following Matt Rendell's racist comments."

Bit hard to see it going any way other than 2. I guess the proof will be in the pudding.

Well, it appears that all parties (including Rendell) have accepted that "racist comments" were made, so advertising it as such isn't worrying me all that much. Further to this, nobody has really referred to Rendell as being a racist, the word "ignorant" had been preferred.

If they advertised the show as Mifsud spilling the beans on that dirty rotten hood wearing white supremacist (exaggeration fully intended) then I'd be a bit more apprehensive.
 
Nobody believes that Rendell is racist. Nobody.

That doesn't mean that he didn't make comments which are fundamentally racist and offensive, as a result of sheer ignorance. Is ignorance a sacking offence? Surely re-nedification could have been considered, considering the precedents?

in context, his comment about one white parent wasn't racist (sorry Vlad, but you got that one wrong)

that leaves the idea of putting indigenous kids through scholarships with private schools, a la Cyril. Is that fundamentally racist and offensive?
 
Yep.. he's not loving my tweets.

Wonder if he'd answer if the timing was related to the Aust Post program last week, or how Rendell could leave the meeting not aware that he had offended - and was under that impression for months despite contact .... or what his solution to the problem is.
 
Given that he's been tried & convicted of the crime, I don't think it's too rash of them to tweet using language implying his guilt.

I'm hoping Mifsud tells us what Rendell had to say and explains why he found it so offensive.

I'm beyond considering that there's even a possibility of Rendell's innocence. Anyone still believing that needs to open both eyes.. and stop believing in Father Christmas, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy.

I want to know what he said - and why it was so bad that he had to be sacked, a penalty far exceeding the precedents set by others who made racist comments?

You see the bit in bold (i.e. the trial process or lack thereof and the extreme nature of the punishment) is the thing that gets me - not the guilt versus innocence. I have no doubt he offended the 2 guys so not defending his innocence. But the process from offending to quick summary execution really stinks. Vlad the Impaler is well and truly named.
 
Nobody believes that Rendell is racist. Nobody.

That doesn't mean that he didn't make comments which are fundamentally racist and offensive, as a result of sheer ignorance. Is ignorance a sacking offence? Surely re-nedification could have been considered, considering the precedents?

I think this is the thing that saddens me most. Mifsud had the opportunity here to make a real difference by talking with Matt, showing him why his comments are offensive and how they could work together to come up with a solution to increase retention rates. Instead he has made this public and in so doing, completely polarising the community and almost ensuring that this issue will never again be spoken about in public OR private for fear of being branded a racist.

You can see that many people are fed up with the "preciousness" of some that take offense at so much as a "they" or "them". Finger pointing, accusations, character assassination does absolutely nothing to help the cause. The motto should be "don't berate - educate!".
 
I think this is the thing that saddens me most. Mifsud had the opportunity here to make a real difference by talking with Matt, showing him why his comments are offensive and how they could work together to come up with a solution to increase retention rates. Instead he has made this public and in so doing, completely polarising the community and almost ensuring that this issue will never again be spoken about in public OR private for fear of being branded a racist.

You can see that many people are fed up with the "preciousness" of some that take offense at so much as a "they" or "them". Finger pointing, accusations, character assassination does absolutely nothing to help the cause. The motto should be "don't berate - educate!".

That is the problem - the AFL motto under Vlad is "don't educate - berate!"
 
Wonder if he'd answer if the timing was related to the Aust Post program last week, or how Rendell could leave the meeting not aware that he had offended - and was under that impression for months despite contact .... or what his solution to the problem is.

He actually hasn't answered anything I've asked.. just replied with the AFL line.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

As distinct from people like yourself, who don't want to hear that Rendell's comment were indeed racist (albeit unintentionally)?

Like it or not, I think there's enough evidence around now to support a guilty verdict. Whether or not the punishment fits the crime (and who was judge/jury/executioner) are fair questions, but I think we've moved past the point where Rendell's guilt has been established.

Jeez Vader, way to miss the point entirely.

I do want to hear what happened. I want questions answered, but apparently the AFL (through Mifsud) have declared that answers aren't important.
 
I think this is the thing that saddens me most. Mifsud had the opportunity here to make a real difference by talking with Matt, showing him why his comments are offensive and how they could work together to come up with a solution to increase retention rates. Instead he has made this public and in so doing, completely polarising the community and almost ensuring that this issue will never again be spoken about in public OR private for fear of being branded a racist.

You can see that many people are fed up with the "preciousness" of some that take offense at so much as a "they" or "them". Finger pointing, accusations, character assassination does absolutely nothing to help the cause. The motto should be "don't berate - educate!".

And this just tells me that he is unsuited to this role. If he of all people can't educate one of his old friends on a matter both are passionate about, how would be handle someone who he didn't have a relationship with and who was opposed to helping indigenous kids (if there is such a person in the AFL). This is a complete indictment of the AFL and its PC BS.
 
He actually hasn't answered anything I've asked.. just replied with the AFL line.

Yeah - just found you on twitter. Note you also picked up on Ali removing the inflammatory abuse of Rendell. #coveringhisarse #andytoldhimto
 
Instead he has made this public and in so doing, completely polarising the community and almost ensuring that this issue will never again be spoken about in public OR private for fear of being branded a racist.

You can see that many people are fed up with the "preciousness" of some that take offense at so much as a "they" or "them". Finger pointing, accusations, character assassination does absolutely nothing to help the cause. The motto should be "don't berate - educate!".

Add me to that list.

I'd characterise myself as 'left'leaning' and one who has generally supported the viewpoint of minorities.

But seriously this BS has simply gone too far when a bloke of 35 years good service gets the immediate sack despite obviously not having racist intent. Where was the mediation, education and willingness to explain?

Nowhere!

Instead we saw an amplification of the 'us versus them' mentality that will further divide the community. The method of response from AFL and their various pawns involved in this saga has further driven a racial wedge within the community far more than Rendell ever did while clumsily trying his guts out to actually improve the plight of indigenous footballers (if they so chose to follow an optional pathway to aiding their chance at elite football success).
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Add me to that list.
Instead we saw an amplification of the 'us versus them' mentality that will further divide the community. The method of response from AFL and their various pawns involved in this saga has further driven a racial wedge within the community far more than Rendell ever did while clumsily trying his guts out to actually improve the plight of indigenous footballers (if they so chose to follow an optional pathway to aiding their chance at elite football success).

:thumbsu:
 
Is there anywhere to find a copy of that inflammatory abuse aimed at Rendell?

not unless someone did a screencap... I didn't think of it.

... actually leave it with me .. there might be a way. (nope - http://tweleted.com/ doesn't work anymore)
 
I can not believe how much power this scumbag Ali Farhour has...

I have always been the most Left of centre person and will continue to be but let me tell you I can't help but start feeling some serious anger towards the power one group of people hold over another...

So another family member is part of @VolleyballVic - sponsorship arrangement I wonder?

They're all as bad as each other these days Freddy - maybe even worse.
 
So another family member is part of @VolleyballVic - sponsorship arrangement I wonder?

They're all as bad as each other these days Freddy - maybe even worse.

Well the australia Post logo is front page of Volleyball Victorias web-page on the right - but not listed as a sponsor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top