catempire
Hall of Famer
Here's my midfield tip: you'll see basically no change from the 2016 finals choice midfield (personnel) but significantly better output in 2017.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Hand Blitz over to Scarlo for the summer and turn him into a defender, our backline is getting too old.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I would prefer to see Blicavs playing 2nd ruck and doing the other stuff from that position like 2015. He matched well with Stanley then. The answer would seem to be playing Stanley forward with only occasional pinch-hits in the ruck, this would hopefully help out Hawkins if Stanley is good enough. It also depends on how well Smith can play as first ruck, he was good in the early part of the season but inconsistent.Obviously J. Selwood & Dangerfield are locks. But there are lots of players who can play midfield or go through the midfield at times.
What are people's thoughts on how our midfield will look in 2017, assuming all of them have full pre-seasons?
In terms of individuals I'm thinking:...
Blicavs - ??? I only want one of Smith/Stanley doing the main rucking (my preference is Stanley) with Blitz 2nd ruck, but are people's thoughts on Blitz' role next year ???
This Duncan crap is stupid, let me run through his position in the team for everyone to get a better idea.
3rd in team for disposals
5th for score involvements
2nd for goal assists
8th for contested possessions
3rd for marks
3rd for tackles
7th for clearances
4th for inside 50s
9th for rebound 50s
3rd for frees for
All this in a supposed bad year, but hay whatever lets just trade away a player about to enter his prime because reasons.
The strength of the GWS, Doggies, and Sydney's midfield though is that they're nearly all inside and outside mids - we just don't have that, Caddy, and Blitz lack explosive outside speed, so do S. Selwood and J.Selwood. The only mids we have comparable to the majority of those teams mids (being tough inside but damaging with speed on the outside) is Danger and Guthrie (whenever he's actually in there).We have some weapons in the middle, i think a change/improvement in set up and structures will help dramatically.
The contested bulls don't need to kick the ball all the time.. the swans/dogs love the contest.. they both get the ball out quick by hands to a receiver.
If we are able to start using our inside bulls getting the ball out more our Guths amd Duncs who are good by foot will be more effective IMO. We seem to have mids who just try to charge through and bang in long by foot... danger has the explosive power to do it.. others shouldn't
The two in bold aren't good enough, if you're a mid getting as much time in the guts as Duncan you have to be significantly higher in those particular stats - they were two areas we were destroyed in early against the Swans.This Duncan crap is stupid, let me run through his position in the team for everyone to get a better idea.
3rd in team for disposals
5th for score involvements
2nd for goal assists
8th for contested possessions
3rd for marks
3rd for tackles
7th for clearances
4th for inside 50s
9th for rebound 50s
3rd for frees for
All this in a supposed bad year, but hay whatever lets just trade away a player about to enter his prime because reasons.
But he's not an inside mid, and he doesn't spend much time in the guts.The two in bold aren't good enough, if you're a mid getting as much time in the guts as Duncan you have to be significantly higher in those particular stats - they were two areas we were destroyed in early against the Swans.
We have given enough years for Duncan so think he should go. Caddy is required as he's a bull and crash around the packs. Unsure about Blitz. He can run all day but no real pace. He can ruck but only as a secondary. He needs to become a permanent back in my mind.
The two in bold aren't good enough, if you're a mid getting as much time in the guts as Duncan you have to be significantly higher in those particular stats - they were two areas we were destroyed in early against the Swans.
Lana Duncan's centre bounce attendance % please.But he's not an inside mid, and he doesn't spend much time in the guts.
Not every player needs to play in and under contested ball he's not built for it.
Selwood, Danger, SSelwood, Menegola, Caddy, Guthrie they can go in and get it and feed to Duncan on the outside, a good team needs both types of players.
Same people would have been calling for Bartel to be traded in 2005This Duncan crap is stupid, let me run through his position in the team for everyone to get a better idea.
3rd in team for disposals
5th for score involvements
2nd for goal assists
8th for contested possessions
3rd for marks
3rd for tackles
7th for clearances
4th for inside 50s
9th for rebound 50s
3rd for frees for
All this in a supposed bad year, but hay whatever lets just trade away a player about to enter his prime because reasons.
21% from rounds 1 to 23. 8th highest in the club (ruckmen excluded)Lana Duncan's centre bounce attendance % please.
The two in bold aren't good enough, if you're a mid getting as much time in the guts as Duncan you have to be significantly higher in those particular stats - they were two areas we were destroyed in early against the Swans.
) get the ball out to him & Guthrie/Lang to use it well inside 50.I understand that but he's not exceptionally quick on the outside and so needs to get better numbers specifically in clearances if we're to improve as a team.Selwood, Danger, SSelwood, Menegola, Caddy, Guthrie they can go in and get it and feed to Duncan on the outside, a good team needs both types of players.
Same people would have been calling for Bartel to be traded in 2005
Stop the presses: 8th most used midfielder in centre square ranks 8th for cont poss and 7th for clearances.21% from rounds 1 to 23. 8th highest in the club (ruckmen excluded)
I was so surprised at the result I had to double check it. Now I'm almost certain that the AFL stats are incorrectStop the presses: 8th most used midfielder in centre square ranks 8th for cont poss and 7th for clearances.
BREAKING
Supports my theory that criticisms of 2nd tier, whilst warranted to some extent, are overblown and their performances reflected the diminished significance of their role/importance to the team.I was so surprised at the result I had to double check it. Now I'm almost certain that the AFL stats are incorrect
Supports my theory that criticisms of 2nd tier, whilst warranted to some extent, are overblown and their performances reflected the diminished significance of their role/importance to the team.
Need a team/tactical lift in 2017 more than anything.
Um there are stoppages around the ground too, sorry to break that to you.Stop the presses: 8th most used midfielder in centre square ranks 8th for cont poss and 7th for clearances.
BREAKING
I think for some players that is true.Supports my theory that criticisms of 2nd tier, whilst warranted to some extent, are overblown and their performances reflected the diminished significance of their role/importance to the team.
Need a team/tactical lift in 2017 more than anything.
No idea at this stage. All the mids besides danger and Joel were awful this year. So **** knows.

