I don't give a shit how many games they've played. They are either good enough to be in the 22 or not. Disagree with you on the Fyfe/McPhee spoiled mark.. I think it was McPhee's mark and fyfe as the smaller, more nimble player should have stayed down. I'd have to look at it on the replay.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
McPhee
- Thread starter Gizza
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
I don't give a shit how many games they've played. They are either good enough to be in the 22 or not. Disagree with you on the Fyfe/McPhee spoiled mark.. I think it was McPhee's mark and fyfe as the smaller, more nimble player should have stayed down. I'd have to look at it on the replay.
- Banned
- #77
If you can find a post I've made about disposal efficiency in regards to Schammer I will send you a lollypop.
My criticism with Schammer has always been his depth of kicking and his decision making. Like all the crabs of past Freo games.
Amazingly ridiculous statement
- Banned
- #79
What use is DE effiency when your actions, or inaction directly lead to multiple opposition goals?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
IAMJUNGLEMUFFIN
Cancelled
- Banned
- #80
You're seriously going to argue that Grover offers more as a running player than McPhee?
You sure as **** are smoking too much crack man.
- Banned
- #81
So, despite Fyfe kicking more goals in fewer games than McPhee this year, he has been shitter?
Good argument. Also good to see the old school 'give an old crab a break' culture persists among supporters.
- Banned
- #82
McPhee has no run, and can barely bend down to pick up the ball. Got beaten to a contest by bloody McKinley, FFS.
He is rubbish.
- Banned
- #84
Sweet lord.
You really think a bloke running back with the flight of the ball has right of passage as opposed to a leading forward?
Played the game?
IAMJUNGLEMUFFIN
Cancelled
- Banned
- #85
How many players tonight, through whatever avenue, made balls ups that cost us goals?
How many of them have a troll thread dedicated to them?
The Emo crew fan favourites can miss goals from 15m in front, and there isn't a word, but if McPhee loses a man on man contest which results in a goal, the proverbial hits the fan.
That's not my point. My point is you are quick to slip the boot into your Freo scapegoats that you don't like, and defend your little favourites. All with very little substance or fact to back it up.
- Banned
- #87
Which man on man contests did he lose that we are criticising him for?
He certainly screwed a few that our teammates had covered by spoiling them with his dumb play as third man up.
- Banned
- #88
Plenty to back it up. A number of incidents in this thread have been documented where he screwed up crucial passages of play that either stopped goals for us or resulted in goals for them.
That kind of '**** up when it counts' play isn't recorded on the stat sheet. It might not even involve a possession. But McPhee was number one for them all.
- Banned
- #89
Well Mcphee had 3 alone in the third.
And JMF, I havent contested the marking contest he lost against Cloke was a negatigive, that can happen to anyone.
My issue in particular was his lack of sheppard, it was meek, after dishing off to Broughton, he allowed a Collingwood past him when he could have prevented it, and Broughton was dumped.
This inaction on his part caused a turnover and goal.
His effort running into Fyfe's space was terrible, that's school boy stuff.
To use the word unforgivable is completely acceptable.
Yep, I have.. but I've only seen the incident from at the game. Which is why I said that I "might have to look at it on the replay". Did you care to read that?
Some of us go and watch the game live. Then we get a better look when we watch the replay. Try it sometime Armchair Boy.
My arguement with your statement is this part: MCPHEE OFFERING MORE AS A RUNNING PLAYER IS THE CORE REASON WE ARE DOING SO WELL.
Now that is ridiculous
- Banned
- #92
get the mcph*** out of my team
kepler is streets ahead, coulda kept cloke to less than 6
and thats kepler ffs!
kepler is streets ahead, coulda kept cloke to less than 6
and thats kepler ffs!
The Brisbane game (where I don't remember him making a single stuff up) showed what he was capable of doing for our club, but it's just a shame that he can't do it consistently... I honestly thought he had turned the corner after that, but I'm all for a quick spell in the WAFL for him to find his feet (literally). In the meantime, we could do a lot worse than bringing in Kep - was very unlucky to be dropped IMO.
- Banned
- #94
Lol.
Putting a disclaimer at the end of your post like that doesnt excuse you from suggesting Fyfe shoulve stayed down because he is more nimble.
Balla's could be leading up at the footy, with Pav coming the other way, it would still be Balla's ball.
And Hoss, let's drop the name calling, if you havent already realised, I was at the game.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
IAMJUNGLEMUFFIN
Cancelled
- Banned
- #95
That is a terrible mis representation of my statement. Read my ****ing post again.
Here, i'll even type it again for you.
What does McPhee offer that Grover doesnt? Run, which is a core reason why we are doing so well this year.
Which part don't you agree with:
That McPhee offers more run than Grover.
or
That our run, is one of the main reasons why we are doing so well this season?
Mcphee has been consistantly bad and fumbled in most of the games he has played this year, both NAB cup and also proper season.
We have given him credit in a couple of games and felt that he has improved only because in those games he didn't make too many f+++ ups.
The fact of the matter is any other player performing like that would not be in the team.
If we are to proceed as a successfull club EVERYONE should be given the same opportunity and played on their merits and rewarded for consistant performance.
.
We have given him credit in a couple of games and felt that he has improved only because in those games he didn't make too many f+++ ups.
The fact of the matter is any other player performing like that would not be in the team.
If we are to proceed as a successfull club EVERYONE should be given the same opportunity and played on their merits and rewarded for consistant performance.
.
IAMJUNGLEMUFFIN
Cancelled
- Banned
- #97
Fixed
Was gonna troll that bit about kicking less than 6, as McPhee/Taz did it anyway, but i'm not sure if that was a cleverly hidden trap or not, so i went for the easy out
IAMJUNGLEMUFFIN
Cancelled
- Banned
- #98
Cool, so which part of that statement didn't you agree with?
Ok so bottom line would you pick Mcphee in the team to play Sydney based on his performance (not only last night but past 8 games)