Nathan Brown (Rich) vs Paul Chapman

[Ando_4]

At their best Brown...now Chapman.

Reasonable assessment after the past season & a half.

I like Chapman. Talented tough nut.

Browny looks set for a big season though and at his best he is better by some distance.

 

[grantyc77]

Im the same as everyone Brown WAS a freak, but Chapman is very consistent. This yr Brown looks the goods and i hope he is, he will be great for the tiges, lets face it they need all the help they can get...

 

[VINCANITY]

Fev also has 3 Wooden Spoons.

umm brown would have at least 2.

but goin back 2 the question if they were both at their best brown hands down.

 

[OneEyedHawk]

As good as Chapman is...definately Brown.

 

[jase]

browny in his prime had some magic to him.but he is a very gifted small forward who does'nt really stand out when playing in the middle, chapman is a very handy midfielder who is more than handy around goals, throw in the grunt factor & i'll take chapman any day.
seems like he lives & breathes footy too, where browny has a bit more of the "metro-man" about him.

 

[Alphanumeric]

If both are fit I would say Brown.

But going on recent form, I'd say Chapman.

 

[Dream Team 2006]

Brown is flukey. He has the skills to win a grand final, but he never will.

If you were building a team to win a premiership Chapman is a much, much, better choice.

I agree slightly. Brown has the better skills but I think Chapman is also very consistent at a good level.

Brown.. Only just.