
- Aug 20, 2017
- 1,810
- 2,274
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Right hereIs there a list somewhere of whether our boys nominated for 6 months or 18?
2 of ours opted for the 6 months unsure about Ramm.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Gold Coast v Collingwood - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Pies at 53% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
Supercoach Rd 18 Rd18 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC - BigFooty Cup – Round 2 - Last Coach Standing ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 18 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Bye Round Summary ,//, AFLW Fantasy 2025!
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Right hereIs there a list somewhere of whether our boys nominated for 6 months or 18?
No they wontWell... the magpies will be stronger ...
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Needs more sackinkley for mine.so round 10 minutes post mid season draft hows my negative predictions tracking?
So far
- Mackinlay already pigeonholed as mcentee 2.0
- Liddy T**ty already described as a limited player where everyone wanted watkins even though around 17 hours ago Watkins was described as a ball burner
- Lol get over yourselves even if we picked Watkins everyone would be raging about a midget 176cm mid.
Cmon guys we need some more Ramm negativity to round out the jackpot.
These 3 combined with Lai, surely one or two will go alright
I think Port has in mind to draft Watkins as a rookie.Davies hinted that Watkins was going to be overlooked by saying yesterday "that if he misses out in the mid-Season draft he was a good chance for the National Draft or Rookie Draft". Watkins, according the Advertiser, wanted 18 months too. As a rookie draft selection he would only have a 12 month contract. Taking Liddy and McKinlay gives a chance to really assess these guys. We already know Watkins well. I hope Watkins gets on our AFL list eventually. He's clearly our best player in the SANFL.
I think its more given we HAVE listed a potato might as well be one our best player gives AF aboutSo we should list potatoes to make Butters happy?
Watkins has been under Norfs nose & now ours I think it probably tells you he is zero chance of cracking an AFL midfield. Butters isn't staying or going based on what a mate is doing period.I think its more given we HAVE listed a potato might as well be one our best player gives AF about
They may have made him a promise to do it then so that they can add more depth this year to help in the Magpies.I think Port has in mind to draft Watkins as a rookie.
Brynn Teakle was from the WAFL, Narkle from the VFL.Why dont we ever look outside SANFL for MSD? Do our scouts not have the money to travel or something?
Teakle was very much needs based and at the time there werent many options in MSD to get a ruck so by virtue it had to be him. His performances since would suggest that maybe we didnt fully scout him either.Brynn Teakle was from the WAFL, Narkle from the VFL.
People have to calm the farm. All this hysteria because Port didn’t draft Watkins = Butters leaving.Butters isn't staying or going based on what a mate is doing period.
Carn' you were wrong just admit it lolTeakle was very much needs based and at the time there werent many options in MSD to get a ruck so by virtue it had to be him. His performances since would suggest that maybe we didnt fully scout him either.
Narkle, there was enough exposed AFL form to make a call, he barely spent that much time in VFL after being delisted.
Ramm doesn't make our SANFL team better short term.Three players added for SANFL depth.