top work jay
meet Mr Rucci
- Thread starter RooDog
- Start date
- Tagged users None
For those of us not in front of a radio, what did you say basically and what was the response from Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber?
Hardballget
Draftee
- Jan 24, 2004
- 13
- 0
How about we **** off Colonel Sanders and give Jay the CEO job 
- Banned
- #29
Thank you all for your support; only I'm not the one who needs it. The process is not clear, we're kept in the dark and as members we deserve what is happening.
Why?
Because we pay $$$ to the AFC is why!! Don't kid us around. We all know what will happen when they make the announcement.
NOT FAIR TO THE SUPPORTER GROUP.
Stop bull****ting and announce it for christs' sake
Why?
Because we pay $$$ to the AFC is why!! Don't kid us around. We all know what will happen when they make the announcement.
NOT FAIR TO THE SUPPORTER GROUP.
Stop bull****ting and announce it for christs' sake
- Feb 7, 2004
- 1,725
- 691
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Double Blues, WBA, Adelaide United
Great work Jay, you have always been pretty much on the money when we have spoke... always nice to see KG blow yet another gasklet
- Banned
- #32
The gist of the conversation was that the process isn't transparent enought and in todays' business environment transparency is the key to success.
We are shareholders of a 'business' and should be treated as such.
Good approach. I can see why KG packed up if you were throwing two and three-syllable words around like that.
Count me out!!
I can't see any point in meeting with Rucci, as IMO he seems to be trying to create a certain aggressive attitude amongst supporters towards the AFC.
There might be dissatisfaction with the coaching selection process, but there is no rebellion.
Rucci and co are the ones that keep on pumping up Craig's tyres undeservedly and partially have caused the demise of Wallace as a candidate for the AFC coaching position.
Rucci has responded to none of the challenges for a balanced support of all the major candidates rather than a single biased Craig backing.
As for me, I'll continue to make my points in this forum, a forum that the AFC also read, and directly to the AFC using my real name etc
That way I know they will at least be acknowledged as they have been in the past, and not used against me.
I can't see any point in meeting with Rucci, as IMO he seems to be trying to create a certain aggressive attitude amongst supporters towards the AFC.
There might be dissatisfaction with the coaching selection process, but there is no rebellion.
Rucci and co are the ones that keep on pumping up Craig's tyres undeservedly and partially have caused the demise of Wallace as a candidate for the AFC coaching position.
Rucci has responded to none of the challenges for a balanced support of all the major candidates rather than a single biased Craig backing.
As for me, I'll continue to make my points in this forum, a forum that the AFC also read, and directly to the AFC using my real name etc
That way I know they will at least be acknowledged as they have been in the past, and not used against me.
- Banned
- #38
Originally posted by macca23
Good on ya mate - well done.
That bloody KG is a handful isn't he??
No sense - just noise!!
Agreed macca23
Having thought about it a lot more I can't disagree with anything in your post and agree with your stance in not meeting Michelangelo
