- Moderator
- #8,501
He may have given me the ass, but no icon of the game & a legend coach should be mistreated like that. Sad to see Mick go out like that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He may have given me the ass, but no icon of the game & a legend coach should be mistreated like that. Sad to see Mick go out like that.
Case in point, my girlfriend. She NEVER watches football, ever. She watched one game with me this season, and the first question she asked was 'Why do your players keep kicking the ball to the same place over and over?'
Murphy and Gibbs apparently told the club that they weren't going to leave!I bet Murph and Gibbs are feeling safe now they have been reassured by the club that they're still wanted...
I'm thinking Jade Rawlings @ Richmond. Coached the season out after Terry Wallet was sacked. Richmond then went through the "due diligence" process & chose Hardwick.No more around the boundary line. Barker let em play attacking style free up a bit
Yep, maybe, yep, maybe, yep
Bugger it, no point keeping a lid on it. Happy days are here again. The skies above are clear again :
Hah! Mine did the exact same thing!
What is her availability for coach next year?
Only we could take the medias attention away from Essendon*. Priorities vultures geeze
We're gonna be bottom 4 cellar dwellers fot the next 3 years at least, I fail to see how 'happy days are here again' ...
IMHO, because on-field the club has steadily gone backwards. Other opinions may differ, I'm not saying he should or should not have been sacked but clearly the players are playing with a lack of passion, intensity & enthusiasm that I've not seen for many many years.I hope you don't mind my imput, but I really don't understand why both carton fans and external commentators and fans think malthouse should have been sacked.
He is clearly a good coach, when he has built a list from the bottom he has proven over thirty year that he is just about the best, at least in the top group. Regardless of who is coaching over the next few years, malthouse or someone else, the list would be rebuilt extensively and most of the players currently there won't be there in a few years no matter who is coaching. So do people really think that there is someone better out there to build a list from the bottom and take them up? It seems to me that the basis of malthouse being sacked is on recent results, and that should be almost irrelevant because it won't alter when your next premiership is going to be, if anything these performances might be a good thing rather than performing like a 9-14th team and carrying a sense of false hope and therefore delaying a rebuild.
But this is a guy who is proven over so many years, surely that says more about the players than the coach. Just about a complete group of new players will be in there in a few years, so why get rid of the coach because the players "aren't playing for him" when most of these players aren't going to be there anyway....IMHO, because on-field the club has steadily gone backwards. Other opinions may differ, I'm not saying he should or should not have been sacked but clearly the players are playing with a lack of passion, intensity & enthusiasm that I've not seen for many many years.
Can we get Cachia back now?
Radio interview was revealing. The sub-text was that he knew he was gone after two weeks, wanted to bring things to a head while dropping some bombshells, but for me the telling thing was that he didn't take ownership of the state of the current list. He was asked if this list was his as opposed to one he'd inherited and he deflected. We've been talking about the list turnover of the last couple of years and the coach's optimism in the pre-season, but basically he resorted to blaming injuries and essentally took no responsibility.Deja vu
Must have been a hell of a radio interview this morning, will have to listen to it
I'm feeling a bit hollow and Jon Barker? Ugh
I hope you don't mind my imput, but I really don't understand why both carton fans and external commentators and fans think malthouse should have been sacked.
He is clearly a good coach, when he has built a list from the bottom he has proven over thirty year that he is just about the best, at least in the top group. Regardless of who is coaching over the next few years, malthouse or someone else, the list would be rebuilt extensively and most of the players currently there won't be there in a few years no matter who is coaching. So do people really think that there is someone better out there to build a list from the bottom and take them up? It seems to me that the basis of malthouse being sacked is on recent results, and that should be almost irrelevant because it won't alter when your next premiership is going to be, if anything these performances might be a good thing rather than performing like a 9-14th team and carrying a sense of false hope and therefore delaying a rebuild.