rick James said:
It's fair until you look deeper into it. It's not as if all of those players were starting injured - that was the point. If you coudl read more than one line you'd have understood that.
I was trying to use an out of context quote and you caught me out.
Back to the actual issue, so what you're trying to tell us is that team hardness = the ammount of injuries you can cause for the opposition. Is that what Daniher is using at training? How to cause injuries for the opposition 1on1. If you watched the interview with Daniher after the elimination final he came across, to me, as an incoherent fool, incapable of creating a game plan of his own and so I can see why he would rely on injuries.
Melbourne as a team are hard and yet you only offer up two, maybe three players as evidence of this fact.
Kosi is a walking accident.
Harvey is too old for finals football.
Gehrig's own strength and pride is probably the only reason he got injured, he was intent on standing in that tackle, I dunno why he was trying to run around Carrol in the first place.
One Clarke was backing into a contest and got smashed, I didn't see the other one.
I don't see Melbourne being tough because they caused injuries.