- Joined
- Aug 15, 2009
- Posts
- 2,688
- Reaction score
- 4,407
- Location
- The Devil's personal coke roadie
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Would've preferred Lennon.
Hine, Rendell>>>>>>>>>>>me.
Lennon....
Imagine....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

System Upgrade - Search is back! - Post feedback.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Would've preferred Lennon.
Hine, Rendell>>>>>>>>>>>me.
Not sure why we picked a guy with terrible kicking efficiency.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-11-13/eight-days-to-the-draft-meet-nathan-freeman
WEAKNESSES
He can lack a tiny bit of composure sometimes with his kicking, mostly because he is running so quickly. His kicking efficiency for the Dragons was 60.2 per cent, with most of the other top midfielders a touch higher. He still is a little inconsistent, and his good games for the Dragons were often followed with quieter ones, but that gap is closing.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I know we say this all the time but....I dont really remember a hell of a lot of players with suspect disposal who have actually got much better. History suggests, it doesnt work that way. Wysiwyg by now.
Course, if we actually employed a specialist skills coach for once...
one says his kicking is poor and the other one says his a a reliable kick. we do need speed
Fastest rookie with great repeat sprint times and workmanlike disposal??The criticism was a lack kicking composure.
Since Sinclair.Half as good as Danger and ill be happy how long since we had a bloke with extreme pace?
Thought I'd move this the Freeman thread. No need to discuss him in the Scharenberg thread.He's nothing like Dangerfield, other than being fast. Dangerfield is a midfielder who can go forward and dominate, similar to Riccuito before him. Freeman has been rubbish when played forward, he is shorter and isn't anywhere near as good overhead or on a lead. He also won't have the physical impact Dangerfield has due to the smaller body, and is not as inside. He's got talent, and players can work on certain weaknesses and improve on what they look like being a few years down the road from when they were drafted. But I don't see the need when you look at the profile of the rest of our younger midfield group.
I like how these clowns keep coming out with this crap about thinking you are better than Hine or Rendell when questioning a pick. No recruiter is perfect, and while I certainly don't know more than them, I also don't have to blindly applaud every single move they make as though they are infallible.
He's also 85 kgs. That isn't a small body.Know nothing about him.
Was hoping we'd take Lennon. I'll trust Hine and Bucks.