Melbourne wanting to turn carpark into training oval

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Ned_Flanders

Premium Platinum
Aug 22, 2009
47,172
87,943
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
76'ers
This may very well be the case. But do you have a citation for it? Can you confirm that it applies to the areas where Melbourne's main supporter base is located? And as I said previously, it's not impossible to take the St Kilda approach and share the facilities, but I suppose that depends on what Melbourne are inclined to do.
This regarding the shortage of soccer pitches is resulting in clubs turning away players, with the FFV estimating an extra 260-420 pitches in Victoria by 2026


www.footballvictoria.com.au/sites/ffv/files/2018-12/FV_Facilities_Strategy.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwj0otGYncPkAhUTg-YKHSXQCncQFjACegQICBAB&usg=AOvVaw2DRpFz3_uAE3N6fZjysxpg

The next link has a lot of detail,and is the strategy doc put together reviewing facility needs in South East Melbourne. Is covers the growth of the game, capping of field use by councils due to attempts to minimise overuse, and inadequate facilities for women. It's proposing a multi layered strategy to increase ground availability from tens on millions spent on improvements in ground irrigation, lighting, and female change rooms, to new ovals and synthetic grounds

]
 
Last edited:

Professor Knowall

Club Legend
Sep 24, 2006
2,635
1,283
Wimmera
AFL Club
Collingwood

Johnny Bananas

Club Legend
Sep 10, 2010
2,452
2,898
A sugar refinery
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
This regarding the shortage of soccer pitches is resulting in clubs turning away players, with the FFV estimating an extra 260-420 pitches in Victoria by 2026


[/URL]

The next link has a lot of detail,and is the strategy doc put together reviewing facility needs in South East Melbourne. Is covers the growth of the game, capping of field use by councils due to attempts to minimise overuse, and inadequate facilities for women. It's proposing a multi layered strategy to increase ground availability from tens on millions spent on improvements in ground irrigation, lighting, and female change rooms, to new ovals and synthetic grounds

[/URL]
Those links are broken, can you please resend?
 

Professor Knowall

Club Legend
Sep 24, 2006
2,635
1,283
Wimmera
AFL Club
Collingwood
Read up on the backlash about a lacrosse team being moved from Dorothy Laver Reserve so it can be a closed synthetic turf grounds exclusive for soccer. Or the fight in Footscray over Melbourne Victory wanting to take over one of their parks for a training facility.

Parkland is finite in Melbourne, and rate payers are loathe to hand it over for free to for profit sports groups. This is because these groups want exclusive control of the ground, it and kicks out all the local footy and cricket clubs. ...
The fight between local residents and the Maribyrnong council over the grant of public parkland to the (privately owned) Melbourne Victory (which, contrary to the attached article, is actually currently used for rugby and even more so for scratch cricket games throughout the year - yes, even in Winter) is still on-going -
 

Ned_Flanders

Premium Platinum
Aug 22, 2009
47,172
87,943
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
76'ers
Elsternwick Park has been floated which could be a good option. VAFA finals could remain. Not sure who (if anybody) plays there during home and away.
According to wiki it's the admin and main playing base for the vafa. Sharing isn't impossible in that scenario. There is a soccer club that also plays there, so they may need to be relocated.

Council is working on an upgrade, so timing is good if they can convince council to switch plans. Negative is there is a park association, so you have to put up with their complaints.

Personally I'd push for Parkville, and use it as an opportunity to create an alliance with Melbourne uni
 

telsor

Hall of Famer
Aug 29, 2004
30,769
27,849
Here
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Habs
Didn't mean you "train" there all the time. You do use it (as do the Dees and storm), so depriving you guys of access to an existing resource is a negative the demons would need to counter.

And your points obvious about your arrangement, and completely irrelevant to the demons because they are not talking about giving up Casey. As such, it's why I've said the public access issue is a loser for them, because they are wanting something for free effectively
No, we don't train at goschs at all. We have management access of Olympic Park

My point is precisely relevant whether or not you grasped it's relevance
Lots of teams called Melbourne train on Gosch's....Demons, Storm, Victory, City & Rebels.

Collingwood has a lease on Holden centre & the adjacent ground (which, like Gosch's is a public park so their lease is akin to any sports ground across Melbourne...when not in use, the public can go there, and so long as they don't significantly affect the amenity of the leasee, can do as they will), but still use some resources from their landlord (Melbourne and Olympic Parks trust...the same people who run Gosch's).
 

Top Bottom