Remove this Banner Ad

NAB Challenge Discussion

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jack Viney:

NAB 1: 12 kicks, 16 handballs (16 contested possessions), 4 tackles, 10 clearances, 123 SC points
NAB 2: 6 kicks, 19 handballs, (14 contested possessions), 6 tackles, 6 clearances, 113 SC points

Will he tag again. If he doesn't, it will be hard to leave him out.
 
Jack Viney:

NAB 1: 12 kicks, 16 handballs (16 contested possessions), 4 tackles, 10 clearances, 123 SC points
NAB 2: 6 kicks, 19 handballs, (14 contested possessions), 6 tackles, 6 clearances, 113 SC points

Will he tag again. If he doesn't, it will be hard to leave him out.
Definitely one I'll be looking at in SuperCoach Draft, but when it comes to classic, that price is just too awkward and will seriously mess with team balance. I wish he was 397 not 497. As someone has previously stated, I'd rather Mitch Duncan at the same price point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Have to make the tough call, BKennedy is not starting in my side.
There's a few in the $170k to $250k in the forwards that could make an ok case for being picked as higher priced rookies/cheap mid-pricers this season and he certainly hasn't been the worst one of them I don't think. He's not the best price though and i'm not sure of his JS.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Definitely one I'll be looking at in SuperCoach Draft, but when it comes to classic, that price is just too awkward and will seriously mess with team balance. I wish he was 397 not 497. As someone has previously stated, I'd rather Mitch Duncan at the same price point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agreed.

Parker is only 40k extra, and there's no chance of a tagging role for him.
 
That's the easiest call you will make this year
Why? Most on the Dees board have BenKen as best 22
I think he's good for a 70 average (which will see him over $300k), it's just a matter of if he's best 22
 
Farrkin ell, 3 bench def, 5 bench mid, 3 bench fwd would make this game more interesting.. I want to have all these rookies haha, would save me about 49 minutes a day on reading.. Thats 16 beers a week extra.. The sacrifices for SC
You want more bench spots for rookies??? I'm struggling to fill my onfield rookies
 
Farrkin ell, 3 bench def, 5 bench mid, 3 bench fwd would make this game more interesting.. I want to have all these rookies haha, would save me about 49 minutes a day on reading.. Thats 16 beers a week extra.. The sacrifices for SC
I like your time per beer ratio 21.44 mins sounds about right for me too as a mean average.
 
Dunkley's numbers look great.
Any room for him in the Doggies midfield? Don't think so...
He played off the front of the centre sqaure as a high half-forward today, not a pure midfield role. There is a spot for that sort of player actually because Crameri is out for 2016.

If Dunkley plays NAB3, then he's probably going to play R1. Coach has said that next week is a full dress rehearsal.
If he doesn't play NAB3, suggest you find another cheap MID option for your SC bench.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Who's more likely to get a gig at the Doggies, Collins or Adams? Adams has looked alright today.
Both are valid options for R1. Roberts was appalling today and his spot (played in EF last year) is up for grabs. My money is on Adams if only one of these guys gets a gig.

Morris won't play 22 games this year though, so there will be times when both Adams and Collins could be in the same 22.
 
He played off the front of the centre sqaure as a high half-forward today, not a pure midfield role. There is a spot for that sort of player actually because Crameri is out for 2016.

If Dunkley plays NAB3, then he's probably going to play R1. Coach has said that next week is a full dress rehearsal.
If he doesn't play NAB3, suggest you find another cheap MID option for your SC bench.
love Dunkley and think he will get games this year. even if he gets named next week will not guarantee him a round one spot (unless he kills it) as there is a extended bench in the NAB. If he gets named round one I'm all over him. but we have good depth and will have to perform to keep his spot.
 
love Dunkley and think he will get games this year. even if he gets named next week will not guarantee him a round one spot (unless he kills it) as there is a extended bench in the NAB. If he gets named round one I'm all over him. but we have good depth and will have to perform to keep his spot.
We didn't use the extended bench option today and I don't expect we will next week either.
 
Agreed.

Parker is only 40k extra, and there's no chance of a tagging role for him.
This. Parker I currently have and was looking at Viney. So I'd be changing them around. But whilst Viney might go 105+ I can see Parker going 110+. Also I would be concerned about Viney tagging. He won't will likely be Bugg or even Vince doing a run with role.
 
Was gonna go to this game for something to do (like 15-20 min drive away) but too hot and got over it. Not much shade at Craigieburn.
I was directly across the road at Highlands Hotel watching the UFC. You could still see play from parts of the ground. The whole area was buzzing today.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

This. Parker I currently have and was looking at Viney. So I'd be changing them around. But whilst Viney might go 105+ I can see Parker going 110+. Also I wouldn't be concerned about Viney tagging. He won't will likely be Bugg or even Vince doing a run with role.
EFA. I actually meant wouldn't worry about Viney tagging. Think he's gone past it with his development. Could run with but won't be tagging.
 
Agree on Parker and Shiel however think Viney a better selection than Wines and Cripps.
3v6wd.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top