He had the talent to be top 30 last year, so he's an interesting one.
Struggling with the demands, of what is required to go to the next level, maturity. Good get if they can sort that out
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
He had the talent to be top 30 last year, so he's an interesting one.
I'm not saying that's bad value for Kreuger, what I'm saying is I'm stunned we pulled the trigger on that.
Krueger >>> McAdam. Krueger might be a star.I just don't think the value is there for the state players. Put it this way, #42 for Krueger and #30 for McAdam adds up to #18, which is where a PP might have been.
Krueger >>> McAdam. Krueger might be a star.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Probably. I like mine though, based on seeing NK live 20+ times and McAdam 6.This is what is called an opinion. I'd wager there are many different ones.
So we get pick 42 as a priority pick, what a joke. I said at the time what was the point.. Completely ridiculous.
Probably. I like mine though, based on seeing NK live 20+ times and McAdam 6.
I thought they might rookie him last year? Good get by Geelong.Would have thought Crows would have dealt for him if he was that good.
So we get pick 42 as a priority pick, what a joke. I said at the time what was the point.. Completely ridiculous.
You're right, no good players ever come at pick 42 or later.You should have kept Krueger. You dont have to on trade these players right. He is better than anything you will get a 42
Reckon we could have pushed a tad higher than Kreuger with a mid or KPD.I just don't think the value is there for the state players. Put it this way, #42 for Krueger and #30 for McAdam adds up to #18, which is where a PP might have been.
You should have kept Krueger. You dont have to on trade these players right. He is better than anything you will get a 42
SOS on the phones versus your gut.Reckon we could have pushed a tad higher than Kreuger with a mid or KPD.
Fair call, but I think there may have been an element of gamesmanship in quickly getting this offer through, largely built around that we don't care about the immediate trade result, merely what that can become a part of in other trade negotiations.SOS on the phones versus your gut.
I'll take SOS on the phones thanks
There is a bigger picture at play. Always is. Im not unhappy with thisSo we get pick 42 as a priority pick, what a joke. I said at the time what was the point.. Completely ridiculous.
You're right, no good players ever come at pick 42 or later.
"Mitchell McGovern (born 11 October 1994) is a professional Australian rules footballer playing for the Adelaide Football Club in the Australian Football League (AFL). He was drafted with the forty-third selection in the 2014 national draft by the Adelaide Football Club from West Australian Football League (WAFL) club, Claremont."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitch_McGovern
We still have one more to cash in... Lots to come yet. Be patient.So we get pick 42 as a priority pick, what a joke. I said at the time what was the point.. Completely ridiculous.
You mean on YouTube? Your mob are only showing highlights from last year really.Have you blokes looked at Kreuger's sanfl highlights? What do you think?
We must've thought he would go before 42, you guys obviously prefer a completely free pick with 42 or be able to trade it for a mature player
You mean on YouTube? Your mob are only showing highlights from last year really.
Looks a bit more physically developed this year, but lacks some of the agility he displayed the year before. Functional medium forward with scope to be a KPF down the line. Will need to find another dimension at the next level, because it doesn't look like he can overpower anyone with his endurance or his contested work at this stage.
Not sure he would have been take much sooner than pick 42, so don't discount the aspect of bringing him in for the very start of pre-season instead of waiting another 8+ weeks.
Certainly a better option than Menzel from a defensive perspective.
Not really saying much there, tyhe French Army is better defensively than Menzel.
Here's a good highlight package against other 18yos