Mitchell Vs Bartel

[burto]

Both similar, tough inside Midfielders. Who would you rather at your club?

 

[Kerrby]

Jimmy Bartel easily.

 

[Philhawk]

Nice comparison, but i'd have to go with Mitch who is better with clearances and the added leadership value he brings to the team.

 

[bellzy]

Nice comparison, but i'd have to go with Mitch who is better with clearances and the added leadership value he brings to the team.

I wonder why...

Jimmy by the length of the nile...Mainly becuase he is versatile and DOES something with the ball....

 

[the missing head]

on current form you would say Jimmy

 

[H2F]

No one ever rates Mitchell. Funny though because all the coaches would take him in their first 5 picks and Bartel maybe (on this years form) in their first 50.

Joke continues about Mitchell and how under-rated he is.

 

[JKCeagle]

No one ever rates Mitchell. Funny though because all the coaches would take him in their first 5 picks and Bartel maybe (on this years form) in their first 50.

Joke continues about Mitchell and how under-rated he is.

Mate, if you are talking this year's form Bartel would be about second player picked.

Right now, Bartel for me.

 

[melbournemartin]

Bartel has a few more strings to his bow imo but I'd still love to have Mitchell.

 

[BedlamHawk]

I wonder why...

Jimmy by the length of the nile...Mainly becuase he is versatile and DOES something with the ball....

Looks like you haven't watched Mitchell play moron. He is alot more versatile than people think. His kicking efficiency and footspeed have improved dramatically.

 

[Merv]

One of the few polls that pit 2 even players agaisnt each other.

Very tough call imo, and i would go Bartel by a bees d**k

 

[Rockford]

No one ever rates Mitchell. Funny though because all the coaches would take him in their first 5 picks and Bartel maybe (on this years form) in their first 50.

Joke continues about Mitchell and how under-rated he is.

I'd take Bartel on this season's form.

Amazing that you know what all the coaches think. If you can read minds did you avoid the Hawks game against St Kilda because you knew it would be crap?

 

[MarkJohnson#1]

Bartel, although both are guns.

 

[ripitup27]

Bartel. More contested possessions than Mitchell.

 

[augie]

Both quality players but Bartel a bit better by virtue of his greater versatility and the fact that he is a very good mark.

 

[bellzy]

Looks like you haven't watched Mitchell play moron. He is alot more versatile than people think. His kicking efficiency and footspeed have improved dramatically.

Touch a nerve did I?

Is it because if Mitchell is crap, then Hawthorn is crap? Or is it because there couldn't POSSIBLY be a better player than Mitchell? FFS, get over yourself.

 

[Upgrayedd]

Current form says Bartel, Over the years Mitchell has been a top player longer then Bartel though