bsg7 said:
The only reason he played a game was because he was pretty much the last option, it's not like he earnt his spot throguh good form in the VFL, not that WestCat would know considering he's making all his comments on the two games of football he has seen. Another point i'll make is that Geelong won by 76 points on the w/e so it isnt surprising he played well, the only 2 other games that any of you have said he has played well in were the practise matches earlier in the year when the VFL team won by 100 odd points both times.
Hello again sookie,
Have not heard from you in a while. Did it take you that long to come up with that pathetic reply? Seriously, your arguements need some work.
What difference does it make if he was the last option or the first option in the senior line up? The bottom line is, Nathan played and played well.
Yes, we won the game by 76 points, but we started the game equal, we built the winning lead with the help of Nathan contribution in his brilliant first quarter.
I would also like to point out that Nathan kicked 4.1 and set up 2 other goals. Effectively, he single handedly created 6.1 for the afternoon. Considering West Coast entire score was 5.3. I think Nathan played out his role very successfully.
Nathan has also played well and has been nominated in the best players in his role in the seconds for his defensive efforts at centre half back. I believe someone has previously mentioned this. Do you're research.
Said it once, will say it again. Put both of your heads together and come up with a more valid arguement or drop the subject, admit defeat and stop hoping that young Nathan will fall flat on his face.
Case close. Please don't embarrass yourself anymore.
Conclusion: You're a goose, Nathan may be a superstar.