- Banned
- #126
If Fed is in a decline and is still winning 2 slams a year I'm sure he doesn't give a shit.
The quality of players have been very poor over Federers reign, he can't beat Nadal and Nadal has every chance to over take him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

The Sunday 11th phase of BigFooty's maintenance and upgrade has been completed. Reactions are limited for now. Search is rebuilding. Scheduled Posts are back! Other upgraded features may look/operate slightly different. The styling and colours will change over time.
If Fed is in a decline and is still winning 2 slams a year I'm sure he doesn't give a shit.
The quality of players have been very poor over Federers reign, he can't beat Nadal and Nadal has every chance to over take him.
The quality of players have been very poor over Federers reign
exactly..other than an ailing agassi and injured rafa, no one was there to challenge him.Nole and Muzza lmao give me a break.They are mental short people who cant win shit.Competing with guys like hewitt, roddick, safin, davydenko et all got him majority grand slams whichis surely not like competing with fearless serve and volleyers on faster surfaces.Now we see Del Potro who is well capable of beating him and he is injured even now.So if he doesnt have to face a fit rafa and del-po he might be a few more.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The funny thing is, the reason there's a small minority of mongs (i.e. you two) that call the players Federer has beaten poor is because they simply haven't won enough in their careers. What would these guys have done without Federer around? Won a shitload. Roddick would have as many slams as Nadal right now. Would they be badmouthed then? Not a ****ing chance. Can you see how laughable that is?
Then consider that if you're calling Federer a mediocre player because he hasn't beaten quality, what does that make Nadal? He can't be much higher than mediocre himself using the same idiotic logic.
Your kidding yourself if you think that.Rafa is a poor mans gustavo kuerton.
Gustavo is the greatest clay court player off all time, he beat legends of the game week in week out. Many respected tennis commentators have labelled his forehand the best of all time. He also played with insucntiltits which is a serious condition for average people let alone professional athletes.
World Number 1 is where Rafa belongs!! He was injured around this time last year. Rafa is the real number 1![]()
Federer will get it back by the end of the year.
Rafa did not play from bascially Wimbledon to the US Open so he will accmulate points for not playing in 2009. So he will strectch hes lead over Federer 
Federer will get it back by the end of the year.

Federer has 4200 points to defend till the end of the august, compared to rafas 1,000, even if he wins ,wimbledon, cinci and US open...and rafa makes it through to the semis at wimbledon and semis at US open, its good enough to keep the number 1.Federer has to win a lot of masters series events after the US open and hope nadal loses lol i wouldnt hold my breath if i were ukuerten was a gun but nadal is probably a top 2 clay courter in history at minimum
nadal has lost one match in his life at rolland garros

Yeah, being a fan of Federer has been tough over the years...
As for the number 1 ranking, who really cares? I'd prefer he go into slam hunt mode and pick up a few more of those shiny trophies above![]()
but anyway thats the story of almost every federer fan.However its nice to see you comeback with the same old drivel.Surely quantity is there, lucky that he has been, facing mugs like Nole , muzza, safin, roddick et all...while rafa owned him on his favourite surface.
did you enjoy the F.O btw? i am sure deep in your mind you know roger will never win a slam again by beating a fit rafa 