read this in Yoda's voice and it makes a bit more sense
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
read this in Yoda's voice and it makes a bit more sense
Genuine question. In your work places, what is the mix of Crows fans to Port fans?
I find the militant bias perplexing sometimes. I get the amongst the older generation that reads the Advertiser, watches Ch 7 news and listens to 5AA that there is probably a significant weighting in their favour, but just in general life amongst the living, I don't see it as much.
My work place, and associated businesses, based in North Adelaide and with people from all over Adelaide (albeit a lot of Southern European heritage), it's at worst 50/50, but probably more weighted towards Port. These on the whole are professionals as well.
Is the Crows have the overwhelming majority of supporters in the state and therefore the ridiculous media bias an outdated concept?
One guy at work out of 100 who has heard of the sport of AFL - me.
Does attract a crowd when I chromecast it onto the lunchroom TV (night games start ~ 11am here). Fair to say any reputation I ever had for professionalism is no more since my colleagues observed me cracking tantrums at another missed shot 20m in front of goal or yelling what happen Port.
The split of self made entrepreneurs to employees between Crows and Port would be an interesting study.Barring a few notable exceptions, most of the Crows supporters I meet through work are what you would call 'establishment'. They follow the team that best represents the old school tie network that they belong to (or aspire to belong to). One interesting thing I've noticed with the Port supporters I know from within this social set, they are almost always, mavericks. Non-conformists, rebellious, and 'black sheep' types. Explains the two clubs' brands quite well, I thought.
I do have several mates/colleagues who are plain old football supporters who just happened to make the choice to follow Crows and stuck with it. For the most part, they are good with banter but I'd never go to the football with them. (nor would they want to go with me, to be fair)
Outnumbered, but not outclassedMyself and my boss are Port supporters. A couple of casual crows supporters and 2 Richmond supporters. It is a predominantly female work place so unfortunately not many really care. The previous hospital I worked at I as the only Port supporter. I am used to being outnumbered
The split of self made entrepreneurs to employees between Crows and Port would be an interesting study.
On SM-G960F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Smitho's been Dumpster Diving and Elspeth Dibber Dobbing again
Smitho's been Dumpster Diving and Elspeth Dibber Dobbing again
Take a listen to the full press conference, as previously posted in the Port covid-19 thread:
One of the reporters in the press conference asked Dr Spurier if PAFC were aware of the request for an exemption and she said she didn't think so.
That reporter also asked if the SA Health employee who provided the exemptions had a 'vested interest' in the exemptions. Spurier said NO, the employee had no 'vested interest' that she was aware of. Reporter then asked why that employee wasn't sacked for breaching SA Health rules.
The reporter isn't identified and it's not clear from which media outlet they are from.
But it is quite clear where our grubby SA media want this to go and the link they are trying to make.
The campaigners on the Crows Board are already in a lather:
"Will the AFL investigate? It's completely suss. Why would 11 family members of multiple Port families all get the same approval. There has to some sort of collusion. This is smelly smelly smelly."
"Problem is, all the dirty filthy gutter journalists in the AFL media in SA are Port supporters......"nothing to see here"
"Get Elspeth onto it."
"So SA Health gave travel exemptions for family of Port players to travel from Victoria. I don't want to hear from those nuffs nuffs about being hard done by and the Crows getting special treatment ever again. What a joke. Hang your head in shame."
Take a listen to the full press conference, as previously posted in the Port covid-19 thread:
One of the reporters in the press conference asked Dr Spurier if PAFC were aware of the request for an exemption and she said she didn't think so.
That reporter also asked if the SA Health employee who provided the exemptions had a 'vested interest' in the exemptions. Spurier said NO, the employee had no 'vested interest' that she was aware of. Reporter then asked why that employee wasn't sacked for breaching SA Health rules.
The reporter isn't identified and it's not clear from which media outlet they are from.
But it is quite clear where our grubby SA media want this to go and the link they are trying to make.
The campaigners on the Crows Board are already in a lather:
"Will the AFL investigate? It's completely suss. Why would 11 family members of multiple Port families all get the same approval. There has to some sort of collusion. This is smelly smelly smelly."
"Problem is, all the dirty filthy gutter journalists in the AFL media in SA are Port supporters......"nothing to see here"
"Get Elspeth onto it."
"So SA Health gave travel exemptions for family of Port players to travel from Victoria. I don't want to hear from those nuffs nuffs about being hard done by and the Crows getting special treatment ever again. What a joke. Hang your head in shame."
Meh, we'd all be carrying on the same way here if it was theadelaidefootballclub in the same position.
A reporter thinks someone should be sacked for making a mistake.
Why do I suddenly have visions of pots and kettles and glass houses?
Sounds like a good place to workAt my work 7 for port amd 1 for the cr9ws 2 dont care
That is correct but I wonder why such an astonishing "mistake" occurred?This has nothing to do with the Port Adelaide Football Club. Simple as that.
The thing is, they never had exemptions for that. They had exemptions to leave their current quarantine place and move to the Barossa Resort to complete their quarantine. As could be clearly understood by the Chief of Police's following comments they never had exemptions to leave their rooms at the Resort for training.Were they saying the same about when the crows players all got exemptions to train at the barossa golf course?
crickets