Could you be more patronising if you tried?i wrote an indisputable fact that Dank was never found guilty by an Anti Doping Tribunal of giving any athletes TB4. Now of course he was found guilty of giving athletes other banned substances and was accordingly punished.
What opinion you or me or Joe Public or Mary Public have on a subject is an opinion and not of great importance in the wider world.
Let's hope you can differentiate between fact and opinion.
Sent from my SM-G9250 using Tapatalk
What matters is that the retrial you seem to desperately want won't happen unless the court of public opinion insists it does. That's regardless of how important you judge that opinion to be.
That's also a fact as unpalatable as it may be to you.
When you reply as we all know you will, lets hope you can differentiate between a forum and a courtroom. The way you usually communicate makes it appear you can't. And yes, I am being patronising too.