Remove this Banner Ad

Maxwell gone.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Using Puopolo's height (or lack of) as an excuse doesn't cut it. Free kicks are paid to guys his height all the time for 'high' contact, even though the offending player is tackling at what would otherwise be considered a 'reasonable' height.

Also, trying to argue that Maxwell is 'in play' for the sake of getting him off the intentional aspect is interesting. What is 'in play' now? Is a player setting up the zone 50 metres away from the ball considered 'in play'? Collingwood could argue something along these lines.

Also, this 'force constituted' crap is a joke. If they can somehow determine that Wellingham's hit on Simpson was reckless rather than intention, by definition it suggests that the exact point of contact (nose, cheek, jaw etc) isn't specific except saying 'contact to the head'. From there, one could argue the force the gave Guerra a perforated ear drum mightn't have been much different to the force that earnt Andrew Raines a slap to the face, that mightn't have been so different to the force that got Puopolo in the nose. The determining factor is that the ear and nose are far more sensitive to the same force applied to a jaw (if done, say with an open hand). 'Broken nose' or perforated ear drum sounds worse though, so something has to be seen to be done in these cases.

In short, there is a lot more to this than meets the eye and I would expect Collingwood to go pretty hard with this one, as Maxwell could realistically, whether you agree with it or not, be looking at 2 weeks on the sidelines.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Maxwell's bump was classed as a level three engaging in rough conduct offence. The MRP assessed the incident as reckless conduct, medium impact and high contact, after Puopolo left the field with a bloodied nose.

In total Maxwell drew 325 demerit points and a three-match sanction, but an early guilty plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 243.75 points and two-match penalty.
 
3 weeks is a fair assessment of the incident. should take the reduction to 2, leaving the selectors with a massive decision as to whether to bring him straight back off a break for the GF
 
Reckless conduct, Medium impact and high contact - 325points- reduced with an early plea

3 down to 2 if he accepts it.

different charge to what I thought - they've given him a rough conduct charge instead of a strike.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

3 weeks is a fair assessment of the incident. should take the reduction to 2, leaving the selectors with a massive decision as to whether to bring him straight back off a break for the GF

Would be a good sub - no disrespect meant, just the circumstances
 
3 weeks is a fair assessment of the incident. should take the reduction to 2, leaving the selectors with a massive decision as to whether to bring him straight back off a break for the GF
They won't have to worry as the Pies won't make it that far ;)
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Would be interesting to see how this was assessed if it didn't draw blood. I didn't think there was that much in it.
 
Thats a harsh penalty

For elbowing someone in the nose behind play??? Don't think so. I suppose Lynch doing what 4 Billion other players have done since football began and getting a week was not enough? Should have been banned for 16 weeks?? Hmmm??
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom