Mavs,Suns,Celtics,Rockets have 2 more chances to get that elusive title

(Log in to remove this ad.)

mdc

Cancelled
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Posts
13,666
Likes
9
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
#29
You consider him more of a PG then a SG?
i read somewhere that roy can play the point, but i agree hes more of a 2-3.
Disagree peter, he plays primarily PG for Portland, and I believe that's his natural position (although he can certainly play the 2 as well). His best asset is probably his ball-handling and his passing, so it's only sensible that he play PG. I've never seen him mentioned as a 3 (he's like 6"4-6"5, no?).
 

peternorth

Facts Machine
Joined
May 6, 2005
Posts
82,664
Likes
38,614
AFL Club
Richmond
Moderator #30
Disagree peter, he plays primarily PG for Portland, and I believe that's his natural position (although he can certainly play the 2 as well). His best asset is probably his ball-handling and his passing, so it's only sensible that he play PG. I've never seen him mentioned as a 3 (he's like 6"4-6"5, no?).
ok youve got me on being a 3.

i still think hes a 2. blake plays the 1 position at portland.
 

mdc

Cancelled
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Posts
13,666
Likes
9
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
#31
ok youve got me on being a 3.

i still think hes a 2. blake plays the 1 position at portland.
Blake defends the 1's, but Roy is the primary ball-handler on offense...at least he has been in the half-dozen or so games I've seen. Same goes for J.Jack when he's in - guards the 1's but plays increasingly off the ball with Roy creating.
 
Joined
Feb 10, 2007
Posts
71
Likes
2
AFL Club
Melbourne
#32
i reckon the pistons will be a force for a while until sheed and chauncey retire.. they just need a decent center.. amare would do nicely but highly doubt that would happen.. nuggets are also up there..
 
Top Bottom