You are joking right, yes Nannes was unlucky, but in the One day comp this year. Nannes has taken 10 wickets at 30 with a strike rate of 35 where as Lee has taken 15 at 25 with a strike rate of 30. If anything Nannes should have been picked in front of Pattinson who has only taken 6 wickets. The selectors clearly considered lee and pattinson candidates for world cup and nannes not
I must be joking? Am I the one quoting one-day figures when talking about someone's suitability for the 20/20 matches, where Nannes specializes? Or talking about the world cup (a one day tournament) when discussing the 20/20 side?
I see you've conveniently overlooked the start of the T20 Big Bash season, where Lee got
none-for (despite his team bowling out SA cheaply), while Nannes got
3 for 30. But lets not let the facts get in the way of your good story.
And do you honestly expect us to believe that, had Lee been the one in the national T20 side for the past 12 months (and done well, like Nannes did) and Nannes had those figures you quoted in the domestic one-dayers, that they'd just dump Lee with no explanation and bring in Nannes? There would be more chance of pigs flying. Which is my point. The selection process is a corrupt joke.