Naitanui is overated
He was at the start of the year. Then people realised it and over-corrected. Now he's underrated.
But i do expect all essendon supporters to overrate NN. He really does love playing you guys.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Naitanui is overated
If I recall corectly, when West Coast and Carlton played, Kreuzer could only beat Cox in the Hit outs, Nic Nat was all over him, I think Kreuzer had about 5 touches more the Nic Nat also.
I will watch with great interest in 2011, But I think Kreuzer would struggle yet again against Nic Nat in the ruck, and Nic Nat is only going to improve, and once he improves around the ground look out.
I would sacrifice 5 disposals and have nic Nats tap work and upside everyday of the week.


Round 14 Carlton vs West Coast at Etihad:
Naitanui: 8 disposals (38%), 9 tackles, 1 goal, 17 hitouts, mark of the year.
Kreuzer: 11 disposals(64%), 1 tackle, 0 goals, 6 hitouts, no influence on game at all.
I know who I would take![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Kreuzer is overrated. Averaged 1.8 clearances a game last year. Naitanui 4.1
Show the full facts.
As of right now it's Kruz by the lengh, aren't even comparable IMO, Nic Nat has potential but at this stage that's all he has, when he starts getting 20+ touches as well as hitouts and kicking goals i may reconsider, but that's still a fair way off, people forget that Kruz is only going to get better too, he could be a once in a generation player with luck.
I have been observing the polls with eagles players recently and you seem against every single one of them (Hurn, Naitanui, Kennedy) Dude just shut up with your hating bullshit.
See the game on the weekend mate? Kreuzer had no impact at all on the game whereas Naitanui had an impact in putting defensive pressure on and hitouts to advantage which set up scoring opportunities.Nic (mr 5 disposals a game) nat over Kruse? lol
See the game on the weekend mate? Kreuzer had no impact at all on the game whereas Naitanui had an impact in putting defensive pressure on and hitouts to advantage which set up scoring opportunities.
OMG. It was MK's second game in a year after a reco. As long as he gets though unscathed and back to full fitness he will be doing ok.
OMG. It was MK's second game in a year after a reco. As long as he gets though unscathed and back to full fitness he will be doing ok.
He's a ruckman, they don't get a lot of possessions unless your name is Dean Cox.Nic (mr 5 disposals a game) nat over Kruse? lol
OMG. The distributer said that Kreuzer is way better than Naitanui and I stated that Naitanui played better than Kreuzer on the weekend. I didn't say that means Naitanui is better. How after Naitanui beat Kreuzer can someone say that Kreuzer is undoubtedly better? Kreuzer was best on ground or close to last week and some Carlton supporters were claiming that Kreuzer was going to destroy Naitanui on Sunday which clearly did not happen. And if you want to try and counteract what I posted you should get your facts straight, it was his third game back.OMG. It was MK's second game in a year after a reco. As long as he gets though unscathed and back to full fitness he will be doing ok.
Kreuzer was best on ground or close to last week and some Carlton supporters were claiming that Kreuzer was going to destroy Naitanui on Sunday which clearly did not happen. And if you want to try and counteract what I posted you should get your facts straight, it was his third game back.
I would take Naitanui every time, There is no shame for Kreuzer by not being as good as a Naitanui, Naitanui will just jump all over evey ruckman, and has so much strength and speed when the ball hits the deck, it is hard for ruckman to have a influence in the clearances.
Naitanui is just going to be freakish. 1 of a kind.
anybody seen the movie, White man can't jump?
Somebody upset that Naitanui destroyed Kreuzer the other dayAnd this is the same mentality of your recruiting department, ie. not understanding footy or being able to recruit the best talent. With such gems as Winderlich, Dempsey, Hocking, Myers, Dyson, Stanton, etc. you really have been recruiting well!!!!
If you can't see that Kreuzer is a "special" and "total" footballer way over and above Natanui then ?????????????????
As of right now it's Kruz by the lengh, aren't even comparable IMO, Nic Nat has potential but at this stage that's all he has, when he starts getting 20+ touches as well as hitouts and kicking goals i may reconsider, but that's still a fair way off, people forget that Kruz is only going to get better too, he could be a once in a generation player with luck.