McLean VS Mitchell (neutral supporters only)

[TigerGlory]

McLean is miles ahead of Mitchell. Just like he is miles ahead of a heap of other midfielders in the comp.

On the topic, the entire Hawthorn midfield is still outclassed by McLean. The guy is an absolute gun, and class just oozes off him.

 

[Fastback]

McLean is miles ahead of Mitchell. Just like he is miles ahead of a heap of other midfielders in the comp.

On the topic, the entire Hawthorn midfield is still outclassed by McLean. The guy is an absolute gun, and class just oozes off him.

Have another beer.

 

[saucehead]

You really must be spewing you picked Cooney then...and griffen

no im not. im just stating players that get the ball e.g scott west are more valuable players than the recievers e.g cooney.

 

[TigerGlory]

Have another beer.

Cheers

 

[rick James]

no im not. im just stating players that get the ball e.g scott west are more valuable players than the recievers e.g cooney.

So you're saying McLean doesn't get his own ball, even though he averages mroe clearances per minute than both Mitchell and West?

interesting logic to say the least.

 

[H2F]

So you're saying McLean doesn't get his own ball, even though he averages mroe clearances per minute than both Mitchell and West?

interesting logic to say the least.

What can I say, you have them all fooled. Admittedly most of them are 15 year old donut makers, but you have done your job well.

 

[rick James]

What can I say, you have them all fooled. Admittedly most of them are 15 year old donut makers, but you have done your job well.

So you acknowledge I can present a point of view better than you, thus implying a superior understanding/knowledge than you posses.

Surely it isn't a stretch to say this superior knowledge and insight extends to football.

In which case, you should trust every opinion I have about football as being 100% accurate, as you did just acknowledge that I understand the finer points of this game more than you.

If you disagree with that, the only other possible explanation for the results, is that McLean is simply a better player.

 

[trueblue_91]

Just wondering why is every melbourne poll include Brock. WE GET IT!!! he is a fantastic player, a future leader, maybe even a brownlow meddalist if he can have that consistent year but there is no nead to keep on telling us about it.

 

[The Royal Sampler]

Amen to that.

 

[captain subtext]

Just wondering why is every melbourne poll include Brock. WE GET IT!!! he is a fantastic player, a future leader, maybe even a brownlow meddalist if he can have that consistent year but there is no nead to keep on telling us about it.

The majority are started by opposition fans.

Murphy V McLean: Blues supporter started it
Birchall V McLean: Hawks fan started it

I guess its a testament to McLeans status that everyone wants to compare their young up and coming players to him.

I'm sick of it too, if he's overhyped and has an average game everyone will come down on him and, as is already apparant, opposition fans will become Brock knockers.

 

[trueblue_91]

soz said it twice

 

[trueblue_91]

The majority are started by opposition fans.

Murphy V McLean: Blues supporter started it
Birchall V McLean: Hawks fan started it

I guess its a testament to McLeans status that everyone wants to compare their young up and coming players to him.

I'm sick of it too, if he's overhyped and has an average game everyone will come down on him and, as is already apparant, opposition fans will become Brock knockers.

100% agree with you. There is a huge rivalry between carlton, melbourne and hawthorn about murphy/gibbs vs mclean and burchall/franklin vs mclean. To tell you the truth who cares? How can you compare these people against eachother at such early stages of their carears. Murphy 13 games, Gibbs 0 games, Birchall 16 games, Franklin 34 games and mclean 47 games.

Not one of them past 50 games yet give em a chance.

 

[Demonheart]

Just wondering why is every melbourne poll include Brock. WE GET IT!!! he is a fantastic player, a future leader, maybe even a brownlow meddalist if he can have that consistent year but there is no nead to keep on telling us about it.

There are currently three 'McLean' threads on the front page atm, only one of them were created by a Melbourne supporter.

I guess jealousy is a curse.

 

[MinerBoy]

I'm a Hawk and voted Mitchell. So sue me.
Seriously though, they are about on a par if we can all be honest about it. Mitch hasn't had the strength of team to be able to play finals, and as such he cannot be compared on that basis. He has won the Rising star award though, after being drafted much later in the pecking order than Brock. (Different drafts I admit).

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

Mitchell by a fair margin I'm thinking.

 

[Cynic]

Unfair to compare after McLean lost the last year.

 

[H2F]

Mitchell easily and I am glad that this JOKE of a poll has been raised again.

 

[15Petterd15]

Mitchell is a better player now Mclean will be a better player in a couple of years time

 

[whelan=legend]

Mitchell easily and I am glad that this JOKE of a poll has been raised again.

We all knwo how much you miss RJ

 

[H2F]

We all knwo how much you miss RJ

I do miss him ... come back brother you were a worthy opponent.

 

[croady_fan24]

oohh We arent a loud to vote? pfft... Do you honestly think us hawks supporters won't come on here and vOte for Mitch?

Mitch is way better!!!!

 

[dutchy12]

Mitchell clearly had a vastly better year. Whilst Brock was somewhat dissapointing mind you though he did have a pretty badly broken foot and missed half the season still managed to come 9th in our best and fairest despite missing 9 games

 

[Deenamite]

Brock will be better next year though.

 

[huzy oner]

Mitchell now, McLean very soon.

How many standout years has McLean had?

But in saying that, I'd rather McLean.

very true mitchell by far now but McLean looks to outstand mitchell in the future