Melbourne supporters & the polls board

[ThePuppetMaster]

but.... north have less...

 

[Macca18]

They're all a bunch of glory hunting knobs anyway... would it really surprise that they have to resort to multiple usernames just so they can win an online poll that is seen by a grand total of about 40 people? They won a couple of games in a row this year and they've all come back out of the woodwork after pretending to hate all things football over the last few years considering their team would of struggled to beat most sides in the VFL...

Melbourne has epitomized pathetic for the past 45 years... on and off the field. Loser "We don't mind being second best" culture... the players from those great Melbourne teams of the 40s and 50s must cringe when they see what a rabble the place has turned into. It was all on display on the weekend when they decide to rest their two best young players against a quality opponent... "Oh we probably won't win so we just won't play them" - couldn't sum them up any better...

 

[}>-DEMON-<{]

Do you believe there are a handful of Melbourne supporters with multiple user names continually stacking the votes in Melbourne's favor on the polls board?

you are the biggest tosser on this board, followed closely by the bloke who (predictably) posted in this thread first

 

[Wonaeamirri33]

Brad Roo, just thought I should tell you that I am doing all the stacking. I am in fact the only human Melbourne supporter on BigFooty, the rest of the posters here are just my many alias'.

No, I must dispute this claim W=L. In truth, I'm the evil Demon who pulls the strings around BF, my army of dedicated alter egos is neverending... didn't you see those Bay threads earlier on this year?

 

[Wonaeamirri33]

And memo to Macca18. Please for all our sakes, buy a thesaurus!

I mean, you seem to say more or less exactly the same thing in each post I've seen from you lately, but at least if you used a greater variety of verbiage, it would make the messages more interesting for the reader...

 

[Lord_Travis]

I'm going to come clean here.... I'm the Batman!

 

[Wonaeamirri33]

Haha- yeah, the poor kiddies seem to think we're omnipresent

PS- Aliases voting 'yes' so far:

dramadine
madtuesday
Greasy Palms (highly probable, 0 posts logged)

Aliases voting 'no': 0.

How ironic!

 

[Demonheart]

Do you believe there are a handful of Melbourne supporters with multiple user names continually stacking the votes in Melbourne's favor on the polls board?

The obsession continues

 

[cannons]

Please don't use the word "if", it is a virtual certainty that they are stacking the polls.

This poll is public, so they can be weeded out and deleted from the proper figure.

All usernames for Melbourne supporters hiding in other club profiles can be exposed by simply deleting accounts created from July onwards.

A couple of interesting Melbourne user names that have rarely or never posted have already been exposed in this poll. They are most likely extras.

The vote currently stands at 15 - 3, which is over 83% in agreeance.

Although I believe in the old 'each to their own' phrase, I find it astonishing that you don't have anything better to do with your time than analyse the accounts of Melbourne supporters on this site.

By the way, I should point out that agreeance isn't a word, and instead, agreement should be used in its place

 

[Brad Roo]

84% of the no vote is made up of Melbourne supporters, giving us yet another brilliant display of organised poll stacking.

Congratulations lads.

The properly adjusted Yes vote is currently running at 87.5%.

 

[The Mighty Boosh]

84% of the no vote is made up of Melbourne supporters, giving us yet another brilliant display of organised poll stacking.

Congratulations lads.

The properly adjusted Yes vote is currently running at 87.5%.

Properly adjusted? Hardly- you haven't taken the alias' in the YES vote into the equation but really, what do you expect this poll to achieve? Quite a sad and bitter life you live.

If this poll proves anything it shows that with the organised vote stacking and multiple alias the Dees have used to rigg this vote we've managed a total of 25 votes - including some neutral fans.

Hardly going to tip the scales or explain how we manage to win other polls with 100+ votes in favour of the Dees.

But you keep taking shots- it must be hard to admit the Dees are far better positioned for the future than the Roos.

 

[Gazza_11]

As a matter of fact Brad Roo probably has numerous aliases with which he is stacking this poll. I'd make a thread, but that'd make me a w***er, like you.

 

[E Shed]

Just out of interest what does one gain from stacking a poll?
If I want to know how many neutral supporters think player A from my club is better than player B from your club I start a poll. Maybe our player wins maybe your does.
If I create 25 alias's and make my player win how does that benefit me? I know that without my alias's you player would have won so where's the payoff?
I mean rigging an election or something where one gets tangible benefit has some purpose but what am I missing?
Even if it's just Dick Measuring BF bragging rights I still know that I would have lost without cheating and that neutral people actually think your player is better.
Don't get it.

 

[Wonaeamirri33]

Very good question E Shed. But somehow it keeps happening. As we pointed out earlier on, some Collingwood poster (if he was actually a Collingwood fan) was sufficiently crazed that he actually created around 120 aliases to try to artificially inflate the numbers against us on a recent poll.

Then the same character created at least 2 more aliases to try to boost numbers against us on this bizarre and puerile thread.

It's obvious when you look at a poll that's been mucked with that way too, because you can easily see all the red ink.

Certainly seems like a remarkably pointless activity...

 

[Demonheart]

84% of the no vote is made up of Melbourne supporters, giving us yet another brilliant display of organised poll stacking.

Congratulations lads.

The properly adjusted Yes vote is currently running at 87.5%.

At first your obsession was amusing, now with posts like this it's just sad. Sad that someone can get so wrapped up and upset by an imaginary issue on bigfooty and driven to posts like this.

You really have to wonder how little of a life people like this has if they spend so much of their time getting upset by believing that people are stacking bigfooty polls.

 

[Brad Roo]

At first your obsession was amusing, now with posts like this it's just sad.

My "obsession" is currently supported by 38 other forum members representing 12 AFL clubs.

Current support for the yes vote is running at over 84%.

 

[Slattery_20]

When I see people getting worked up about the polls board here, I can't work out whether to laugh or feel pity.

 

[cannons]

My "obsession" is currently supported by 38 other forum members representing 12 AFL clubs.

Current support for the yes vote is running at over 84%.

If your calculations are correct (I can't be bothered to check something so futile), then the percentage of individuals supporting your contention has dropped in recent times.

You must be worried, given that this crusade against Melbourne posters means so much to you

 

[The Mighty Boosh]

My "obsession" is currently supported by 38 other forum members representing 12 AFL clubs.

Current support for the yes vote is running at over 84%.

None of those 38 other forum members felt the need to start this thread. They don't support your obsession- they are laughing at you as much as the Dees fans that get worked up.

All they did was click YES to stick it to some Melbourne fans for a laugh. You are the only one that really cares and has gone out of his way to do this- with no evidence other than polls between Melbourne and the Roos go against your team and you can't hack loosing to the mighty Dees.

You do have an unhealthy obsession with the Dees.

 

[Demonheart]

My "obsession" is currently supported by 38 other forum members representing 12 AFL clubs.

Current support for the yes vote is running at over 84%.

Exhibit A

Half of me wants to fuel the fire of your hatred just to see how angry you'll actually get, the other half just laughs.

One serious question, how old are you? The answer may explain alot

 

[hellfire]

I was accused by three Dees fans of creating aliases in the space of a few minutes. Those three were probably aliases. It is hilarious the how they patrol the polls board with a pack mentality, but I doubt they stack the polls.

 

[Wonaeamirri33]

Half of me wants to fuel the fire of your hatred just to see how angry you'll actually get

Sounds like a good option to me mate - pushing BR all the way through the looking glass, towards the dark teatime of the soul, could give us a lot of fun times

Already I can visualise him experiencing that intense tightness from behind that only comes from deep, enduring offended...

 

[Brad Roo]

86% in agreement.

80% of the Melbourne vote has been stacked.

 

[Demonheart]

I was accused by three Dees fans of creating aliases in the space of a few minutes. Those three were probably aliases. It is hilarious the how they patrol the polls board with a pack mentality, but I doubt they stack the polls.

What's hilarious is a Collingwood supporter talking about 'pack mentality'

I'll give you a couple of minutes to think about it

 

[hellfire]

What's hilarious is a Collingwood supporter talking about 'pack mentality'

I'll give you a couple of minutes to think about it

I do need to think about it, because I know you're not stupid enough to correlate the "pack mentality" employed by those who bashed Nathan Jones' father with all Collingwood supporters. So given that you're not stupid enough to use that as the grounds for your comment, please enlighten me as to what you're referring to. Is it supporters on BF? No, Pies fans disagree and condemn each other all the time. Tell me!

But what IS hilarious is the way you always deflect comments and resort to personal attacks.. similar to when you accused me of creating aliases to stack the polls. You DO go around here patting each other on the back, bathing in your shared sense of superiority because of some young players in a football team you associate yourselves with. Good on you though, I'll await your response to the Collingwood pack mentality.