Remove this Banner Ad

Mitch Clark - The SQL

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cheers :thumbsu:

Being a long term Fitzroy supporter, I have a hatred for most Victorian clubs. I love it when you guys or any other interstate teams for that matter, destroy clubs like Carlton, Collingwood etc on your home turf.

For the first time, in a few days, I actually feel relaxed. I chucked away the angry pills. The "good fight" has been fought by both clubs. They can't keep butting heads.

All the best to you guys, regardless of who gets what picks/players on Monday.


Ta. I didn't notice you were Melbourne-based. Phew, glad you hate them as well. Could of got ugly:p
 
Was thinking - Loyal Lyon would be an awesome nick :p Lots to work with there

Haha that's a good play on words.

I can tell you that Rossy Lyon was indeed a fearsome competitor. He used to run in from the centre square when the ball was bounced & run through the first opposition player in his way.

For such a laconic, laid back bloke, he was a terror on the field. Any Fitzroy supporter will tell you that.

I have a long memory too. I'll never forget that Freo gave Fitzroy an unofficial farewell, when the league & Vic clubs gave us SWA!
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Haha that's a good play on words.

I can tell you that Rossy Lyon was indeed a fearsome competitor. He used to run in from the centre square when the ball was bounced & run through the first opposition player in his way.

For such a laconic, laid back bloke, he was a terror on the field. Any Fitzroy supporter will tell you that.

I have a long memory too. I'll never forget that Freo gave Fitzroy an unofficial farewell, when the league & Vic clubs gave us SWA!


I was at that game. It was quite emotional.
 
The wedge politics comment was about you taking the extreme point of any debate and then trying to make yourself look like the bastion of truth.



Even though the vast majority of posters who want Clark favour using only 1 of the 2 first rounders (or less) .....you by very selective comment paint everyone who does not agree with you as wanting to pay 16 or 20.

It is wedge politics find an extreme view and use it to divide.



Again yep I said 80 or 90 (what a shock you take the upper limit of the post).

You say 90, you live by 90. Accusing me of taking the extreme when you said it is just weasel words. Pav's best season is 70 odd (in 2006-07) and Clark's best season is less than 30 (in 2009). Clark should get better, but we'd be struggling to see Pavlich do better than 60 goals per season over 30 years of age. In 2012, expecting '80-90' goals is madness. I hope they get them too. I doubt they will, though.

If you want to be delusional, go ahead. I mean, you coached 'bigs'. Good on you, well done. I heard the same about Tarrant. We lost most of our games that year. Most of the time Tarrant was with us, we lost. And in Tarrant, we had an actual All Australian forward with us.

I'm not so silly to share in your delusion, as nice as it may be.
 
I was at that game. It was quite emotional.

Certainly was. Our second last game. I think that Ron Alexander (ex Fitzroy captain & ruckman) had a fair bit to do with the farewell. Not sure if he was linked to Freo at the time.

You're going to have a very big side next year if you keep Griffin. Over time on the Lion's board, a lot of us thought that Mitch Clark would make a good Centre Half Back.

Personally I reckon that his best position is in the ruck. He plays like an old Ruck-Rover type. He is a very good link up man. Although no doubt you've recruited him as a Centre Half Forward.
 
Certainly was. Our second last game. I think that Ron Alexander (ex Fitzroy captain & ruckman) had a fair bit to do with the farewell. Not sure if he was linked to Freo at the time.

You're going to have a very big side next year if you keep Griffin. Over time on the Lion's board, a lot of us thought that Mitch Clark would make a good Centre Half Back.

Personally I reckon that his best position is in the ruck. He plays like an old Ruck-Rover type. He is a very good link up man. Although no doubt you've recruited him as a Centre Half Forward.


Yeah a lot of people thought if Clark came in Griffen would probably go out, but Lyon wanted to keep him. He must have something in mind. I think they are a little concerned if Sandilands goes down next season that Zac Clarke would have to be our number 1 ruck (not sure if he is ready for that) or we will have to play Clark in the ruck. Which kind of defeats the purpose. I hope Griff gets some game because he was Port's preferred ruck option and he would have played as there number 1 ruckman.
Does seem that Clark does play his best footy in the ruck but a forward line with Pav and Clark would be hard to counter if we have smalls at their feet.
 
I will not believe the Clark deal is done until I see it as a confirmed deal on AFL.com

Why would we even give anything when it is quite clear we can get him in the pre season draft for nothing??

Because it is far from clear we would.
 
I will not believe the Clark deal is done until I see it as a confirmed deal on AFL.com



Because it is far from clear we would.


I don't get this certainty that we will get Clark in the PSD. The compo pick from GWS is a big danger from what I can gather. It's just bravado, its not based on anything rational. He might slip through but I wouldn't put my house on it.
 
I am glad Freo and Lions supporters are getting along now, but if Loyal Lion and Apuchar start sharing a piece of spaghetti and meet in the middle for a kiss, I'm out of here...
 
I don't get this certainty that we will get Clark in the PSD. The compo pick from GWS is a big danger from what I can gather. It's just bravado, its not based on anything rational. He might slip through but I wouldn't put my house on it.

i would. Clubs don't pick up players that don't want to be with them. it's asking for trouble.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I am glad Freo and Lions supporters are getting along now, but if Loyal Lion and Apuchar start sharing a piece of spaghetti and meet in the middle for a kiss, I'm out of here...



If I find out Brisbane have sent Clark to the PSD, I'll be back to my old nasty self very quickly.
Don't worry, I have Italian heritage I would never share my spaghetti.
 
i would. Clubs don't pick up players that don't want to be with them. it's asking for trouble.


You are probably right, but you could never be certain. You're just taking a calculated risk, that's all. Some of the people make it sound as though they definitely know the outcome. That's rubbish.
 
I would be about 90% certain we would get him in pre season draft.
After his latest statement it is extremely unlikely any other club would bother.

Reason we wont go the psd option is not because they dont want to risk it, its because Clark has done everything possible within rules to make it easier for us to get him.
But also said he would like to make sure Bris get something in return.
So to make sure bris get something in return we will not go the psd option an also because its not a good way to go about grabbing quality players an if we snagged him for nothing there would be alot of upset clubs that will be looking to do the same with some of our young talent.
 
You say 90, you live by 90. Accusing me of taking the extreme when you said it is just weasel words.

So we are going to have a debate if I said 80/90, or if I said 90 ....wow if only there was some quote feature that would solve this for us.

For 1 pick - yep I think he is.

I see the makings of a dominant forward - 80/90 goals from Pav/Clark makes us a top 4 team.

Remember when I said you always highlight the part of the debate you think best suits whatever rant you are making.

Exhibit A your honour.

Normally I wouldn't give a stuff but you take exaggeration and selective quoting to a new level....so there you go Clay make up some more shyte.

Pav's best season is 70 odd (in 2006-07) and Clark's best season is less than 30 (in 2009). Clark should get better, but we'd be struggling to see Pavlich do better than 60 goals per season over 30 years of age. In 2012, expecting '80-90' goals is madness. I hope they get them too. I doubt they will, though.

So you are predicting Pav will kick about 60, and Clark should improve on his 27 ....so you are expecting what around 87 goals from them if they play.

Mmmmm my legal team are examining your post to see if they can find a hole in your criticism of me saying 80/90 ....probably wont turn anything up but we can hope.

You do this well, they fail - you pull up the criticism of 80/90, they do it and you pull up your post saying I said they would kick em.

Would be almost amusing if it wasn't so annoying - make a call FFS.

If you want to be delusional, go ahead. I mean, you coached 'bigs'. Good on you, well done. I heard the same about Tarrant. We lost most of our games that year. Most of the time Tarrant was with us, we lost. And in Tarrant, we had an actual All Australian forward with us.

I'm not so silly to share in your delusion, as nice as it may be.

Bigs mature later. As a CHF - you would expect Clark's time to be now + forward.

Plus again ...bring up Tarrant, how about you debate me in a post directly about me.

What were my thoughts on the Taz trade ...

When Farmer retires, Tarrant is over the hill and our Pick 13 is killing it for the Pies ....then what. Our premiership window has not even opened - we got to 3rd, dont trade the future - build on what we have.

Polly out - Tuck in and use the 13 pick.

If Tarrant wants in (and this is doubtful) - they can take a flying leap as they will want 13 and a player ....too much no thanks.

Also Tuck is all right, no superstar but a hard worker and Bell could do with a hand in there. If they cant be 190 cm fleet of foot ....let them find the pill on a regular basis - Tuck would do if Polly wants out.

.......I think the same as you?

If your looking for your arse, I think it is over near the door where I kicked it.
 
I would be about 90% certain we would get him in pre season draft.
After his latest statement it is extremely unlikely any other club would bother.

Reason we wont go the psd option is not because they dont want to risk it, its because Clark has done everything possible within rules to make it easier for us to get him.
But also said he would like to make sure Bris get something in return.
So to make sure bris get something in return we will not go the psd option an also because its not a good way to go about grabbing quality players an if we snagged him for nothing there would be alot of upset clubs that will be looking to do the same with some of our young talent.


90 % certain. not hard to see how gamblers get in the shit, is it? TacoPavlich is going to put his house on something that if the 10 % came in would most likely ruin life (unless he is Packer or someone).
Channel 7 just said that the deal is not through and that Brisbane want more than pick 16. As Moo said it aint over until it's official
 
90 % certain. not hard to see how gamblers get in the shit, is it? TacoPavlich is going to put his house on something that if the 10 % came in would most likely ruin life (unless he is Packer or someone).
Channel 7 just said that the deal is not through and that Brisbane want more than pick 16. As Moo said it aint over until it's official

I'd say it's more than 90% percent imo. Not that i think he will go to PSD anyway. Freo will probably throw down pick 16, pick 20 if we are cheeky and they should take it.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Previous years I'd agree but wont GWS still have picks to burn in the PSD? Clark would be a handy player for them as long as he could get over how he was picked and got on with playing football. I doubt if Melbourne or another established team would go against recent form and GWS probably wouldn't but it's still a gamble imo.
 
I'd say it's more than 90% percent imo. Not that i think he will go to PSD anyway. Freo will probably throw down pick 16, pick 20 if we are cheeky and they should take it.


I'm staying away from these boards for a month if we give 16 and 20. God this forum will go into meltdown.
 
i would. Clubs don't pick up players that don't want to be with them. it's asking for trouble.

Can you support that with an example where that has been the case? And I mean a player with significant value, not McPhee/Anthony "meh" types.

The last time something like that happened was Nick Stevens, and to an extent Jade Rawlings, both of which contradict your argument
 
So we are going to have a debate if I said 80/90, or if I said 90 ....wow if only there was some quote feature that would solve this for us.



Remember when I said you always highlight the part of the debate you think best suits whatever rant you are making.

Exhibit A your honour.

Normally I wouldn't give a stuff but you take exaggeration and selective quoting to a new level....so there you go Clay make up some more shyte.



So you are predicting Pav will kick about 60, and Clark should improve on his 27 ....so you are expecting what around 87 goals from them if they play.

Mmmmm my legal team are examining your post to see if they can find a hole in your criticism of me saying 80/90 ....probably wont turn anything up but we can hope.

You do this well, they fail - you pull up the criticism of 80/90, they do it and you pull up your post saying I said they would kick em.

Would be almost amusing if it wasn't so annoying - make a call FFS.



Bigs mature later. As a CHF - you would expect Clark's time to be now + forward.

Plus again ...bring up Tarrant, how about you debate me in a post directly about me.

What were my thoughts on the Taz trade ...



.......I think the same as you?

If your looking for your arse, I think it is over near the door where I kicked it.

This is a Moo version of caps rage.

Congrats on getting the most docile and relaxed bloke on our boards fired up. :thumbsdown:

Heads says Clay goes into hiding for a few days, Tails says he launches into a tirade of personal attacks.

Place your bets.
 
I ment 16 OR 20.


They have already offered 16 apparently and Brisbane has said it is not enough. There was talk that we may need to add a player or go to mediation.
I am hoping that Brisbane are holding off on accepting 16 from us so Hawthorn won't get any ideas about asking for that pick in negotiation for Lisle. Don't know what Lisle is worth, so it may have nothing to do with it. Wishful thinking on my part I guess.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top