Physics multi / parallel / simulation universe, time travel, holofractals, computer code in string theory,
- Thread starter cannot
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
- May 17, 2015
- 4,951
- 5,405
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Wouldn't say I'm well versed,but I'm into it,so I guess I'm slightly versed. The trippy part about simulation theory for me appears to be that a lot of the laws of quantum physics that people still don't totally get fit into this model very well.
Hopefully some well versed people post some stuff,it's pretty cool and interesting
Last edited:
- May 17, 2015
- 4,951
- 5,405
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
With simulation theory growing in popularity especially considering Elon Musks comment and the fact he is spending billions of dollars on further research,I wonder if this has anything to do with the apparent hoax regarding gravitational waves from the LIGO.
After Lawrence Krauss went to Twitter to announce the findings,it now appears the discovery was just management injecting signals into the data to see if the research team could identify them.
So why was the data made public? Certainly questions need to be asked as to whether or not this was some kind of PR exercise. An exercise perhaps to take attention away from Sims theory and back to more traditional scientific ones?
Interesting.
After Lawrence Krauss went to Twitter to announce the findings,it now appears the discovery was just management injecting signals into the data to see if the research team could identify them.
So why was the data made public? Certainly questions need to be asked as to whether or not this was some kind of PR exercise. An exercise perhaps to take attention away from Sims theory and back to more traditional scientific ones?
Interesting.
- May 17, 2015
- 4,951
- 5,405
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Ok will do
This is not science, this is conspiracy science. What "theory" do you propose for simulation of the universe? its a hypothesis.
cannot
Norm Smith Medallist
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #9
haha. do you know how the theory gravity operates? can you measure if? sounds like a conspiracy ....
do you know wormholes are legit?
did you know newton and albert just made up some new maths (deadset
) to make the theory work? conspiracy science / conspiracy mathswho is the gate keeper that control what is real science and what is not? no doubt some mod that works at clink that doesnt allow old ladies to use the bathroom and failed yr 10.
not many of you are experts at computer codes in string theory or quantum in general and those that are i doubt use the term conspiracy science much, cause it could backfire and you look like a knob
We know gravity exists. We do not understand gravity yes. But Do we know multiple/parallel/simulation exists or not? If yes please state your theory with observable and verifiable evidences, thanks.haha. do you know how the theory gravity operates? can you measure if? sounds like a conspiracy ....
did you know newton and albert just made up some new maths (deadset
who is the gate keeper that control what is real science and what is not? no doubt some mod that works at clink that doesnt allow old ladies to use the bathroom and failed yr 10
So no observable and verifiable evidences then? you realise that parraell universe is a hypothesis, gravity is not? you should envy me, afterall you argue for a flat earth.
cannot
Norm Smith Medallist
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #13
on thursdays i argue at my local KKK branch - but its not really relevant to this thread, is it?
i think you will find there is a lot of evidence. You are making big claims when i get the feeling your knowledge level in regards to OP is low
its a complicated topic, you may not get replies within 7 seconds of every question you ask
This is all i am asking you. To provide scientific evidence, which is observable and verifiable. You getting your panties in a knot for this?
You mean this guy?
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Nassim_Haramein
He is no scientist, he has made several "claims" and unable to back it up. His bio on his website states As early as 9 years old, Nassim was already discovering the universal dynamics of matter and energy. this is the sort of silly statement youd find for a cult leader, not a scientist. Nobody is making meaningful discoveries about dynamics at 9 years of age… they are just precocious and interested. Which is great, when you are 9. But it doesn’t mean anything… unless you have some mystical view of science where some people are ‘special’. The site does. That makes me pretty dubious.
And next is "unifying all physics" theory, sorry, thats bullshit. Science is not going admit unification of all things like that. Like Einstein once said , a theory that explains everything actually explains nothing.
I cannot refute the claims of Nassim Harramein because... his claims are a matter for philosophers of science, not physicists.
Try again.
Quoting a pseudo scientist in a science forum is what you do, which is why i suggested take your s**t to the conspiracy board. Thanks
cannot
Norm Smith Medallist
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #18
cult leader like Neil deGrasse Tyson, Einstein, Sagan?
perhaps he is popular because he has potentially unified the field?
is string theory pseudo scientist or real?
i suggest you re-read your degrees and think if you are qualified for making such claims
He is unable to back his statements up. He is making "claims" which are nothing more than "claims". The fact that you are in a science forum and comparing scientists with cult leaders is actually hilarious. Know who are you quoting before quoting someone. If his claims are true, he should do the math and publish, in a peer-reviewed journal, at least one of the ‘earthshattering discoveries’ he generates.If he’s who he says he is, he should be able to advance physics in a way that makes Einstien look like a schoolkid. And if that is true? But that is not going to happen for reasons we both know.
Dont get into name calling for calling you out on quoting bogus scientists and con artists.
Theres little evidence for us to say its proper science, its speculative science, theres some evidence available but not enough to call it "science.
- May 17, 2015
- 4,951
- 5,405
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Anyone with any actual scientific viewpoint about what's going on at LIGO?
I find it concerning and wonder if others consider leaking information from experiments before proper verification is concerning?
Does science need to consider where it stands ethically on social media now that social media plays such a prominent role in modern society?
I find it concerning and wonder if others consider leaking information from experiments before proper verification is concerning?
Does science need to consider where it stands ethically on social media now that social media plays such a prominent role in modern society?
Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 97,444
- 235,990
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Status
